Look who is now giving legal counsel to the Israeli spyware firm NSO Group.
Background: WhatsApp is suing NSO Group. There's an active motion in the court to dismiss NSO Groups lawyer team (King & Spalding) because they previously rep'd WhatsApp in a sealed motion years ago.
WhatsApp is arguing that its a conflict of interest for King & Spalding to represent NSO Group now considering they represented WhatsApp in the past. The judge is considering many declarations in support and opposition of this argument. This is where Rosenstein's filing comes in.
It gets crazier. Who represented WhatsApp in that sealed case from 2015-2016? Christopher Wray. Rosenstein in his filing swore under oath that he never discussed the unknown case with Wray.
Wray - Current FBI Director, represented WhatsApp in a sealed and ongoing matter.
Michael Dreeben - Former Mueller prosecutor, appeared once on behalf of WhatsApp.
Rosenstein - Former Deputy Attorney General, giving legal counsel to NSO Group against WhatsApp.
Hostile takeover + selective leaking + emotionally charged rhetoric with little substance. It’s the same, boring playbook. #twitterfiles
Musk and the people with whom he’s surrounded himself are copy-pasting the faux rage machine (see: WikiLeaks, the laptop, masks, etc etc etc etc)
This isn’t an adult discussion about the limitations of online speech. It’s just clickbait for the dying platform.
Make conservatives think it’s an existential crisis to the world, make liberals rage quote tweet = Engagement. It’s such an easy formula for bad actors. It’s tired.
I know people are tired of "collusion" talk, but it doesn't mean that this isn't a huge five-alarm fire still.
Trump received millions (I've heard 8 figures) from Saudi to host the LIV Golf nonsense and now a big real estate deal. He's running for President tomorrow.
All the while, Trump had top secret code word documents in his office at his house.
Operative questions I've yet to see asked of either the Trump or Saudi sides: When and where did the LIV Golf negotiations take place?
Democrats lead in 214 House races. They have to take the lead and win 4 of these for the majority.
CA13, AZ6 look plausible. Maybe CA41? Maybe OR5?
CA22 isn't out of the question either. I think the Democrats best chance is to sweep CA13, CA41, and CA22 and pick up maybe the AZ6 seat or a Boebert recount?
The House is going to be at MOST a 7-seat lead for the GOP. If *everything* goes right for the Democrats, they could hold the House with 219 seats.
Imagine a 218-217 House... It's going to be a long 2 years.