I'm following the massive spike in #QudsDay after an Iranian conspiracy theorist with a history of anti-Semitic comments encouraged his followers to get it trending in a Twitter "storm" tonight. 328,000 tweets sent. BUT, only 27,000 unique accounts are engaging with the hashtag
This means most of the traffic has been achieved by mass retweeting, in fact, 76% of it. Notice the massive drop in numbers once you exclude retweets from the traffic. 81,000 original tweets from 18,000 unique accounts. Most of the tweets are in English, not Persian
The most popular tweets all came from Mr Raefipour's accounts. I previously mentioned one of his conspiracy theories in a piece I wrote about coronavirus misinformation in Iran. He has a huge following among young Iranian hardliners
Let's look at some of the most active accounts tweeting the hashtag. 527, 512, 502, 489, 483, 459, 451, 435, 434, 392, 391 and 380 tweets from each account in less than six hours. That's not organic behaviour. But these Twitter "storms" have become so common on Iranian Twitter
You can see the beginning and subsequent rise of the hashtag in this GIF. Clearly, most of the traffic came from inside Iran. A second "storm" has been planned for tomorrow morning
So round two of the "storm" happened this morning. It was smaller than last night. 306,000 tweets by 30,000 unique accounts. Exclude the retweets and you end up with 55,000 tweets from 16,000 unique accounts. Once again, the hashtag was mainly driven by mass retweeting
83% of the overall traffic was driven by retweets today, compared with 76% last night. We usually view anything more than 75-80% as a sign the traffic is not entirely organic and features some coordination. In this case, there's no doubt the hashtag was coordinated and organised
Let's look at the whole campaign on Thu-Fri then. 685,000 tweets. You can see the two spikes in traffic here, and the specific times of the day when it was at peak traffic. 79% of the campaign's content was made up of retweets
The number of unique accounts who took part in the two storms was 53,000. Once again, all the most popular tweets came from Mr Raefipour's accounts. They were even more popular that a tweet by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei's official English account
Just take a look at the number of times these accounts have tweeted the hashtag, between 500 to 1,000 tweets each, all in less than 24 hours. This is clear spamming on their part to amplify the hashtag
Let's examine these two accounts, for instance. "reyhane" has retweeted the hashtag 1,000 times since last night. "Rey.haane" - joined Twitter in May 2020 - has done the same 777 since times last night. Both have the same profile photo and only retweet content. Coincidence?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While Elon Musk recommends sending around X posts so people can "learn the truth", here's a thread of viral misinformation on X about Hurricane Milton.
Alex Jones baselessly claims hurricanes Milton and Helene were deliberately started by the US government as "weather weapons".
This post by one of X's most prominent conspiracy theorists, viewed 4.8 million times, suggests without any evidence that Hurricane Milton is a result of geo-engineering.
Conspiracy theorist Stew Peters claims Hurricane Milton was pre-planned to directly hit Tampa Bay, in a post viewed 4 million times.
Obviously, Hurricane Milton is not pre-planned. No-one can plan to create hurricanes.
A Russia-based disinformation network run by a former Florida cop has published a new fabricated story on a fake news website called "Seattle Tribune".
It baselessly claims Ukrainain President Zelensky has secretly purchased a Mercedes 770 used by Hitler. It's nonsense.
The story refers to this doctored picture of a Mercedes 770 near the presidential office in Kyiv, posted on Telegram.
But that Telegram channel has never posted the pic, and the Mercedes in it has been lifted from the image on the right. Note the same reflections on both cars.
As is often the case with the network of fake news websites posing as local news outlets run by Moscow-based John Mark Dougan, the "Seattle Tribune" website was set up only five days ago, specifically to post this fake story.
There's no record of such a news outlet in Seattle.
Immediately after the Southport attack, baseless rumours began spreading online.
The main source of rumours has been a report by an obscure US "news" website that falsely claims the suspect is an "asylum seeker" named "Ali Al-Shakati", who "arrived in the UK by boat last year".
Merseyside Police has confirmed that the suspect was born in Cardiff, and has yet to identify the 17-year-old.
The report also adds that the suspect was "on MI6 watch list", despite the fact that it is MI5, not MI6, that deals with domestic counter-terrorism cases.
The name "Ali Al-Shakati" has since been widely shared online in misleading posts viewed by millions.
Some other outlets, including Russia's RT news channel, have also reported this name, citing the US-based website.
Pro-Kremlin influencers claim the captain of the Dali ship is a Ukrainian.
But online records show a Ukrainian man was the Dali's captain from March to July 2016. The ship that hit the bridge reportedly had an all-Indian crew.
Claims by influencers such as Alex Jones and Andrew Tate that the Baltimore Bridge collapsed due to a "cyber-attack" have been viewed millions of times.
Maryland Governor Wes Moore has said the early investigation points to an accident, with "no evidence of a terrorist attack".
This video, viewed 1.4 million times, claims to show evidence of pre-installed explosives causing the Baltimore Bridge collapse.
What the video shows is not explosives, but most likely electrical wires catching sparks.