For 15 years, I’ve been studying 1960s civil rights protests with particular attention to how nonviolent and violent actions by activists & police influence media, elites, public opinion & voters. I'm thrilled some of that work was published last week. 1/… Image
These striking from photos from yesterday’s protests evoke some of the surprising lessons of 1960s. Consider the narrative these images construct for the larger public. How do these images fit our ideas of who is a “good guy” or who is a “bad guy”? 2/
Now, imagine a simple model in which activists opt to engage in nonviolent or violent resistance and then the state responds with typical or excess force. (To be clear, the world is more complicated but these simplifying assumptions helps us describe some common patterns.) 3/ Image
What was surprising was that while nonviolence could be an effective tactic, the best outcomes for the civil rights movement came when nonviolent protesters were met with brutal state repression that was broadcast around the world. See @repjohnlewis on Bloody Sunday in Selma. 4/ Image
Events in which both protesters and the state are relatively peaceful could be effective. But, as one reporter noted about a nonviolent civil rights protest in Hattiesburg, MS, “…even an unprecedented picket line was a dull story. In such situations, blood and guts are news.” 5/
1960s activists understood this: “movement leaders & some segregationist leaders were studying the press: how it reacted, what made news & what did not. One thing was unambiguous: the greater the violence, the bigger the news, especially if it could be photographed or filmed.” 6/
I looked at @nytimes coverage of black-led protests in the 1960s and, consistent with what movement leaders intuited & scholars like @EricaChenoweth & Dan Gillion have shown, more violence was associated with more coverage, longer articles & articles closer to front page. 7/ Image
So, violence by either side (or both) helped to generate more media but news coverage can portray a movement sympathetically or unsympathetically. This is where the combination of activist tactics and state response really matters. 8/
Comparing the most common terms used in thousands of news articles about 1960s civil rights protests, what I found was terms like march, demonstration & civil rights were used much more frequently when protesters were nonviolent and the state was violent (relative to reverse). 9/ Image
When protesters initiated violence & the state was relatively restrained, however, terms like riot, violence & night were much more common. One example of this type occurred in Albany, GA where the Chief of Police used mass arrests while trying to minimize violent repression. 10/
In July 1962 an initially nonviolent protest escalated to include protester-initiated violence. The @nytimes ran a front page story about how a “crowd of 2,000 angry Negroes” had been dispersed after “[b]ricks, bottles & rocks were thrown towards more than 100 city policemen” 11/
Of course, sympathetic press might not be enough to move a bigoted mass public. Did nonviolent civil rights protests shift media coverage *and* public opinion? To test this I compared trends in protest activity, front page headlines that mention civil rights & public opinion. 12/ Image
The plot above shows as nonviolent protest activity increases, we see spikes in front page headlines that mention civil rights (and related terms like voting rights) and we also observe significantly more people respond the “most important problem” in America is civil rights. 13/
Similarly, with significant protester-initiated violence (whether or not the police are violent), we see increases in protest activity associated with headlines that mention “riots” and more people answer that the “most important problem” in America is crime and riots. 14/ Image
The shifts in public opinion, also influenced voting. Running a variety of statistical tests on presidential elections from 1964 to 1972, I found counties close to nonviolent protests saw presidential Democratic vote share among whites increase 1.3-1.6%. /15
Protester-initiated violence (again, irrespective of police violence), helped move public towards concern for “social control.” In 1968, I find violent protests likely caused a 1.6-7.9% shift among whites towards Nixon’s “law & order” campaign and helped tipped the election. 16/ Image
In sum, I find violent tactics by the state or protesters operate as a double-edged sword. State repression subjugates activists but focuses media attention on the concerns of nonviolent protesters. 17/
In contrast, violence by protesters can powerfully express discontent and offers a means of self-defense but, in the glare of mass media, is expected to strengthen the coalition of those looking to thwart minority demands. 18/
Returning to the protest photos from @CarlosGphoto, one unnerving but maybe encouraging lesson from the 1960s is that while state repression can result in injury & death, images of police SWAT teams vs images of fleeing children likely helps the movement seeking #JusticeForFloyd.
For the full analysis, below are links to the final paper and an ungated pre-print:

Final version:…

Ungated pre-print: Image
Finally, for a glimpse into the backstory of this research and some of what helped me persevere when times were tough, see this thread from last week.
Note: Nonviolent protest can work without repression, it’s just harder to generate media without drama. Big events like March on Washington or telegenic events like ACT-UP putting a giant condom over Jesse Helms’ home are examples of direct action generating sympathetic coverage.
Addendum: There have been some question about correlation vs causation in the estimated relationships btwn protests & voting. We obviously can’t randomly assign some counties to have protests so I try a variety of methods to approximate something like that with historical data. Image
The figure above shows estimates from 15 statistical models. First, these are called fixed effect models. What’s powerful is that anything that doesn’t change much between 1964 & 1972, such as institutions or culture, is controlled for by comparing a county to itself.
Second, there are 3 different clusters & each cluster has 5 models:
— for all counties
— 90% white counties
— counties with matched “twins” that look very similar on variety of traits except one had protests
— 90% white matched counties
— spatial models accounting for “neighbors”
To summarize, counties within 100 miles of a nonviolent protest in models 1-5 vote for the more egalitarian coalition. Conversely, for counties near violent protest activity, measured by participants 6-10 or arrests 11-15, we see voters shift toward the “law & order” coalition.
Further, to try and approximate random assignment of violent protests, I use rainfall in April of 1968. Why April? Martin Luther King, Jr is assassinated on April 4 & 137 violent protests follow his murder. Prior work shows rainfall predicts uprisings (↑ rain, ↓ protest). Image
I use rainfall in April to predict protests & then voting in 1968. The week before Apr 4, rainfall does not predict voting. In latter half of April, also no effect. Only in week following King's assassination (with 95% of protests) does rain in April predict voting in November. Image
Rainfall is acting like a coin toss, some counties got rainfall & others were dry. Without an alternate explanation for why rainfall in only one week in April predicts voting in November, the best explanation is violent protest *caused* some white voters to shift vote to Nixon.
As we know, with the electoral college system, what matters is not individual voters or even counties but states. This is the actual electoral college map in 1968 that Nixon won. Note, George Wallace, an avowed segregationist, ran as a third party candidate. Image
To estimate electoral effect of violent protest, I simulate a counterfactual election under the scenario that Dr King was not assassinated & 137 violent protests did not occur. Running 1968 election 10,000 times, Humphrey, lead author of Civil Rights Act, typically beats Nixon. Image
Nixon is often credited with winning in 1968 using a ”Southern Strategy.” In this counterfactual with no violent uprisings, however, Humphrey picks up Delaware, Illinois, Missouri, NJ & Ohio. In other words, Nixon won by appealing to white moderates in the Midwest & Mid-Atlantic. Image
In sum, using a wide range of statistical methods to try and compare “apples to apples,” I find proximity to nonviolent protest grew the coalition aligned with black interests and proximity to violent protest caused a meaningful number of whites to shift towards “law and order.”
Despite enormous barriers, black activists overcame structural biases, framed news, directed elite discourse, swayed public opinion & won at ballot box. An “eye for an eye” in response to violent repression may be moral & just but this research suggests it may not be strategic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Omar Wasow

Omar Wasow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @owasow

31 Jul
Striking how often opponents of various public health measures use analogies that willfully disregard spillover effects. Ignoring how Covid is highly contagious could generously be seen as a logical fallacy but, in reality, a false analogy is really just another kind of lie.
Mandating driving on one side of the road would be incredibly effective in combating crashes but it would be wrong to rob someone of the choice of what they do with their car.
John Stuart Mill, a key author of Western concept of freedom, wrote that liberty (or freedom) means “doing as we like, subject to such consequences as may follow, without impediment from our fellow creatures, *as long as what we do does not harm them*…”…
Read 8 tweets
29 Jul
~27% of African Americans in Texas are vaccinated. CDC suggests national numbers are similarly low despite a 3X rate of hospitalization due to Covid compared to Whites and a 2X rate of death. Where is the reporting that goes deeper than “Tuskegee” to make sense of the disparity?
Medical anthropologists conducted 200 in-depth interviews and found ”Our participant testimony shows that many unvaccinated people are not ‘vaccine hesitant’ but rather ’vaccine impeded.’”…
”Christina, in San Diego, cannot get vaccinated, she said, because she has no one to care for her babies should she fall ill with side effects. Her husband, similarly, can’t take time off from his job – ’It doesn’t work that way.’”…
Read 12 tweets
27 Jul
A good way to understand Trump’s coalition through a cross-national lens: @Pavithra_Suri explains how in India ”status politics enables anti-redistributive coalitions. Poor and wealthy voters unite to defend status interests, and protect institutions key to maintaining status.”
Two implications of @Pavithra_Suri’s analysis: 1/ egalitarian-oriented pushes will tend to generate hierarchy restoring counter-mobilizations. 2/ Egalitarian-oriented coalitions should think more about how to affirm some forms of symbolic status compatible with rest of agenda.
.@TheoLandsman rightly raises concern that it’s ”Hard to know in the moment which symbols are benign and which are culturally toxic.” The Olympics might offer one example of a form of reasonably benign nationalism that can unify without dangerous spillovers.
Read 6 tweets
25 Jul
Bob Moses helped inspire my father to travel from Los Angeles to Mississippi to fight for voting rights. Moses also helped train a generation of activists on how to use bottom-up, strategic civil disobedience to fight for human rights. My dad just texted me: ”A great man.” RIP.
In 1964, Bob Moses was a ”shy, bespectacled math teacher” who guided Freedom Summer, ”busing hundreds of college students into backwoods Mississippi to register black voters. ‘The purpose,’ Moses says, ’was to break open Mississippi as a closed society.‘”…
In early 1990s I met Bob Moses through The Algebra Project.

Moses said, ”The question we asked then was: What are the skills people have to master to open the doors to citizenship? Now math literacy holds the key.”

That work helped inspire how I teach.…
Read 11 tweets
22 Jul
“Kelli Dillon was sterilized without her knowledge in a California prison in *2001*.”…
”In the early-to-mid 1900s, California forcibly sterilized tens of thousands of women and men as part of a eugenics program. The state banned forced sterilizations in 1979 but, between 2006 & 2010, still sterilized ~150 incarcerated women without required state approvals.”
”Kelli Dillon was 24 years old when she underwent an abdominal surgery and a simple procedure to address some possible cysts. Afterwards, she began to experience many strange symptoms which she finally learned were symptoms of menopause…”…
Read 6 tweets
20 Jul
California developer planned 18 new homes for low-income families. Original build cost specced at $414K per apt. However, ”political, economic and bureaucratic forces converged.” Project shrunk in size by nearly half and build cost swelled to 1.1M per apt.…
”California has the nation’s highest poverty rate when housing and other living expenses are factored in. Rising rents and skyrocketing home prices are a growing threat to the state, widening income equality and eroding economic mobility.”…
”California poverty rates are due to high rent costs. Under rule that rent shouldn’t exceed 30% of income, KPCC reports minimum wage workers should pay ~$546 in rent. Yet, a two-bedroom apartment in the most populated areas of CA costs more than $1,500.”…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!