This is due to questions about the speed, timing, storage & submission of samples.
#fisayoscovid19series
1/15
Although ill, the nurse had been very stable and was being managed for what looked like malaria.
2/15
She was sent to the hospital’s isolation centre and her samples were collected on Wednesday.
3/15
Many who saw the late nurse’s chest x-ray are convinced it was a “classical COVID-19 x-ray”.
4/15
5/15
And these were a special breed of x-rays that weren’t seen until now.
6/15
Those who've followed this series for a while will recall my 10-tweet thread of May 1 on the peculiar chest x-rays that proved the strange deaths being covered up in Kano were COVID-19-related.
7/15
Back to Cross River, lots of questions need to be answered if the Ben Ayade government must convince us all that the state is indeed COVID-19-free:
8/15
What about other hospitals in Calabar & the rest of the 18 LGAs of the state?
Does it mean that in a state of 4million people, not more than 1 person met the COVID-19 case definition outside UCTH in 3 months?
9/15
Half of the samples were collected post-mortem because of delayed response. Why is this delay a pattern?
10/15
There is no sample that was collected in Cross River and sent for testing within 24 hours. Not one.
All the samples spent the night in Calabar; all stayed a minimum of 24 hours in the state. Why?
11/15
4. Nobody knows anything about the storage of collected samples or what exactly is being sent or the viability of the samples.
12/15
5. Why is there an increase in deaths from COVID-19-like symptoms? It doesn’t matter that they’re in aliquots, unlike what was witnessed in Kano.
13/15
6. Why are there very classical COVID-19-like chest x-rays, even if the results are coming back negative?
14/15
Until these questions have all been answered by the state govt, that claim of zero COVID-19 case in Cross River will receive little acclaim beyond the State House & the camps of Ayade’s loyalists.