A theoretical scenario.
Today cast-iron proof is found. Brexit 2016 Ref was corrupted, not in a small way
It would have completely changed 4 years
What's your view?
A poll below. You may suggest other answers, but you can't alone reinstate cancelled treaties or rewrite history
Today cast-iron proof is found. Brexit 2016 Ref was corrupted, not in a small way
It would have completely changed 4 years
What's your view?
A poll below. You may suggest other answers, but you can't alone reinstate cancelled treaties or rewrite history
Let's remove political obstacles
1. Everyone accepts the undeniable evidence.
2. Everyone agrees honouring democracy is the most critical factor.
3. No slimy ERG spin. We're honourable and want the RIGHT thing
4. Including Press.
5. EU will honour the outcome.
Your options
1. Everyone accepts the undeniable evidence.
2. Everyone agrees honouring democracy is the most critical factor.
3. No slimy ERG spin. We're honourable and want the RIGHT thing
4. Including Press.
5. EU will honour the outcome.
Your options
These assume you can justify your answer democratically:
1. Move forward anyway (why)
2. A holding but legal compromise (any EEA type version)
3. No man's transition land until a revote
4. Back to Square One (this might be our original Thatcher deal or on standard EU terms)
1. Move forward anyway (why)
2. A holding but legal compromise (any EEA type version)
3. No man's transition land until a revote
4. Back to Square One (this might be our original Thatcher deal or on standard EU terms)
