Here's a little message to anyone who buys unprovenanced, probably looted pre-Columbian antiquities (my animation is based on a set of unprovenanced Peruvian gold ornaments to be auctioned off my @ChristiesInc in June, ex. coll. Alsdorf: bit.ly/3cE3Tok)
These are so lovely, and so very probably ripped from a grave.
This sale - christies.com/SaleLanding/in… - contains many antiquities without pre-1970* provenance. Here's a thread of some of them. (*although, given history of looting in the region, I don't consider even pre-1970 provenance as meaning you're in the clear, ethics-wise).
Three jade beads, of similar size, style, and coloration, acquired at three different times from two dealers. To me, that says either faked by the same workshop or looted from the same tomb...
But why think about pesky issues like forgery or looting when you can have your own shiny skull ring?
Another jade carving boasts it was purchased in 1988 from "the Los Angeles collector Herbert L. Lucas Jr. and his wife, Ann Lucas, have a gallery named for their family at the Fowler Museum, Los Angeles, to which they donated a renowned collection of ancient Andean ceramics."
.@ChristiesInc specifies this ancient textile came from garments that were "so profoundly significant, as indicators of status and wealth, that they accompanied their owners to their graves." Hope the buyer thinks of the ancient desecrated grave their new wall decor came from!
Of course, no pre-Columbian sale would be complete without an Olmec baby or a Colima dog! Which are so cute and so so so very often fake.
When buying a supposedly ancient artwork, think: is this something I also like to look at on Instagram? Like, a baby, pet, or sexy person? If so, you're at greater risk of buying a forgery.
Lastly, for the benefit of anyone who wants to forge ancient art but isn't really artistically skilled: check out this beginner's forgery project! If you can carve a line, you could make one of these, with no possibility of scientific tests to foil you!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2021, a Nepali monastery told the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts that the museum possessed a sacred painting stolen from the monastery in 1967. The museum responded by offering to give the monastery a replica... if they would sign away their rights to the original. A 🧵
In August 1967, the American scholar Mary Slusser photographed the painting during an annual festival at the Yempi Mahavihara (also known as I Baha) in Patan, Nepal. In September, , as her diary shows, a dealer offered it to her.
In Nepal's Buddhist communities, sacred artifacts like the painting are owned jointly by their worshippers. They cannot be sold. Slusser's other writings show she knew this, and knew that it was against Nepal's law to export such artifacts. Still, she bought it.
Arguing that tales of dragons are evidence that dinosaurs lived in human times - humm. Arguing that anything Herodotus says was literal truth - nope. (Nice buff H-man, there, though.)
“by funding scientific studies on Native American human remains… federal agencies have created incentives for institutions to hold on to ancestors in ways that undermine the goals of NAGPRA…”
It’s not that they didn’t think about consulting tribes - it’s that they thought doing so was a bad idea for their research. Holy moly.
Inscriptions friends... is pecking out a circular letter form instead of carving freehand weird for ca. 530 BCE? (Context in next tweet.)
So, John Marshall buys this stele in fragments from 1902-1913: metmuseum.org/art/collection…. Marshall was offering £10 a letter for further fragments of the inscription, or £500 for the rest of it.
In 1907, here's the part of the inscription he has (left) and two more parts he's offered by a dealer in Athens (right). The new parts have the cautious circles.