This article is quite extraordinary. It's like trapped in amber from 15 years ago. wsj.com/articles/dont-…@elyratner A couple of point/counterpoints: 1/
"We'd be wiser to adhere to Physician heal thyself than to scapegoat China." Who's scapegoating China? The oped itself says: "China certainly bears enormous responsibility forpandemic". If that's true -as it is- aren't @SecPompeo@HawleyMO et al right to hold PRC accountable? 2/
#NSS & #NDS "overstate China’s ambitions and capabilities alike. China’s strategic preoccupation, as its 2019 defense white paper makes clear, is maintaining its territorial integrity & internal stability." Is this really using PRC white paper as authoritative source on goals? 3/
"China can best be understood as a regional power that seeks to reduce U.S. influence in its backyard and to increase its influence with its neighbors." Wait. Isn't China now largest economy in world in PPP? Why is its power so limited? 4/
Such a strong state seeking to increase power by necessity is like Jupiter in the Solar System. @haass compares to Mercury or some minor planet. 5/
"And when China does reach farther afield, its instruments tend to be primarily economic." Sure. But what about the global PLA that is emerging? media.defense.gov/2019/May/02/20… And what about China's global political coercion? voanews.com/covid-19-pande… 6/
This seems like a low bar that's a caricature of the USSR! "Unlike the Soviet Union, China isn’t looking to impose its model on others around the globe or to control international politics in every corner of the world." 7/
"China faces serious limitations in trying to extend its reach and influence. The era of double-digit Chinese economic growth is over." Sure - but what is growth rate of the advanced economies? It's comparative. 9/
"Of course, China poses both an actual and a potential threat—but it’s one that can be addressed without making China the focal point of American foreign policy." Why, given that China is 1st time US is not largest economy in global system since 19th century? 10/
This is the siren song toward failure right here: "the U.S. should push back against China where necessary to defend US interests. As much as possible, however, this competition should be bounded so that it doesn’t preclude cooperation with China in areas of mutual interest." 11/
No hard choices! Cake and eat it too!
America should stick with #NDS#NSS direction in which we're now moving.
.@realDonaldTrump common sense policy is getting results:
"European Nato members are holding talks about increasing the alliance’s target for defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP at its annual summit next June partly in anticipation of Donald Trump’s return as president." 1/
Here's this *insane* idea: Europe should spend at least as much to defend itself as Americans do! Crazy, right? No: Common sense!
Europeans know they need to do this. They just need to be pressed, as @realDonaldTrump has done, not let off the hook, as @POTUS has. 2/
@realDonaldTrump @POTUS "Trump’s demand that Europe should pay more for its own defence, and a realisation that current spending levels are not enough to support Ukraine and to deter Russia, has forced capitals to take on board the scale of the under-investment." 3/
Now that voters have clearly discredited Liz Cheney and the associated brand of extreme hawkishness, Democrats might consider working with the new Republican Party that is *actually much more moderate and sensible* on foreign and security issues.
Observe: 1/
The new GOP led by @realDonaldTrump is focused on:
- Ending wars and avoiding new ones.
- Reducing the threat of nuclear war.
- Ensuring the military spends its money wisely and efficiently.
- Ensuring accountability in the intelligence community and the security services. 2/
@realDonaldTrump Ask a random Democrat from 1965, 1975, or 1985 if these were Democrats issues and you can be absolutely sure they’d claim they were.
What does this mean?
Latent beneath the superficial disagreements, there’s huge potential for bipartisan action on *common sense* policies. 3/
This is the shockingly bad military situation @POTUS is leaving @realDonaldTrump. Profoundly irresponsible and dangerous.
America's defenses are deep in a hole and it won't be easy to get out of it. @realDonaldTrump has laid out the way.
"“God forbid we end up in a full-scale war with the PRC,” Jake Sullivan said. “But any war with a country like the PRC, a military like the PRC, is going to involve the exhaustion of munition stockpiles very rapidly.” 2/
Why didn't they do this instead of blowing through our stockpiles and barely touching our defense industrial base, instead focusing on green initiatives?
Sullivan warned that the U.S. needs to be “stockpiling both the vital munitions we know we’ll need..." 3/
"Europe, however, squandered the time it should have spent investing more heavily into the relationship—including by building up its own defenses...European leaders cannot simply shift the blame for their predicament to Washington." 1/
"Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 should have been the final wake-up call, creating real momentum behind Europe’s effort to become a credible security actor in its own right. Instead, once again, it relied on the United States to take the lead in a European war." 2/
"European leaders must act decisively to...demonstrate to the US that Europe is prepared to hold up its side of a mutually beneficial partnership. Europe’s security will have to be European—or it won’t exist at all." 3/
I wasn't referring so much to your influence on the @POTUS administration as to your track record in assessing the war. I happily invite comparisons to my own.
It's essential to understand that @POTUS @VP administration is leaving a *terrible situation* for @realDonaldTrump @JDVance.
Senior NSC official: "They’re in a very difficult, extremely difficult situation with Russia, in egregious ways, continuing to escalate this conflict." 1/
"Unfortunately, that is part and parcel of what we have seen throughout this time, which is Russia’s willingness to continue to up the ante."
So the battlefield situation is "extremely difficult" and Russia is willing to escalate. Terrible. 2/
The U.S. intelligence assessment according to @nytimes:
U.S. "officials have concluded that the war in Ukraine is no longer a stalemate as Russia makes steady gains, and the sense of pessimism in Kyiv and Washington is deepening." 3/