Thread by @mayloveheal

i believe that no human being has the right to imprison an other human being

forced quarantine and forced self-isolation as it is threatened in switzerland

nzzas.nzz.ch/schweiz/corona…

"Jetzt kommt die Zwangsquarantäne
Die ersten Kantone beginnen wieder mit dem Contact-Tracing. Wer mit einer kranken Person engen Kontakt hatte, muss in kontrollierte Quarantäne."

is immoral at its very base

the whole discussion about contact tracing applications being voluntary to use ... is a detraction ... because only a few people have courage enough to question the underlying assumption of it being okay to force somebody into quarantine

i believe that my personal health condition is of no one elses concern

how i choose to stay healthy or how i deal with any kind of virus or bacteria what comes into my life

is only my affair

any intrusion from the governement into the personal relationship of a human being with its thinking, its feelings and its body ... is immoral

the underlying problem of the so called modern society in europe is that most people are agreeing with the regional and nation state administrations taking responsibility over the response of a human beings relationship to its own level of health

an expression of this giving away of personal responsability over ones own health ... is the regional and nation state demanding from the citizen to pay monthly a fee towards so called .... sickness insurance ... krankenkasse in german

its only since about 10 or 20 years since this became a mandatory thing in switzerland, before it was voluntary to be insured against costs what come up by using health care system

i have recently written a proposal how this could again be transformed into a voluntary situation where every citizen could choose with whom else one would want to be together in a solidarity circle, where all members of the circle would define what kind of treatments

would be financed by the community and which ones not

facebook.com/notes/andreas-…

another reason why an imposed forced upon quarantine is immoral:
the very contact with nature,spending time in the forest, walking on the earth,feeling the wind on ones skin, breathing unpolluted air in the proximity of trees
is helping to stay healty and or improve ones health

a human being what is quarantined is cut off from this most basic contact to the natural environment ...

and even more is dependant on the condition of the regional or national state governement and its executing administrations ...

to choose what kind of food one would like to eat also is an important contribution towards an individual human being maintaining or improving its own health

under forced upon quarantine such choices become very limited and are dependant on the goodwill of the adminstrations what impose the quarantine

once again i voice my opposition to any one human being who intends to imprison a fellow human being:

i do not give consent to any forced upon quarantine

i believe that every human being is basicly sovereign over its own thinking, feeling and body processes

imprisoning an other human being robs the individual human being to exercise its freedom to choose at all times where one wants to be with whom

as a consequence ... i believe that the local community what is fully sovereign ... what is not accepting the regional state as well as not accepting the nation state dominating from above ...

a local community what creates its own laws and rules what are only valid in this local territory

i believe that there is one possibility what such a sovereign local community could choose when it is confronted with an individual what is absolutely not willing to reform itself

... an individual what is after very thorough efforts to understand its situation ... is finally not able to live with the other members of the communtiy in peace and understanding

expulsion

following this logic of basic morality

regarding the covid ... corona thing

it would be better if the ones who believe in covid ... corona ... being a real danger to the community

( i do not believe the corona virus to be a danger but believe it to be an assistant of healing ... the real danger being the undealt with, not healed chronic health conditions what keep people enslaved to pharmaceutical medications, surgeries etc. )

if a local community what would agree on covid being a problem... would ban the one who is accused of having this or that virus from not entering this or that public facility ...

but would leave it up to each shop and each restaurant wether or not they would want to admit

someone who is not willing to submit itself under the testing-dictate of corona/covid fear

so ... one conclusion of thinking about basic morality ... could be ... to let these people have contact with each other who believe in the personal sovereignity ...

and on the other side let these people have exclusive contact with each other who fear the contact with people who are not willing to submit themselves to the covid-corona-scare

the only forum i believe to have any moral grounds to create rules and laws is the full assembly of all human beings who live here and now, in this neighbourhood, in this village, in this city-district

i could understand a local community what does decide with a high enough majority ... a qualified majority ( 60 to 75 percent ) ... that this or that kind of individual would not be allowed to enter a shop or use public buildings

but there is absolutly no good reason for hindering a human being going for a walk in the fresh air, spending time in nature

on the contrary ... regarding to health ... it does even worsen the situation and creates isolation what is not helping the health

everyone who is intending to assist in the imprisonement of others ... becomes itself a tool of the powers who are exercising their dominance over the masses

this whole corona topic is a challenge for everyone of us

on which side are we on

are we supporting imprisonment or freedom

simple

i like the idea of each shop making up its own rules

as it is in the restaurants

if an owner of a restaurant does not like a visitor ...
i believe the owner has the right to ask the guest to leave
for whatever reason

it all comes down to personal choices ...

mmmh... having said all this ... i would like to clearly position myself once again :

i believe that no one human being has the right to imprison any other human being

but also ...

no one human being has the right to force another human being to help a fellow human being

the choice of wanting to host a guest should allways be a free decision

everyone should be able to at all times choose with whom one wants to be in what kind of contact

@threadreaderapp unroll