I think of it a little differently
I think of it as taking ownership over your own value
nytimes.com/2020/05/24/bus…
If the company is profitable, they are able to turn your work into more dollars than they are paying you
You are earning less than you are worth
For those folks, working at a publication may be a good deal.
But not everyone feels that way.
The pub sells more subscriptions or ads
But you don't get a raise
The publication keeps the surplus
And, if you quit or get laid off, you don't take that value with you
It's not for everyone. But many people could be successful at this model.
Some pieces require hours of research, some days of reporting, some weeks.
And it can be lonely.
But I wouldn't trade it for anything.
But these journalists don't have anything they can take with them
And very few places are hiring
For now that's true. But the NYT has been around for 168 years. Most of these publications are just a few months old. Give it a little time.
And we are just getting starting.
Medium owns the relationship with readers and the subscription revenue
Then they pay you each month based on an opaque and changing formula
Each month, you start again at zero
Think about the NYT. It has 3.9 MILLION digital subscriptions.
Sounds like a lot, right?
But the NYT also has 1700 journalists.
That's only 2300 subscribers per journalist
But the point stands because you can make a very nice living off of 2300 subscribers.
And once you get there you can build to 4600 and 6600.
Is it easy. No, it's quite hard.
You just need a few thousand.
It's something that is obtainable for quite a few people -- especially experienced journalists who know what they are doing and how to break news and just got laid off