.@NAACP_LDF Deputy Director of Litigation Leah Aden will kick off closing arguments for the plaintiff side addressing the intentional racial discrimination claim under the 14th & 15th Amendments of the Constitution.
The FL legislature did not simply target with a disparate impact on Black voters, it was motivating with a specific intent to limit Black voters access to the franchise.
The FL legislature did not just target returning citizens generally...who are majority Black...it was more precise even… it knew it would disproportionately hurt Black voters.
Targeting voters based on race, even as the proxy of partisanship, is an inadmissible motive...here it is intended to limit the political participation of Black voters.
The court has repeatedly looked at what constitutes as excessive...The state is trying to use that strong arm of the state to penalize people who are trying to exercise their right to vote.
-Nancy Abudu of @splcenter
"We are not expecting the court to solve all of the social ills that exist in this society, but we are asking the court to exercise its authority to block #SB7066 so that it doesn't make those social ills even worse."
"All of these LFOs are going to fund the government...
The #1 priority for partial payment is that it goes to the government..and that is quintessentially a tax."
"The department will not credit voters for payments to the victims...it incentivizes people to move away from paying restitution to victims and instead pay the state taxes."
"These issues that the supervisor of elections, voters and voter registration organizations are asked to traverse are extraordinarily complicated...It is complicated and not going to get better."
Finally, finishing out the plaintiff closing argument is @JulesTwitted of @ACLU, addressing the wealth discrimination claim, uniformity claim, 1st Amendment claim, and other issues.
"Supervisors of elections have [said] they don’t know what documents to look at to make these determinations...Now there's the added difficulty of determining the amount paid."
"Individual citizens will face significant burdens if they have to go back and figure what they have paid in each sentence…to the extent this is a real policy...it makes it impossible for individuals to figure out how much they owe."
"As far as the voters who a genuinely unable to pay...there has been no guidance by the Secretary of State...people are afraid to register, they are afraid to be prosecuted and I don’t blame them."
"The system is also not uniform [among counties]… we heard that clerks offices do not track the amount...there are different payment rules...there are different removal procedures."
"For these reasons, we ask the court to find that Florida's system of asking returning citizens to pay for their right to vote violates the US Constitution."
Judge Hinkle: [The plaintiffs] challenge application of #Amendment4 to the extent it requires payment that, under the US Constitution, cannot be imposed as a condition of voting. I understand [Florida's] effort to read their claim more narrowly, but that’s just not their claim.
Rebuttal of the state's closing argument is now underway.
“The only thing the first dollar theory does is fill the coffers of the state and enrich debt collectors.”
If the basis for passing this law was to have made things easy to administer, we submit that they could not have filed a law that made it more difficult to determine fees and eligibility to vote.
"Some of our clients have waited their entire lives to vote. Their constitutional rights cannot be sacrificed at the altar of feasibility and bureaucracy of the state."
May 17, 1954, the day the decision in Brown vs. Board of Education was issued, marks a defining moment in the history of the United States. The Supreme Court declared the doctrine of “separate but equal” unconstitutional.
To litigate Brown vs. Board of Education, Thurgood Marshall recruited the nation’s best attorneys. LDF lawyers were assisted by a brain trust of legal scholars, historians, and social science researchers. More about the legal minds behind the case: naacpldf.org/brown-vs-board…
The legal victory in Brown v. Board of Education did not transform the country overnight, and much work remains. However, striking down segregation in U.S. public schools provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement. Its impact has been felt by every American.
In 1961, John Lewis joined the Freedom Riders, a group traveling by bus to ensure that the Supreme Court decision banning discrimination in transportation services was upheld. They were repeatedly physically attacked and imprisoned, but they remained steadfast in their objective.
LDF directly represented Mr. Lewis and other activists in numerous civil rights matters. LDF founder Thurgood Marshall was on the Lewis v. Greyhound legal team, which involved a violent attack on the Freedom Riders at the Montgomery, AL, bus terminal. naacpldf.org/naacp-publicat…
In 1963, Mr. Lewis became the national chair of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He was one of the organizers of the 1963 March on Washington and, at the age of 23, was the youngest individual to make remarks at the event.
In 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. led the March on Washington to call for an end to segregation, economic justice, and access to the ballot. Today, the fight for voting rights is just as urgent. naacpldf.org/march-on-washi…
As buses pulled into D.C. and hundreds arrived via trains onto the National Mall for the March on Washington, the gravity of the moment was clear. 250,000 people marched — the unprecedented turnout was a testament to the power of grassroots organizing. naacpldf.org/march-on-washi…
When MLK gave his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech, the passage of the Voting Rights Act was still two years away. Echoing his earlier calls to give us the ballot, he said “We cannot be satisfied” until we have the right to vote and a voice in our democracy.
TONIGHT at 9:00PM EST: @Sifill_LDF joins @Maddow live to discuss her decision to step down as LDF President and Director-Counsel.
"I’ve worked very hard to make LDF strong and to help Americans see that civil rights institutions and civil rights work is critical—not just for the citizenship and dignity of Black people, but for the health of American democracy." @Sifill_LDF
“2024 is coming very quickly and I want to make sure the next leader [of LDF] is fully in place and prepared for that. The next chapter for me…will always involve this work that I have committed my life to.” -@Sifill_LDF
Starting now! @Sifill_LDF joins @allinwithchris on @MSNBC to discuss the Freedom to Vote Act. The bill aimed at strengthening voting rights and overhauling the nation's election systems failed to advance in the Senate today.
"The reality of what we are dealing with is no different than the reality of what Black voters were dealing with in 1964. Voter suppression was being perpetuated and advanced to keep fellow citizens from being able to vote...and that is what is happening today." -@Sifill_LDF
"When we see a vote like this today—not a vote against a bill, but a vote against talking about a bill—in what is supposed to be the greatest deliberative body in the world, the United States Senate, then we know our democracy has lost its way." -@Sifill_LDF
.@SIfill_LDF joins @maddow to discuss the anniversary of #GeorgeFloyd's death and today's confirmation of Kristen Clarke. Tune in tonight at 9:35 ET on @MSNBC
We are not out of the woods yet, but there have been important shifts that have happened.
“One of the most important is in the narrative of the nature of policing. We are now not just talking about individuals, we are talking about reimagining public safety.” —@Sifill_LDF
There has been a policy shift. There are multiple states that have passed laws requiring more transparency and police accountability.
“We don’t want to forget these changes are happening—because we saw the largest mass protest ever in the United States last summer.”@Sifill_LDF