Why Hindus are the most hated race (aside from Hasidic Jews) or endogenous ingroup outgroup competition dynamics. One thing I've learned from English Hindutva Twitter is that is that they are under the impression that Hindus are reviled around the world and that this is due to
Hindu weakness. This is half correct, Hindus are despised, but this isn't because the Hindus are weak, to the contrary it is because of Hindu strength. The strength isn't due to the wealth and power of their urheimat or individual capability but rather community cohesion.
Human societies have different family arrangements because of different geographic and cultural circumstances, these family arrangements lead to different types of communities. Clan and family lineages will always be in competition for to monopolize a greater share of available
resources, in some communities the clan is exogenous enough to absorb outsiders, in others the preferred strategem is endogeny to make the family patronage networks even tighter. Across most of Eurasia the former arrangements are predominant more or less however across South Asia
and the middle east the latter is the default. This divergence leads to the domination of tribal and caste communitarian politics where the competition for resources has more clear cut battle lines reinforced by the pull of blood. Each Hindu caste is essentially a micro race in
in competition against other castes. The problems arise when the two separate social systems mix, when exogenous societies interact with endogenous ones. The former usually do not come out ahead while under assault unless the state intervenes on their behalf. This is because
endogenous communitarian societies achieve stability by assigning roles for all separate groups so no one is constantly infringing on another community territory. It is the essence of the caste system as well as how the Ottomans were able to maintain internal peace for centuries
Where the state functions more as a neutral contract enforcer rather than dispenser of entitlements, you will have the endogenous communities running wild grabbing as much as they can inevitably triggering a violent social reaction. The gate of the Rubashkin meat packers in the
American Midwest is a testament to this sort of situation. Scandinavian descendant Americans are the ultimate example of the exogenous community with Hasidic Jews the opposite, the fact of these two communities colliding and turning the Midwesterner into straight up neo Nazis was
predictable. Back to the Hindus, the greater migration of Hindus to exogenous societies will trigger the same reaction, particularly as numbers grow and the migration stream moves more down market. Endogenous communitarian groups can survive and thrive in wider exogenous society
without pushback as long as a few conditions are met. Either the numbers are exceedingly small, the socio-economic niche smaller and uncontested, or ingroup competence at least a standard deviation higher than the outgroup. The problem Hindus face is that the number of patrician
Brahmins in the vein of Nehru is extremely limited while the supply of Banias and other pushy middling castes who rely on self dealing within their communities to enrich themselves at outgroup expense is quite unlimited. The West had mostly known the former while Asia is more
familiar with the latter due to geographic proximity. The more exogenous societies are forced to compete with endogenous groups, the greater the hate will grow, this is inevitable.
