I have to say, the NYT’s hitpiece on Ronan Farrow is so bad, it is taxing to even finish it.
It is exactly what it purports to report on: a bob-and-weave between anecdotal comments and unsupported, sweeping conclusions.
If it wasn’t so wholly poor, I’d pull it apart.
1/3
It is exactly what it purports to report on: a bob-and-weave between anecdotal comments and unsupported, sweeping conclusions.
If it wasn’t so wholly poor, I’d pull it apart.
1/3
The New York Times is no stranger to low-water marks in the Trump Era.
After all, it is the paper that published the diametrically false claim that the FBI saw no links between the Trump Campaign and Russia. It is the paper that ran the Ukraine story as being truly about Biden.
After all, it is the paper that published the diametrically false claim that the FBI saw no links between the Trump Campaign and Russia. It is the paper that ran the Ukraine story as being truly about Biden.
And the New York Times is the outlet that frequently frees its reporters to pollute Twitter with petulant clapbacks at real, fair and accurate criticism.
This piece achieves one objective, though not the one intended, of reminding us how often and egregiously the NYT fails.
//
This piece achieves one objective, though not the one intended, of reminding us how often and egregiously the NYT fails.
//
