Story time: I was once an intern reporter for the Times of India in Delhi, and went to a Korea-India FDI conference (because ofc what else do you do with the Korean American intern). There I met a POSCO rep who had struggled to get land for a steel plant for nearly a decade...
...An Indian state signed an MOU with POSCO in 2005 for a plant but didn’t have any land. POSCO spent the next decade in legal, media battles over land with villagers, politicians, bentel nut farmers, scheduled castes, the local Communist Party:
scroll.in/article/832463…
...also that year, I knew some who worked for the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor. The DMIC, as they call it, envisioned a high speed rail link between Delhi and Mumbai slicing through 24 special industrial zones. Make in India! High tech! Smart cities! Sounds great right?
...well, I visited the office one day. As I recall, maybe a few dozen people in cubicles around a conference table, in a wing of a tony Delhi hotel.
“So, where’s everyone else?” I asked.
“This is it!” I was told.
A few dozen. For the most ambitious industrial project in India.
...these brave, few souls were grappling with massive land acquisition issues from Maharashtra to Haryana. Legal battles. Reticitant villagers. Courthouses with decades-old cases, rotting and gathering dust. For a tiny taste, check this piece out: business-standard.com/article/econom…
...The DMIC launched in 2006. Now, nearly 15 years later, it has little to show for it. There are no smart cities. There aren’t many investors. The backbone of the project, the railway, started construction years behind of schedule and still won’t be done for years to come...
...now Modi officials seem to be losing interest, a decade after hyping this as “the world’s largest infrastructure project”.

That, friends, is why I am skeptical of Delhi’s efforts to claim China’s crown as king of manufacturing. Before, during, or after this COVID-19 pandemic.
...don’t buy too much into decoupling hype. Yes some see this pandemic as a chance to decouple from China. But it’s one thing for politicians to say this - another for businesses to leave. China offers world-class infrastructure at a price that can’t be beat. That hasn’t changed
Read this sharp-eyed analyst’s take on why you should be skeptical of this Indian land bank’s ability to pose any kind of meaningful competition to China:
freepressjournal.in/business/inves…
lest anyone think I’m being dour on India here, let me state for the record that anyone who knows me knows that I love India. It’s one of the liveliest, most exciting, vibrant and just plain beautiful places in the world. Not everything can be measured in trade figures and GDP!
*betel nut

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dake Kang

Dake Kang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dakekang

23 Feb
1/ It's official. The Associated Press is now using the spelling "Uyghur", not "Uighur".

This is because "Uyghur" is closer to the native pronunciation of the word: OOEE’-ger. The pronunciation WEE’-ger, common in Anglophone media, is slightly off.

A bit of history...
2/ In the 1960s, during the Cultural Revolution, the Chinese government banned use of the Uyghur script, based on Arabic letters, and instead forced Uyghurs to use a Romanized form based on the Pinyin system.
3/ Restrictions on use of the Uyghur script were lifted with liberal reforms in 1979, but use of the old Pinyin-based romanization system persisted in English-language Chinese media and government communications.
Read 7 tweets
30 Dec 20
NEW: After Beijing announced the virus was spreading in Jan, Chinese scientists rushed to publish papers. Then, the tide slowed to a trickle.

Now, documents obtained by @AP show this happened b/c President Xi ordered new restrictions on COVID-19 research.
apnews.com/article/united…
2/The docs, retyped here without identifying marks, show authorities tightened research controls in Feb. and March - soon after a paper by Chinese scientists suggested the virus could have escaped from a Wuhan lab, kicking off an international blame game
web.archive.org/web/2020021414… ImageImage
3/Word of some restrictions trickled out on university websites earlier this year, where they were noticed, reported by @guardian @CNN, and promptly deleted. They showed professors needed approval to do research on the origins of the virus from authorities
nature.com/articles/d4158…
Read 20 tweets
3 Dec 20
1/ NEW: During 12 fateful days in January, Chinese authorities failed to report any new coronavirus cases, lulling Wuhan residents into complacency.

Why? In part, because of cronyism and secret deals between the China CDC and three Shanghai companies
apnews.com/article/intern…\
2/At first the China CDC moved swiftly, sequencing the virus in 24 hours and writing test protocols in 48. The natural next step, experts and CDC staff say, would have been to publish the sequences, distribute protocols and let scientists to test for the virus.

It was not to be. Image
3/Instead, the China CDC instituted a top-down, rigid disease detection system. They took charge and shoved competing agencies out of the way, demanding all patient samples be routed through Beijing.

One CDC technician told me they made confirming cases “mission impossible”.
Read 29 tweets
5 Mar 20
1/ For over a year, @yananw & I chased this story about China's labor transfer program, under which hundreds of Uighurs working at a tech plant are barred from leaving their compound without minders. Their company supplies Apple, Lenovo, other tech giants:
apnews.com/3f9a92b8dfd3ca…
2/ It was one of the hardest stories I've ever done because of its nuances and complexities, as well as increasingly-routine police harassment. We couldn't speak directly to the Uighur workers, because they weren't allowed out. Nonetheless, we made some interesting discoveries:
3/ The factory employs many Hui, another largely Muslim minority. They told us that the Uighurs are treated differently. They're not allowed out, they can't worship or wear headscarves, and they have to take politics classes in the evening. (They are, however, paid equal wages)
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!