@EdKrassen According to the US v Miller (1939) the maintenance of a "Well Regulated Militia" means that those firearms most like those used by the military are the protected arms under 2d Amendment.
@EdKrassen "In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia,
Oct 31, 2022 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
@Chris_D_Steele So, we can be confident that Putin had compromising information about BOTH of the candidates of the two major parties since you reported as much in the dossier, starting in the first memorandum.
@Chris_D_Steele "Asked about the Kremlin’s reported intelligence feed to TRUMP over recent years and rumours about a Russian dossier of ‘kornpromat’ on Hillary CLINTON (being circulated), Source B confirmed the file’s existence. S/he confided in a trusted compatriot that it had been collated by
Mar 14, 2022 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
@emeriticus Not a thing odd about semi-covert CIA connections in situations like this. Here's some more:
In their book, THE ESPIONAGE ESTABLISHMENT, David Wise and Thomas Ross discuss the findings of the Church Committee about how CIA used charitable foundations as money laundries.
@emeriticus One man running the MD Anderson Foundation of Houston, Texas as a "conduit" for CIA money was LEON JAWORSKI, the Special Counsel investigating Watergate.
Jan 7, 2022 • 25 tweets • 10 min read
@Chicago1Ray These are the procedures for the objections to Electoral Votes from a particular State(s) from Electoral Count Act:
"Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing,
@Chicago1Ray and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have
Dec 31, 2021 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
@ScottAdamsSays 1. The shot stays in the arm. In the link I will provide, listen to what Dr. Shane Crotty, Phd in immunology says about that. 2. The spike protein made by the mRNA will not get loose in the blood stream. Listen again to Dr. Crotty. 3. The spike protein made by mRNA is the...
@ScottAdamsSays ...same as the spike protein on the surface of the virus as quoted from Pfizer Web site below:
Dec 22, 2021 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
@jefoster_ The immune target being used, the spike protein, is not the spike protein of SARS-COV-2. The mRNA was synthetic, a kind of computer code directing the cell to make the synthetic spike protein. The code produced a mutated spike protein, or VARIANT. No way to tell if close...
@jefoster_ ...enough to enable the immune system to recognize the spike protein of the virus. The vaccine does not use the viral spike protein as claimed by Pfizer:
@John_for_hope@RWMaloneMD I assume that the DNA damage repair is inhibited because of viral spike protein bonding to the ACE2 receptors of a number of cells, changing the gene expression of those cells and causing downstream damage.
@John_for_hope@RWMaloneMD We were not informed by vaccine developers and pharma executives that the spike protein was dangerous prior to the vaccines being rolled out. However, we were informed of a significant mutation of the SARS-COV-2 RNA genome coded by the vaccine developers that was...
Oct 23, 2021 • 18 tweets • 15 min read
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1 They are using spike protein as the immune trigger. As I reported to TLAV @YoureAllDunces I have yet to find an early (2020-January 2021) article or video that: 1. Informs public spike protein is dangerous. 2. Documents steps taking in vaccine development to neutralize danger.
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1@YoureAllDunces In addition to no documentation of steps taken to eliminate spike protein danger, we found statements from Shane Crotty, phd. in a video that two claims of "safety features" were false. Those claims were made after the danger of spike proteins were revealed to general public...
Oct 21, 2021 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
@YoureAllDunces
Update in the ongoing investigation into disclosures to the public prior to release of vaccines.
A review of three more videos of participants in vaccine development and with credentials in microbiology, etc. reflected NO disclosures of the dangers of...
...the spike protein of the virus, and no disclosures of any safety measures to control the health threats of spike protein. The SP2 mutation of the spike protein, designed in the vaccine development labs, stabilized the spike protein in a "closed position."
Oct 19, 2021 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
@YoureAllDunces Something else has to be broached as we confront the addition of this claimed safety feature for the vaccine spike protein that is supposed to prevent binding to ACE2 receptors.
The creation of the safety feature would further change the RNA genome of the vaccine's spike protein from the genome of the virus' spike protein. I don't think this fact is remotely debatable, but desperation can result in just about anything.
I am trying to find out why the long-known data of the spike protein being the engine of COVID-19 was not disclosed prior to EUA of vaccines. This is my second attempt to address this since stories keep changing. I'm going back to original articles/videos...
...and creating a kind of index document, complete with links, identifying content that could cause people to be misinformed and lead to rabbit hole research, etc.
Sep 23, 2021 • 12 tweets • 5 min read
@LL4DJT The Spike Protein is the real problem with SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-COV-2.
studyfinds.org/covid-alters-g…@LL4DJT The vaccines cause your cells to make the Spike Protein, which is the dangerous aspect of the virus, which is just a type of CARRIER of the spike protein and basically does little to impact human health. An analogy of the relationship of the spike protein to the virus is here:
Sep 17, 2021 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
@YoureAllDunces Comparison of "Spreading Speed" between SARS-COV-1 (Original SARS 2003-2004) and SARS-COV-2:
frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
"Compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is causing an even more severe pandemic due to its spreading speed and the population affected. Deep studies comparing the different disease-causing coronaviruses will shed light on the fundamental mechanisms of coronavirus
Sep 17, 2021 • 21 tweets • 17 min read
@MichaelWeddle15@with_integrity@stranahan Why does Trump enact Neocon policies like the coup in Venezuela and putting troops in Syria in the first place? It needs to be explained why CrowdStrike told the story they told to WAPO on June 13, 2016--indirectly--that Fancy Bear did NOT steal the emails.
@MichaelWeddle15@with_integrity@stranahan That makes them look stupid when Guccifer 2.0 shows up and claims he stole the emails. When you look at Shawn Henry's declassified testimony to Congress, it APPPEARS that CrowdStrike thought Cozy Bear could have stolen the emails. CrowdStrike admitted they did not witness...
Sep 15, 2021 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
@RWMaloneMD Doctor: I have been researching the S1 protein of the original SARS virus from early 2000s to see if it performed similar actions against human health as does the SARS-COV-2 S1 protein. The SARS spike was just as dangerous as it turns out.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@1foreverseeking “No, Really, mRNA Vaccines Are Not Going To Affect Your DNA” is also a good read.
Unless the Reverse Transcriptase enzyme is secreted inside that lipid package. RT enables RNA to be transcribed into DNA rather than DNA going to RNA.
flemingmethod.com@1foreverseeking I ran the Google search question--Does the human body contain the Reverse Transcriptase enzyme? One of the answers follows:
The History of Research into Corona Virus Spike Protein
2004--2020
We've been told that the researchers who came up with the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 did not realize the spike protein was a danger to humans in its own right, separate from the virus.
In the next breath, the same researchers say that the spike protein of the SARS-COV-2 virus was not the one used for the mRNA vaccines, so, if it wasn't the same, was the spike protein used NOT dangerous since it isn't the same one as on the virus itself? The dangerous...
1 subscribed