It’s now May 1, 2020, and the New York Times ran a piece by the special counsel to Pelosi’s sham impeachment hearings THAT TAKES THE FUCKING LOGAN ACT SERIOUSLY. Fuck you, you miserable, hackish lunatics. 
The Logan Act was always a joke—sounds serious, but utterly unenforceable.
Applying it to the incoming National Security Advisor, tho, is absolutely bananas.
Anyone suggesting such a thing who’s in a position to do something about it is a public menace.
Applying it to the incoming National Security Advisor, tho, is absolutely bananas.
Anyone suggesting such a thing who’s in a position to do something about it is a public menace.
It’s one thing to scribble about it on your blog or to go on CNN and hop up the crazies with a new erotic fantasy.
But if you’re in Congress or DOJ or FBI—and charging the incoming NSA with “violation of the Logan Act” is something that comes out of your mouth—you’re unfit.
But if you’re in Congress or DOJ or FBI—and charging the incoming NSA with “violation of the Logan Act” is something that comes out of your mouth—you’re unfit.
These jerkoffs are gonna look you in the eye and tell you the incoming National Security Advisor—for the first time in history!—is committing a grave crime by doing his job of talking to foreign officials about US policy? You scummy, brazen hacks.
