1/ Todays #rewildingscience paper examines how climate change interacts with other disturbances to alter functioning ecosystems in the Serengeti. It shows the joined up nature of ecosystems & trophic levels & challenges conservation to think at a landscape scale. #rewilding
2/ The paper focuses on 4 principles (1) interaction of environmental change with human-modified habitat; (2) slow change in the community; (3) fast change: rapid community shifts and stable states; and (4) other disturbances that override environmental change
3/ The study used road transects between 1997 and 2011 split between savanna and agricultural habitats along with historic literature to sample bird communities and monitored tree densities alongside this to investigate the relationship between tree stem density & bird diversity
4/ Rainfall is the main environmental driver in Serengeti with temperature being of lesser importance. Biological communities respond to changes in rainfall; if conditions become drier, communities will move towards wetter regions, and if wetter then the reverse will occur.
5/ The avifauna is a good example of this, however barriers present limiting factors. If conditions become wetter, the fauna that depends on trees cannot move to drier areas because the habitat changes from savanna (with trees) to open treeless grassland – trees cannot grow
6/ Conversely if conditions become drier, the native avifauna will move towards wetter areas that now are severely modified by agriculture. Trees are largely absent, native grasses are replaced by monocultures of domestic crops and shrubs become abundant along hedgerows
7/ Results showed the number of species in savanna were higher by a factor of two than in agriculture. For African wide species, East African species and Regional endemics there were significantly more species recorded in savannah than agriculture in each range category.
8/ The number of savanna species continued to increase as sample size increased, whereas the number of agricultural species was reaching an asymptote, indicating there would be even larger differences in number of species
9/ The study also found significantly more species in savanna than in agriculture at all trophic levels. Both herbivores and insectivores lost 14–15% of species in agriculture. While for vertebrate feeder richness, 38% of species disappeared in agriculture
10/ These results suggest that major changes in habitat cause animal communities to change. With local endemics (usual most habitat specific) the most impacted, with generalist african wide species the least
11/ This result implies that if climate change causes rainfall to decrease, birds will be forced to move westwards to stay in a region with the same rainfall. The consequence would be that some species would move into agricultural areas causing the loss of fragile species
12/ The results also show a greater proportion of species and individuals at the higher trophic levels are lost in the move to agriculture compared to those at the lower herbivore levels. This change in the trophic structure could result in more marked tropic cascades.
13/ The paper emphasises the loss of key functional species would have profound impacts on the entire system. For example the loss of insectivores recorded, would result in episodic insect outbreaks.
14/ Similarly, rodent-eating raptors respond to outbreaks of rodents. After outbreak events rodents remain at low numbers for intervening years due this response. However, in agriculture effectively all these raptor species disappear causing prolonged outbreaks of these 'pests'
15/ In Serengeti there has been a more general spread of species due to climate change. These illustrate that changes in community structure as a result of ecosystem disturbances, one of which is environmental change, has led to changes in trophic dynamics
16/ Next the paper highlghts the role avifauna plays in determining plant community structure. Change in this fauna due to disturbance, results in a change in plant community state.
17/ The study found that as tree density and canopy cover declined, the number of forest bird species declined from 26 species in 1966 to 3 in 2006. This decline in species occurred primarily when gaps in the canopy allowed grasses and herbs to encroach on the forest floor
18/ The paper highlights the stable interaction of birds, fruits, germination and seedling recruitment in undisturbed forest. Birds protect seeds, through feeding, from beetle attack, indirectly improving the germination of seeds and ultimately regeneration of forest tree species
19/ The disappearance of this stability through disturbance causes the forest to unravel through a positive feedback loop. The drop in frugivorous bird feeding leads to bruchid beetle attack on seeds & a drop in germination rate & seedling recruitment to the forest tree community
20/ Once begun, the process leads to forest fragmentation and progressive unravelling in the biotic community until it disappears. The loss of a particular suite of bird species had an unexpected and catastrophic effect on the viability of the forest ecosystem as a whole.
21/ This slow change can also be influenced by other disturbance factors such as disease, which have the potential to alter both wildlife dynamics and human driven processes such as burning and hunting.
22/ The paper concludes with four lessons: (1) habitat modification through agriculture limits endemic species and top trophic levels. The loss of rare species and top trophic levels should be a big concern for conservation
23/ (2) Disease & hunting cause slow change in the species complex. This can alter community dynamics depending on which species enter or leave. (3) Habitat fragmentation or decay can cause slow change. At a threshold there may then be rapid change in the species composition
24/ Finally the paper states that accepting systems change requires a new approach to conservation. Within protected areas, new boundaries or new areas will be required. Outside them, #rewilding is required to support more biodiversity.
25/ I really liked this paper, it really emphasises the joined up nature of ecosystems and the need to avoid short-term thinking, as these profound changes are often slow. More than anything it shows that conservation thinking needs to be at a landscape level #rewildingscience
Today we're looking rewilding and animal-mediated seed dispersal in a paper that aims to identify areas and species in the Atlantic Forest to restore seed-dispersal interactions through rewilding 1/
The authors start by explaining that as animal populations and species decline, the ecological interactions involving them are lost. Trophic rewilding his to restore these interactions through reintroductions or surrogate introductions
2/
They say that certain types of animal interactions can be particularly beneficial, such as seed dispersal, which helps natural forest regeneration, creating more suitable habitat and a positive feedback loop
3/
Prehistoric or historic? What is the best baseline for #rewilding in the Neotropics? @JCSvenning and @FaurbySoren investigate the previous distribution of megafauna to inform future options of trophic rewilding in today’s #rewildingscience thread
Trophic rewilding – use of species to promote trophic cascades and self-regulating ecosystems often involves discussion around megafauna (large bodied species). Their high mobility, resitance to top-down effects, and ability to disperse nutrients makes them ecologically valuable
It is these species that have been subject to anthropogenic declines, including in the Neotropics. Historic baselines for species richness and distribution are now so intermingled with human effects that they may not represent a feasible point to base introductions on…
1/ Are you interested in how to carry out a reintroduction based #rewilding project? Then this paper (& thread) is for you. Zamboni et al introduce the reintroductions of giant anteater, collared peccaries, tapirs and more to The Iberá Rewilding Program IRP (Argentina)
2/ The Iberá rewilding project is part of the 13,000km2 Iberá Reserve; made up of public & private land. It has marshes, lagoons, small rivers, temporarily flooded grasslands, savannas, and forests. The Conservation Land Trust bought 1500km2 of private land in 1999 to restore.
Kicking off the afternoon session of the #RewildingSymposium is @JCSvenning talking about 'restoring the role of megafauna in European ecosystems'
He begins by highlighting that current megafauna is unusually poor. Last at this level >30 million years ago. Historically, super diverse megafauna was the norm.
He points out that most current species are 100,000 to >1m years old. Meaning they have a complex evolutionary background with the landscape and complex ecological characteristics
Paul Jepson of ecosulis the first speaker of the day, stating that #rewilding presents a new narrative in conservation fit for the 21st century. There are many actors shaping it, but in particlar its an opportunity for young people to shape and define their future environment
He says the science behind current laws in particular Natura2000 are based on science which is 50 years out of date. We need to redesign laws across Europe based on a new narrative and incorporating modern scientific thinking on rewilding
1/ This week we end with the future directions of conservation paper by Jozef Keulartz (2016). #rewilding has varied forms, which rather than competing, can be complementary. Read this #rewildingscience thread and join in the discussion
2/ Which historical baseline is used as a reference state is one of the central debates in #rewilding. This can depend on cultural and ecological context of where rewilding takes place….
3/ It has been argued that historic baselines are irrelevant due to current anthropogenic drivers e.g. climate change making it difficult to recreate historical ecosystems. There are two thoughts; to abandon history entirely, or to move the baseline to a more distant past