This was a complex case that started w/ chest pain, fevers, weakness, etc. After seeing the labs, I guessed the diagnosis. @CPSolvers@rabihmgeha@DxRxEdu@RosenelliEM
2/ Cognitive autopsies are always valuable - for mistakes and for guessing the correct answer. Did I make a sound diagnosis, or was I just lucky? Why did I suggest Hepatitis A?
Let's examine the liver tests and how they stimulated my thinking:
3/
I divide liver tests into 3 categories - cellular destruction:
AST 2160 ALT 1750; obstruction: alkaline phophatase 240 T Bili 3.4 Direct 2.4; loss of factory function: albumin 2.3 but PT not reported.
Thus, I emphasized massive acute cellular destruction.
4/ What can cause such massive cellular destruction?
Shock - no evidence of shock
Drugs - no evidence of acetaminophen or herbal "remedies"
Viruses - A, B, C, D, E, HSV, EBV, CMV
5/ I do not expect any of the genetic diseases to have levels this high. Autoimmune hepatitis usually has a more insidious presentation.
We were not given any reason for B, C, D or E. B & C - IV drugs, possibly sex (B>C), tattoos. E usually travel overseas
6/ HSV is certainly possible but very unusual
EBV and CMV probably usually do not have elevations at this level
A is ubiquitous - need a diet history - but certainly presents like this.
7/
I would have gotten the US that they got which excluded severe hepatobiliary disease. I think the alkaline phosphatase would be higher with cholangiocarcinoma or common duct stone or primary sclerosing cholangitis.
8/ Apparently severe acute hepatitis A is an unusual hospital diagnosis. @tony_breu shared a wonderful article he authored: A Multicenter Study Into Causes of Severe Acute Liver Injury cghjournal.org/article/S1542-… - hepatitis A was 1/400+
9/ In retrospect I think my reasoning was solid. Most hepatitis A does not lead to hospital admission. The liver tests stimulated my reasoning. Hepatitis A likely caused enough stress to produce the other symptoms.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ #UncleBob - on giving formative feedback on rounds. First, make it clear in your expectations discussion (day 1) that you will critique many things and label them as feedback. #MedEd@CPSolvers@uabimres
2/ Especially with new presentations, stop after the HPI and both praise the story and provide suggestions on making the presentation better. Emphasize the role of storytelling as separate from having taken a good history.
3/ Understand that when you ask questions - some are hard and some are easy. When a learner answers a hard question well - praise them and note that you are giving positive feedback.
1/Time for a #UncleBob screed. The question Andrew raises is a very interesting one. First I must provide my understanding of the purpose of teaching ward attending physicians.
I divide this into providing excellent patient care & helping learners grow.
2/ Providing high quality care is a given. Excellent ward attendings evolve with clinical practice (consider the 10,000 hour "rule"). But I would argue that both outpatient clinical practice and inpatient practice are beneficial.
3/ And I believe I learn more in a month of ward attending than if I did a month of solo patient care. Patient care requires attention to detail, diagnostic excellence, management efficiency and proper use of tests and consultants.
2/ Some basic physiology - we metabolize around 1 mEq of H+ daily from our diet. We buffer that acid using titratable (phosphate) and non-titratable (NH4+) acids.
The phosphate pathway does not vary much, but our kidneys can normally control the ammonium pathway
3/ Where does the ammonia come from? Glutamine -> glutamate under the enzyme glutaminase produces NH3
Here is the interesting part. Increased K inhibits this enzyme, thus we produce insufficient NH3 to buffer our dietary intake.
#UncleBob posted this link yesterday. Here are a few thoughts on the article. “I don’t know what’s the matter with people: they don’t learn by understanding; they learn by some other way—by rote or something. Their knowledge is so fragile!”
"The difference between reasoning by first principles and reasoning by analogy is like the difference between being a chef and being a cook. If the cook lost the recipe, he’d be screwed."
This is so relevant to those who grow and those who stagnate.
"Some of us are naturally skeptical of what we’re told. Maybe it doesn’t match up to our experiences. Maybe it’s something that used to be true but isn’t true anymore. And maybe we just think very differently about something." - The best diagnosticians always question previous dx
1/ Here is the story - hopefully instructive. Patient (ESRD w/ dialysis) admitted 3 weeks previously for dyspnea. Portable CXR shows small pleural effusion & some haziness - pneumonia or atelectasis. No fever, no increased WBC, no productive cough. Discussed now w/ radiology
2/ Radiologist teaches our team - pneumonia is a CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS - cannot make the diagnosis by CXR/CT scan.
Patient discharged - readmitted for more dyspnea - now with moderate pericardial effusion and large left pleural effusion. Receive furosemide & then thoracentesis
1/ #UncleBob hopes those on the fence about vaccines will understand this
Weekly COVID-19 death rate via CDC:
Unvaccinated: 9.7 deaths per 100k
Fully vaccinated: 0.7 deaths per 100k
Boosted: 0.1 deaths per 100k
2/ Yes you can get omicron even if you are boosted
BUT
You are less likely to get infected
If you get infected you are much less likely to need hospitalization
If you need hospitalization, you are much less likely to need ICU care, and MUCH less likely to die
3/ Would you turn down medical care if you got sick?
I assume no - almost everyone comes to the hospital and ask for everything
Then why would you not accept a free prevention tool?