As we commemorate the #SemaineSanglante - crushing of the Paris Commune 149 years ago this week - today I'm focusing on Victorine Brocher... cantiniere of the Turcos de la Commune, and her action at the Bastille on Weds 24 May....
By 24 May the Communards had been pushed out of the Hotel de Ville and were defending the Bastille/Place de Voges. Victorine's unit took position at 3 Boulevard Beaumarchais (now a pharmacy) with an excellent field of fire over the entire intersection...
Victorine's husband was a regular soldier in an elite unit, which partially went over to the Commune - so not a National Guard battalion. They were called the Turcos de la Commune, and were similar to zouaves... she was technically the cantiniere...
They were shelled and outflanked: Victorian tried to place a red flag on a barricade but in the process several of the unit got killed... so they retreated towards Belleville...
Victorian survived and wrote the memoir Souvenirs d'une mort vivante... which I will come back to on the 26/28th - she ended up in Lausanne and married the anarchist leader Gustave Brocher...
Her original name was Victorine Louise Malenfant. This carte de visite in Northwestern University's collection is labelled "Louise Bonenfant, cantiniere". Side by side with her in later life it looks possible they are the same person. Any face recognition experts out there???
Victorine and Gustave rocked up in London just in time for the famous anarchist conference of 1891, where the census captures them living in Akerman Road, near Kennington, where I live! With a house full of, er, youngish anarchist sounding people and of course a servant...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the name of public service, and as ex-economics editor of BBC Newsnight, I offer to do a zoom call, tonight, with any Labour MP who wants to understand why bond markets do not "fall into line" with governments. 1/
2/ Because pension funds have moved from defined benefits to payouts dependent on the stock market, they don't need to hold so much government debt (orange bit) ...a third is now held by foreign banks (blue bit) ... the red bit by the Bank of England...
3/ And because HMT favours issuing long-dated bonds, and because the UK suffers unique stresses due to decades of privatisation, ill health and ageing, (and Truss), our borrowing costs are an outlier...
I understand MPs' frustration with @Keir_Starmer speech, on top of election losses, but please look rationally at the risks we are running. Here's a visual guide... let me talk through it...🧵1/~
2/ In the left column are all potential options from MPs' discontent with Starmer. I am discontented too, and want more radical policies... I doubt a Streeting challenge would rattle the markets badly - though it risks doing so simply from the law of unintended consequences...
3/ Any soft-left/Burnham challenge that did not have its programme fiscally watertight risks setting off the whole cascade in this chart *even before it succeeds*...
I don't want Keir to resign - nor do I want him to set a timetable for resigning - I want the Labour Party to diagnose its own problems and the wider fragmenting political landscape and face facts: working class people are in a zero sum game and we need to be on their side ... 1/
2/ This is not the end of UK social democracy but it has to build a broader coalition to resist the extremism of the right and the new Islamist sectarianism. Calling them what they are would be a start!
3/ the essential formula has to be left on the economy, traditional on defence, crime and foreign policy. I stood for selection 3x on those politics and was twice blocked by the "process" ...
Four moves just happened in the US-Iran battle: Trump leaks peace conditions; Iran makes extreme counter-demands; Trump threatens to destroy energy plants; Iran threatens to destroy Gulf desalination plants... this is "escalate to de-escalate"... 1/
2/ analysis: First off, Trump is explicitly threatening a war crime; the UK should have no part in that. Iran's threat is also criminal. Second - Israel seems absent from the exchange. Third: Iran's maximalist demands are actually a plea for inclusion in a rules based order -
3/ If either escalation threat were carried out we would see an epic refugee and humanitarian crisis: Southern Caucasus, Iraq, Türkiye,Turkmenistan all vulnerable
The British government is not "confused" or unclear - it's been crystal clear it did not take part in the US/Israeli attack on Iran because there is no legal basis to do so; in addition its aims are ill defined... 1/ so Labour MPs need to get real...
2/ We're under political attack from a Tory party that would have willingly breached the UN Charter. We're sticking by the Charter - everything we've done so far is lawful under Article 51...
3/ We're also under attack from the Greens who want to leave NATO, & Plaid and the SNP who want to dismember the United Kingdom. You were elected as social democrats, act like one: get behind the government and deliver a massive majority for strong, lawful conduct during this war
As Morgan McSweeney resigns - here's some basic politics for any member of the Labour Party: 1/ We cannot have a leadership contest now. Why? Because the bond market is a "daily referendum on UK political stability"...the right wing press baying for Keir to resign know this ...
2/ The rat pack of podcasters and YouTubers will have a field day stoking up chaos... a doom loop of bad headlines and soaring bond yields. Therefore Keir Starmer has to remain PM. Let's have a clear report from the ISC - and it should not be difficult to get to the point...
3/ ... did the DV process throw up any problems with Mandelson? Did the security services warn anyone? Once we have that information there is a story to tell about what went wrong ...