Michael Otsuka Profile picture
May 11, 2020 29 tweets 9 min read Read on X
The high number of deaths of London bus drivers is of a piece with other evidence that prolonged exposure in enclosed spaces to someone infected w/ coronavirus is unsafe. 2 metre social distancing won't make buses, the tube, classrooms, or shared offices safe. 1/10
First, here's the other evidence, from US CDC papers about a restaurant & a call centre & further studies involving a church, indoor sporting event, etc. 2/10
erinbromage.com/post/the-risks…
It's alarming that the rate of coronavirus death among London bus drivers is 16 times the death rate of NHS workers. 3/10
ft.com/content/bae971… Image
Bus drivers also account for the vast majority of coronavirus deaths among all London transport workers: 28 of 37. 4/10
nytimes.com/2020/05/02/wor… Image
This high death rate suggests that airborne coronavirus infection will be hard to avoid in journeys on public transport, or in other enclosed spaces where people remain for more than a brief period of time. 5/10
London bus drivers sit in enclosed cab, behind a plastic screen with holes👇. They can also ventilate their cab by opening their window. Passengers don't generally sit or stand close to them for a prolonged period of time. 6/10 Image
So their <2 metre exposure to an infected passenger will typically have been for a very brief period, when the passenger boards, taps the yellow circle & proceeds to a seat more than 2 metres away. 7/10
Brief exposures of <2 metres, plus prolonged exposure to the same air that passengers breath, were sufficient to give rise to a high rate of infection. This casts doubt on the efficacy of a policy of 2 metre social distancing on public transport. 8/10
And we already have other evidence (see 2/) that, if you're in the same (or connected via air conditioning) enclosed space as someone who is infected for an extended period of time, your risk of infection is high even if you're much more than 2 metres away. 9/10
So we'll need much more than 2 metre social distancing to make indoor spaces where we spend prolonged periods of time safe. This applies to public transport, workplaces, classrooms, restaurants, bars, cinemas & places of worship. 10/10
This tweet suggests that good PPE accounts for the much lower (see 3/10) death rate among NHS workers.
ONS data released today on rates of death from covid-19 by occupation: doctors, nurses & other healthcare workers = "10.2 deaths per 100,000 males (43 deaths) and 4.8 deaths per 100,000 females (63 deaths)", which is not statistically different from general population. 1/
"Men and women working in social care, a group including care workers and home carers, both had significantly raised rates of death involving COVID-19, with rates of 23.4 deaths per 100,000 males (45 deaths) and 9.6 deaths per 100,000 females (86 deaths)." 2/
"Other occupations with significantly higher rates include bus and coach drivers, with 26.4 deaths per 100,000 males (29 deaths)." (No rate reported for bus & coach drivers who are women.) 3/
👇. 4/4 Source: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati… Image
.@RKWinvisibleman above ONS figures indicate that death rate among male bus drivers is about 2.5 times the death rate among health care workers. That's hard to reconcile with your 16 times figure👇re NHS workers.
Seoul opens windows on air conditioned buses to reduce risk of coronavirus transmission. (Also requires fask masks on subways.) Image
The 'Routemaster' London buses that Boris Johnson reintroduced when mayor are notorious for their lack of ventilation, even after they were retrofitted with windows that can open (which allow for far less intake of air from the outside than the windows on the older buses). Image
Govt's Covid-19 guidance for workplace offices👇stresses significance of "2m social distancing wherever possible". 1/
gov.uk/guidance/worki…
But, as @ErinBromage notes in post to which I link in 2/10 above, such advice is inappropriate for such settings. Key passage👇. 2/2 Image
Long, well-researched piece on risks of virus transmission on airplanes:
washingtonpost.com/local/traffica…
.@ucu members check your inbox for UCU Covid-19 survey. 1/
Here's my response to a key question👇. 2/2 Image
.@BBCr4today piece on plans by gyms to re-open w/ 2 metre social distancing. In addition to problems identified above w enclosed spaces, gyms provide a further problem of transmission via heavy breathing. See this👇from @ErinBromage's blog post in 2/10 above. Image
UK govt's one-size-fits-all application of 2 metre social distancing to parks, garden centres, open plan offices, classroom, the tube & gyms undermines their credibility. 2 metres is not some universal magic barrier. Doesn't work like this👇.
See ONS graph of "exposure to generic disease & physical proximity to others" of bus drivers, relative to nurses & care workers. 1/
ons.gov.uk/employmentandl… Image
Note that the level of exposure of primary & nursery school teachers is rates as slightly higher than that of bus drivers. 2/ Image
This is of relevance to the current debate over whether it's safe to re-open schools in June. See also this thread👇on the safety of classroom teachers & students from Covid-19 infection. 3/3

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Otsuka

Michael Otsuka Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MikeOtsuka

Jul 4, 2023
.@ucu says👇they've "received a letter from UCEA confirming their willingness to enter urgent negotiations..." However, the letter from @ucea1 says "the purpose of such a meeting is to explore ... whether a basis can be identified for the resumption of negotiations..." 1/
@ucu @UCEA1 That appears to fall short of the expression of a willingness to enter into urgent negotiations. The linked👇@ucea1 letter also says "As we have consistently stated, our mandate from the sector does not permit us to improve upon the 2023-24 pay uplift." 2/
ucea.ac.uk/our-work/colle…
@ucu @UCEA1 It continues: "In addition, our ability to continue negotiations on the pay-related issues from phase two of the negotiating round was contingent upon there being an acceptance of the Acas terms of reference and there being no further industrial action." 3/
Read 5 tweets
May 30, 2023
Now that @ucu's Congress is back in person (it went online during Covid), union policy is set by about 300 of its 120,000 members who are prepared to spend all 3 days of the spring bank holiday weekend in a conference center somewhere in the UK.... 1/
...listening to speeches on dozens of motions on a range of topics which needn't have any apparent relevance to the work of a UK University and College Union. The drafters of the notorious Ukraine motion didn't even bother to draw some tenuous connection to higher education. 2/
These 300 conference delegates who set union policy are largely unelected, since the number who put themselves forward in branch meetings typically doesn't exceed the number of delegates alloted to the branch. 3/
Read 12 tweets
May 27, 2023
🧵on the @ucu candidates for USS negotiator whom Congress delegates will elect. Here's the list of candidates👇. The three who are elected negotiators become UCU-appointed members of USS's JNC & the 2 reserves = alternates. 1/
ucu.org.uk/media/13818/El… Image
Mark Taylor-Batty (@cupofassam) & Jackie Grant are currently elected negotiators & JNC members. They have been instrumental in putting things on track for a full restoration of benefits👇. They clearly merit reappointment. 2/
ucu.org.uk/article/12962/…
Renee Prendergast is currently an elected alternate on JNC. As a past chair of UCU negotiators, she has a lot of negotiating experience & a realistic & well-informed approach. It would be ideal if Renee is elected alongside Jackie & Mark to serve on JNC in 2023-24. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Dec 1, 2021
🧵explaining what's so wrong with @USSEmployers VC Alistair Fitt's claim on @BBCr4today that "Modelling published by the @USSpensions trustee themselves shows that impact [of UUK's proposed pension cuts] is likely to be between 10% & 18% for the vast majority of members." 1/
As I've drawn to @USSEmployers's attention on more than one occasion👇, the 10-18% range is based on an outdated & otherwise indefensible assumption which understates the detrimental effect of the 2.5% cap on CPI revaluation. Please read🧵👇. 2/
.@ucu noted that this assumption was so indefensible that persisting with it would expose the consultation to legal challenge. We maintained that our actuary @FirstActuarial's modelling of the inflation cap was far more accurate. 3/
Read 28 tweets
Oct 21, 2021
In his 18 Oct letter to @ucu GS @DrJoGrady, @AlistairJarvis repeats this false £860 claim.👇 He writes: "a university staff member earning £40,000 per annum would be paying an additional £860 in pension contributions next year for the same benefits". 1/
The actual annual increase is +£550, not +£860. When we break this down by month, paying an extra £40 per month from April to Oct 2022 would make it possible for this member to retain current pension benefits rather than take the hit of the UUK cuts.👇2/
The extra £40 per month = a rise from £327 to £367 paid each month. That's a 12% increase to avoid UUK's reduction in their future accrual from 1/75 to 1/85 during that period, PLUS UUK's reduction in the upper limit of inflation protection from 10% to 2.5%. 3/
Read 28 tweets
Jun 5, 2021
🚨🚨🚨The SAUL pension scheme announces that it is in SURPLUS -- 109% funded -- as at 31 April 2021. It was, however, in deficit -- 94% funded -- as at 31 March 2020 triennial valuation date. (@JosephineCumbo) 1/
saul.org.uk/#/page/sauls-h… Image
It appears that SAUL's actuary has certified the Schedule of Contributions at 30 April 2021 date of signing rather than 31 March 2020 valuation date. Hence the schedule assumes a surplus & therefore no deficit recovery contributions. 2/
While past pensions promises are more than fully funded, the cost of making pension promises in future years is now estimated to cost 35% if benefits and investment strategy remains the same. This is 13% above the current 22% contribution rate (6% member, 16% employer). 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(