The world should’ve listened to @WHO, you say? About which point?
No human-to-human transmission?
A thread with some more guesses, because @WHO certainly said some things, just not sure any are worth believing. google.com/amp/s/www.barr…
No human-to-human transmission?
A thread with some more guesses, because @WHO certainly said some things, just not sure any are worth believing. google.com/amp/s/www.barr…
Or maybe about you had meant China’s commitment to transparency? Is that a valuable insight from @WHO? @anticorruption seems to disagree. transparency.org/cpi2019
Or for sharing information? Something that, as @WSJ has reported, took precious days as the virus spread across the globe? wsj.com/articles/how-i…
Or for China’s “impressive” response? A suggestion thoroughly debunked by @Axios? google.com/amp/s/www.axio…
Or the idea that China has reduced the number of #coronavirus deaths? Which @axios also debunked? Is that what you mean @DrTedros?
Maybe you mean that a travel ban isn’t necessary? That advice? Given global travel has shut down, I would imagine a few people disagree with you there.
Perhaps the Chinese propaganda talking point that we shouldn’t refer to the disease based on where it’s from? Is that what you mean, @WHO?
Or maybe you just mean the Belt and Road Initiative is wonderful? I’m sure more of that would’ve helped achieve #HealthforAll
