1. Is it part of a coherent policy to reduce ecological impact and improve well-being? If not, then it's not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if it closes socially vital sectors like education, gyms, cafes, places for conviviality), then it's not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if millions of people have lost their livelihoods), then it's not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if it makes rich people richer and makes inequality worse), then it's not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if there are austerity measures still in place), then it's not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if there is a lockdown that prevents people from working and playing together), then it's probably not degrowth.
If not (i.e., if the government is bailing out fossil fuel companies and airlines), then it's not degrowth.
What we need is to build a different kind of economy altogether: an economy organized around human well-being rather than around perpetual growth.