I've spent a month+ thinking on energy in an age of abundance, pandemic-induced or not. Today's math is different from the old math, be it in expected sector return on capital to structural readiness for negative prices. Hint: one sector comes out looking better-prepared.
1/ Oil majors tightening their belt - inevitable, given current market; not great for any energy source, given that the majors are considerable asset and corporate investors in clean energy bloomberg.com/news/articles/… 
2/ Integrated oil company returns on equity: Far from the heady days of the early 2000s, and trending back down again bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3/ Contrast: renewable levelized cost of electricity at 8-11% return on equity. Onshore wind and solar PV are now the lowest-cost new sources of power generation for at least 2/3 global population, 71% of global GDP, and 85% of global power generation. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
4/ Contrast: Oil at -$37/barrel is a sign of profound dislocation - and even then, negative oil isn't free, can't really induce demand, cannot shape consumer behavior, as @liamdenning and I wrote here bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
5/ Contrast: Electricity prices go negative too - but that's not as big a deal. A power plant can reduce or shut off capacity, or isolate or give away its output*, but no one says "you're offline and never coming back" the way a well can be shut in. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
6/ Difference: A barrel of oil isn’t a product in its own right; it’s an input to other processes. Even free oil isn’t free, since it needs physical transformation to be useful. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
7/ Difference: Electrons arrive at an end user ready to go — a finished input into lighting, refrigeration, data processing, arc welding, whatever, and at any scale. It’s as useful to an aluminum smelter as to a Tesla as to an electric toothbrush. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
8/ That makes electricity easier to give away, and demand for it to shift temporally and spatially. Google knows this. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
9/ Which is why Google has inverted the paradigm of demand response, to now turn on energy-intensive loads to capture low (and surely at some times, negative) power prices, with zero emissions - and to shift demand from data center to data center bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
10/ Electrons can do that. Molecules can't.
"Yes, but intermittency!" "Yes, but storage!" "Yes, but scale!"
OK.
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
"Yes, but intermittency!" "Yes, but storage!" "Yes, but scale!"
OK.
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
11/ Intermittency: yes, intermittency of renewable energy poses complications for grids. But the relative predictability of supply and demand and the inherent flexibility of networked power means it’s a complication grids turn out to handle quite easily. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
12/ Storage: Falling battery costs will eventually change that game entirely, obviating the need for some peaking power capacity and creating trading opportunities. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
13/ Scale: modularity is a feature, not a bug, of a world of abundant supply and uncertain demand. Building more renewable capacity to, say, displace internal combustion engines represents a huge investment. But it is also scalable and relatively quick. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
14/ Scale: you can’t drill 10% of a deepwater oil well and see how it goes; it’s a one-shot affair relying on a multi-decade demand and price projection. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
15/ One reason the majors eventually muscled into shale was because of its faster schedules. Moreover, investment in domestic power is well-suited to post-Covid economic recovery plans and increasingly fractious energy geopolitics. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
16/ Oil demand (and pricing) will recover from April’s nadir, though the extent and timing remain up for debate. Even so, the oil system’s inertia — physical, economic, political — in the face of change is much clearer. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
17/ Two energy worlds - one of molecules, one of electrons - are crashing into each other. One will recover - though the extent and timing of that recovery is up for debate. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
18/ One will continue to grow (in fact, it will be the only growth in energy this year). Change is now the constant, and the contours of growth in a time of constant change could be very different bloomberg.com/opinion/articl… /end
