My Authors
Read all threads
A colleague from Italy sent this link (I can't find the tweet so I can't properly credit them, sorry).

It is updated daily, and is from Italy's Istituto Superiore di Sanità.
Note the regular weekend dips in the TEST results (greeny blue).

But when you ask people to describe when their SYMPTOMS started, the curve is much smoother (bluey blue).
The curves are both coming down nicely with the benefit of lockdown, but they very importantly point out to ignore

the last few greeny ones (as tests are in progress) and a LONGER time range of bluey ones (as future positive-testing patients may project symptoms back to here).
All this and more, updated daily here (for the infographic click "Latest Available Data"/"Infographic"):

epicentro.iss.it/en/coronavirus/
Here is what epidemiologists I think usually call the "infection fatality rate".

It is labelled CFR but they have explained clearly in the legend that this is people with positive tests, regardless of symptoms, and they have cited a reason, namely:
ecdc.europa.eu/en/case-defini…
Anyway, it makes me feel better that I am a bit vague as to what a "Case" is, and reminds me to always check what a speaker/writer means, as there appear to be more than one commonly used meaning.
Remarkable age-sensitivity.

For each decade of increase in age, from 20's to 70's, what is the scale factor of increase in infection fatality rate, on that table?
Which of these shapes best represents the graph of infection fatality rate, from age 20 to 79?
Options
That's what shocks me.

Imagine a few thousand people start street-partying thanks to the end of the lockdown.
In this thought experiment, the partygoers consist entirely of people in their 30's and their parents, about 30 years older.

Suppose this leads to 100 funerals of the 30-somethings.

How many funerals in the 60-somethings?
Yup, so try hard to resist the temptation to visit elderly relatives for a post-lockdown knees-up.

"Please don't kill your older relatives."

(Hmm... I can see why this was not snapped up by the Prime Minister's Spin team as his new logo.)
I am disappointed with the efforts at identifying the graph with 3-fold increment per decade.

The key is not the bit at the right. That is going to be fairly "uppy".

The key is HOW MUCH smaller the left bit is.
Only one curve shows the low-age bit anywhere near low enough.
Brilliant question!
Linear.

The only giveaway was the "0" at the bottom, which I carefully placed so it was definitely the Y and not X axis.

However if I hadn't put that, it could be a log scale, and then A would be right, as you say.
Thank you for this!
Although it is population mortality, rather than infection mortality, it shows a very similar shape. Straight-line on a log scale (which means on a linear scale it grows by a constant scale factor with age).
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Prof Darrel Francis ☺ Mk CardioFellows Great Again

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!