@TwitterSupport Just to clarify, "wishing or hoping" in words that someone experiences physical harm is wrong.
But we CAN create look-alike effigy's of people, make a video of that effigy being violently attacked and it's a-ok?
But we CAN create look-alike effigy's of people, make a video of that effigy being violently attacked and it's a-ok?
2) According to Twitter's own words in this violation notification "wishing or hoping that someone experiences physical harm" is a violation of their terms of service. Yet they have hosted a video of a look-alike effigy of the President being violently attacked since April 18th. 
3) This video absolutely incites violence and hatred against a sitting U.S. President and a "person" in violation of Twitter's terms of service, yet it continues to be hosted in the public domain by both Twitter and Youtube despite multiple complaints which have gone unanswered.
4) @FCC @BrendanCarrFCC @SenTedCruz
Exactly when do social media giants and the big tech industry cross that fine line from being both publishers and platforms and become well oiled Political Action Groups? I hate to say it, but it's past time for gov't regulation.
Exactly when do social media giants and the big tech industry cross that fine line from being both publishers and platforms and become well oiled Political Action Groups? I hate to say it, but it's past time for gov't regulation.
