The President of the United States needs her permission to stand outside the “the Church of the Presidents” (est. 1816)?
Did this (liberal) bishop issue a similarly angry, political rant condemning the rioters, looters, seditionists & other violent felons who torched the church?
Did this (liberal) bishop issue a similarly angry, political rant condemning the rioters, looters, seditionists & other violent felons who torched the church?
She says that the President “sanctioned the use of tear gas by police officers in riot gear to clear the church yard.”
LaFayette Square, Pennsylvania Avenue, and the perimeter of the @WhiteHouse isn’t the “church yard.”
LaFayette Square, Pennsylvania Avenue, and the perimeter of the @WhiteHouse isn’t the “church yard.”
And it’s shameful of her to frame in this way the actions of dedicated men & women of the @SecretService and other federal law enforcement who are protecting the President of the United States from rioters, looters, seditionists & other violent felons during a tense situation.
This appears to be Bishop @Mebudde’s only response to the torching of @StJohnLafayette by rioters, looters, seditionists, and other violent felons:
She dismisses “the Church of the Presidents” (est. 1816) as “[a] building that can be rebuilt.”
She dismisses “the Church of the Presidents” (est. 1816) as “[a] building that can be rebuilt.”
Here’s Bishop @Mebudde’s leftwing political rant on @CNN tonight:
amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/06/01…
She expressed outrage that the President stood on the *publc sidewalk* in front of the “ALL ARE WELCOME” sign of the Church of the Presidents—but not the terrorists who torched it.
amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/06/01…
She expressed outrage that the President stood on the *publc sidewalk* in front of the “ALL ARE WELCOME” sign of the Church of the Presidents—but not the terrorists who torched it.
