The GOP believes it is

🔹tyranny when a government takes steps to save lives, and
🔹good government when the wealthy get tax breaks.

That's because the GOP is the party of hierarchy.

They don't believe fairness and equality are possible.

1/ Image
Hierarchy people think there's a natural order. Some people belong on top. Others belong at the bottom.

For them, the purpose of government is to allocate power. When they are in power, they try to grab more. They cynically assume everyone sees government this way.

2/
Fairness folks believe equality is possible, so for them, the purpose of government is to create fairness, to give everyone equal opportunity, and to prevent cheating.

Hierarchy people don’t like “rules” or regulations.

Fairness people understand that rules create fairness.

3/
Yup, for decades, the GOP has done a good job masking its ideology.

They cloaked it in pretty word and dressed it in lies.

They knew without the lies, they'd never cobble together a majority.


4/
That's why they've spent decades building a propaganda network.

Without the propaganda (if history and political psychology is our guide) they'd have about 33% of the population.

That's the number that seem to naturally gravitate toward right wing nationalist parties.

5/
Hierarchical people see democratic government as giving handouts to those who don’t deserve it and hampering people who can get things done.

When hierarchical presidents go to work, they think about how to maintain the hierarchy—with them at the top.

6/
When democratic presidents go to work, they try to figure out how to make life better for people (like setting up panels to deal with pandemics)

This person quibbled with my use of the word “hierarchy”

You can see my response.

7/ Image
I tried to explain that not government is not just about allocating power.

It's about creating fairness.

He responded with a comment so cynical that it made me shudder 👇

He doesn't believe there are any historical examples of "fairness" governments.

8/ Image
Hierarchy people know that any political actions they take have one goal: To increase their own power and beat back anyone trying to encroach their power.

Because they don't believe in fairness or equality, they think all people see government as a way to power.

9/
That's why they always think they are victims. They believe everyone else is trying to displace them in the hierarchy.

They feel victimized by people demanding equality, because they don't believe in equality so they think people want to displace them.

10/
Sorry about this brief interlude.

I have to pause because I've been called away from Twitter for about another hour.

I'll try to read through the comments before resuming.

Meanwhile, some humor 👇
I'm back...

I've also talked about the differences as authoritarian v. non authoritarian.

Now I find that the hierarchy v. democracy-equality paradigm explains more and better fits the facts.

(is "paradigm" the right word?)

11/
For example, seeing the distinction as hierarchy v. equality explains the GOP obsession with abortion, which comes down to a woman's "place" in nature.


The hierarchy-power v. equality-fairness distinction comes from the study of fascism.

12/
According to experts in fascism ⤵️ fascism isn't an ideology, it's a set of tactics for maintaining power.

Fascism assumes a hierarchy. 21st century fascism (oligarchy) is all about hierarchy.

I'm trying to get to something else: The ideology behind the grab for power.

13/ Image
And then someone will come along and prove my point about cynicism and hierarchy👇

If I say, "FDR was a fairness president," a hierarchical person will say, "Whatabout the Japanese internment camps?"

Whataboutism is used by hierarchy people to prove fairness doesn't exist.

14/ Image
Mussolini said, "Democracy is beautiful in theory. In practice it’s a fallacy."

When you don't believe democracy is possible, it's all about power and who can grab it. What results is a hierarchy.

Fascism is about power and hierarchy.

15/
Thanks, Dave 👇

Fairness is an ideal that we work toward. There's never been complete fairness partly because there are always such strong forces working against fairness.

There are some comments about empathy . . .

16/
Fairness people are stunned that anyone would compare a government order in a pandemic to close businesses to a Nazi death camp.

The GOP offers a false dilemma: Either we all go back to work or the economy collapses and people starve.

There's a third option of course.

17/ Image
The third option is that the government reallocates resources and uses the vast resources of the US to make sure nobody is hungry and everyone can get through this pandemic.

But the Trump-GOP won't do this.
They won't even take steps to get testing.


18/
Part of the reason is because government action to help people goes against their ideology.

The best historical comparison that I can think of is President Hoover, who, during the Great Depression, thought the government should do nothing.

So he did nothing.

19/
A lot of people died.

Hoover lost the next election in a landslide and we got FDR, a fairness president👇(who I know a little bit about).

He gave us social security, minimum wage, a 40 hour work week, protection for workers, and the GI bill.

20/ Image
Yes, it's frustrating to be living through a pandemic with a president who is 10 times worse than Hoover.

One thing we learn from FDR is that winning elections by large margins allows us to make rapid changes.

That's why we all have to focus on November.

21/ Image
22/ Yes, exactly👇

Fairness people—watching the GOP try to reopen before providing protection—are tearing their hair anger and with frustration: How can they be so cruel? Can't they see the vulnerable will suffer?

Hierarchy people, on the other hand. . .
23/. . .think nature will take its course, or it will be "God's will," or "of course people with more resources can make it through this more easily." Or "Pence doesn't have to worry. Meat packers do. That's life."

Good question 👇
Answer: Both . . .
24/ All through US history, fairness people opposed the hierarchy people.

If we'd had all fairness people writing the Constitution, there would have been no slavery.

Hamilton said without that compromise, there would have been no union.

Jim Crow was hierarchical.
Here is this thread as a blog post: terikanefield-blog.com/tyranny-v-good…
Yes, definitely.

I think for some, it's brainwashing. For others it's fear. For some it's probably hardwired, but I tend to think anyone can be reached.

Not before November, though. Don't wear yourselves out! The election will be won with voter turnout.
Are you asking why I say "GOP" instead of "Republican Party" ?

Twitter's character limits.

Republican Party: 16 characters
GOP: 3

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(