My Authors
Read all threads
What this dishonest Liberal idiot misunderstands is that the organizers of the HK riots are fundamentally not driven by a desire for political rights, but not for imagined liberties lost but for status threatened for a younger generation of Cuhk Kongers. The 2016 legco farce
involving "Baggio" Leung and Yau Wai Ching said everything that needed to be said about Hong Kong's youth political culture. They say Democracy and Freedom to collaborating Media agencies, but it was not about it. It was always about the Locusts. All but the most deluded
mainlanders eventually came to recognize this and the only ones left to support them are shengmubiao, assorted homosexuals, and out and out race traitors. Thus every opportunity to tactically wring concessions from the Communist Party but hitting their own area of vulnerability
was never even approached. This is because the goal was never to achieve anything but simply to spit in Chinese faces. "We tried peace democratic approaches" cries the Cukhroach. Wrong. Where the Party has made known concessions to the Chinese public is on issues where sufficient
popularity could mobilize cross segments of Chinese civil society into public action. Get enough mainlainders, particularly Beijingers, sympathetic to a cause and it lowers room for manuever for the Party to deploy the full arsenal of tools for overt oppression. The key point is
what do Hong Kongers and Mainlanders share in common and where could that have been used to engage in collective action. That would have instantly drew the party eye. For example, the ridiculous real estate prices in Hong Kong, a problem shared with the mainland. Rent protests
especially targeted at the oligarchic classes that HK relies on support would have immediately drawn mainlander sympathy and support. The more noise they made in this sector, the more solidarity Beijingers would have felt, the more pressure on Beijing to finally put the boot on
HK property developers. It would have served as a nexus of further collaboration for collective action. The Party does not want Hong Kongers collaborating with mass movements in the mainland and would have immediately moved to appease lest disturbances spread. The Cuhkroaches
never even thought of such because as the faggot Liberals supporters are never willing to admit that the movement was never about rights but separatism. Instead of the 996 toxic work culture, another common problem facing China and Hong Kong, your precious organizers decided that
groveling like a traitorous little bitch to Washington was the optimal solution to get Beijing to make concessions. If this wasn't stupidity of the highest imaginable caliber to push of all Beijing's red buttons to crush you, that's only because getting it was never the goal.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Duke of Qin

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!