Thread by @SethAbramson

Want to know what the Holy Grail of American journalism is right now?

Discovering the story of Trump's emergency (mid-"cold") visit to Walter Reed military hospital days after U.S. military intelligence discovered there was a new virus in China.

Whoever gets it gets a Pulitzer.

PS/ The first comprehensive narrative of that event to be published in the United States will be published in PROOF OF CORRUPTION. But I fully expect that reporting on this issue will continue until the incontrovertable truth is revealed. It's already clear the truth will be bad.

PS2/ Many don't realize that Trump wouldn't have gone to a military hospital for any of the common bases he might have had for an emergency visit to a hospital.

For an acute issue, he'd have gone to George Washington. For a non-acute issue, he would've used his White House team.

PS3/ Major media reports already establish—citing the top experts in the country—that there had to be some reason Trump went specifically to a military installation on November 16, 2019, rather than using any of the myriad options he would've had before him for medical treatment.

PS4/ The only known reason to go to Walter Reed would've been a presidential physical, which is why the WH *tried* that explanation. But not only did they abandon it, it doesn't fit *any* of the facts.

So I laid out the whole story in PROOF OF CORRUPTION: amazon.com/dp/1250272998?…

PS5/ To my knowledge no one has ever seen Trump carry WH files outside in the whole of his presidency. Yet when Trump was hustled into a black van to go to a military installation on an emergency basis, he was holding documents apparently he wasn't able to give to even his aides.

PS6/ Can anyone imagine the most powerful man in the world having an acute medical event and not only *not* going to the hospital his protocols say he should be going to, but *also* having someone on his staff say, "Here, hold these *heavy folders*, also." Nope. With good reason.

PS7/ Those who think Trump was trying to hide something on his body are spinning a conspiracy theory that doesn't comport with the facts and has nothing to do with my book. My book sticks to major-media investigative reports—which point toward, in any case, a shocking revelation.

PS8/ Timeline:

Nov. 9 to Nov. 16, 2019: U.S. military transmits intelligence on a new virus in China to White House/NSC (ABC News, The Times of Israel, others).

Nov. 9 to Nov. 16, 2019: Trump develops symptoms of a bad cold.

Nov. 16, 2019: Trump rushed to a military hospital.

PS9/ Chinese social media metadata and nonpublic case information—and emerging timeline data coming from France/the US—confirms new virus chatter in China in either late October or early November 2019, *before* the official first *confirmed* case *or* the first U.S. intel report.

PS10/ In other words, the timeline data we have from major media and scientific research confirms the availability of emerging "mystery virus" intelligence to the U.S. military between November 9 and November 16. The "first case" (11/16, US time) data China put out is inaccurate.

PS11/ After Trump returned from Walter Reed, a number of strange things happened. He was apparently cloistered for a couple days, and there was no medical briefing held. Then the story he had put out about why he went to Walter Reed fell apart completely, and was never addressed.

PS12/ It's *critical* that we discuss all the facts of the situation without also attempting to devise a theory of the case that's then presented as definitive. We *don't know* what happened—we can only say what theory of the case all the evidence supports and keep investigating.

PS13/ On social media, enemies of the truth on both left and right have a long-manifested habit of deliberately positioning ongoing investigations as completed, definitive conspiracy theories to discredit them. I was a criminal investigator; what I do—all I do—is gather evidence.

PS14 Ask me if the hundreds of major-media investigative reports from around the world I've read about what happened in 2019 establish with certainty a series of events, I'll say no. But certain White House lies are *precluded*—and other possibilities are *supported by evidence*.

PS15/ And it should be absolutely clear to anyone who's read this feed for any period of time that I'm only stating here a part of what I know. The full story—with all the available major-media evidence—appears in PROOF OF CORRUPTION. It's too long to go through it all here. /end

NOTE/ I'll say it here and probably 100 times more before Proof of Corruption is published: I've *zero* interest in conspiracy theories about the Walter Reed visit. I *don't* believe Trump received a vaccine for anything. All I did was curate hundreds of major-media data points.