Let's get this straight.

Senate Democrat leader Chuck Schumer went to the steps of the Supreme Court and physically threatened the justices, if they didn't rule his way on a pending case.

For months, Biden Democrats threatened and intimidated Supreme Court justices and their families in their homes.

With that same pending case.

The Biden White House and Justice Department encouraged these illegal obstruction-of-justice campaigns, falsely stating they were protected by the First Amendment. (They are absolutely not. They are a federal crime.)

Even after justices and their families went to safe houses.

Even after the 1 am assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh, his wife Ashley, and their two teenage daughters.

Biden Democrats constantly attack Ginni Thomas for her lifelong political advocacy--in which she has engaged long before her husband became a judge or justice.

But Trump is somehow "threatening" by pointing out the clear political biases of Democrat judges, prosecutors, attorneys, their staffs, their adult family members, and witnesses?

If anyone on the planet has the absolute constitutional right to do this, it is a criminal defendant.

Especially one going through a criminal process that is so obviously politicized and weaponized against him.

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1773517171106222227

Absent a compelling reason, it is shameful for Members of Congress to resign.

Their constituents lose their representative--for months.

These Members violate their promises and oaths:

"I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter." And Mike Gallagher (@RepGallagher/@MikeforWI) timed his resignation so his Wisconsin constituents will not have a House representative for nearly 10 months.

Truly a disgrace.

"Gallagher’s decision to leave April 19 also means that there will not be a special election to fill his seat. Under Wisconsin state law, vacancies after the second Tuesday in April are filled in the general election, so Gallagher’s replacement will be decided in November and his seat will remain empty until January."

nbcnews.com/politics/congr…

Federal judges must release January 6th protesters wrongfully convicted under the Biden DOJ’s politicized, bogus use of a federal criminal statute never intended to get weaponized against political opponents.

Trump 47 DOJ must hold accountable responsible Biden DOJ officials.

https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1762592465721172463

And every federal judge—partisan Democrat and cowardly Republican—who went along this:

You are a disgrace.

To the Constitution.

You ruined the lives of so many families.

You do not have the judgment to serve.

You should resign.

But you will not.

Because you are a disgrace.

Today's decision by the Democrat-controlled DC Circuit Court of Appeals is as predictable as it is wrong.

Members of Congress are immune, both civilly and criminally, for their officials acts.

So are federal judges.

Why wouldn't the President of the United States--any President?

Four DC federal judges did not even establish at a baseline level that the President of the United States cannot be thrown in prison by his successor based upon his official acts.

They ignored the Constitution's separation of powers.

Thus, the Supreme Court must take and decide this case.

This case is much bigger than Trump.

This precedent is very dangerous and highly destructive to the presidency--thus, our Constitution and country.

This means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Obama--along with his aides like U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, Obama's legal advisor at the time--for capital murder for their extrajudicial drone-striking of American citizens (including a minor).

This also means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Biden for his illegal release of dangerous migrants into the United States and the natural and probable crimes they commit.

Will the Supreme Court do its job?

Or allow these Republic-ending tactics?

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… The DC Circuit creates a special rule for Trump.

(So they can ignore their ruling to protect Obama and Biden.)

If the Supreme Court wants the federal judiciary to keep any legitimacy with half of the American people, it must do its job and fix this dangerously wrong ruling.

Dear @JoyAnnReid:

Iowa has always been a leader on civil rights.

We’ve always been a free state.

The Iowa Supreme Court protected out-of-state slaves in 1839.

We desegregated our schools in 1868.

And allowed Black men to vote that same year.

We allowed women to vote in 1920.

And we’ve been a refugee resettlement state for 50 years.

Iowa is a very welcoming place.

For you to pretend Iowa is a racist state proves you’re shamefully and disgustingly dishonest with your viewers.

But your anti-white, anti-Christian bigotry makes your deranged leftwing @MSNBC viewers very happy. Let me be more blunt:

@JoyAnnReid doesn’t care if poor Black kids are trapped in failed government schools.

She doesn’t care about rampant Black-on-Black murders and other violent crime.

She just wants to make a bunch of money off of deranged white liberals who watch @MSNBC.

ICYMI from @joshgerstein in @Politico on November 13, 2021:

FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

politi.co/3FesP3G "The Biden administration’s effort to establish itself as a committed champion of press freedom is facing new doubts because of the Justice Department’s aggressive legal tactics against a conservative provocateur known for his hidden-camera video stings."

politico.com/news/2021/11/1…

ICYMI from @JamesRosenTV in @NYTimes on December 30, 2016:

"Over the past eight years, the [Obama] administration has prosecuted nine cases involving whistle-blowers and leakers, compared with only three by all previous administrations combined."

nytimes.com/2016/12/30/opi… The Obama Administration "has repeatedly used the Espionage Act, a relic of World War I-era red-baiting, not to prosecute spies but to go after government officials who talked to journalists."

nytimes.com/2016/12/30/opi…

Amen.

Advertiser boycotts are highly effective tactics leftists use to cow media executives to destroy free speech--and control the political narrative.

@MMFA is the driving force behind conservative media getting crushed--and conservative voices silenced.

Cheers to @ElonMusk.

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1729992193463521685

https://x.com/mrddmia/status/1649425066780762124?s=20

“Footage showed several women stripped of their clothing. One video showed a woman, her hands zip-tied behind her back, with blood on the crotch of her pants.” washingtonpost.com/world/2023/11/… “Later came testimony from witnesses and first responders. One witness described in graphic detail a gang rape at the Nova rave site near Re’im. An Israeli reserve combat paramedic told The Post that he found the bodies of teenage girls with signs of sexual assault.”

🚨

2 Obama judges and a Biden judge on the DC federal appellate court just put a temporary pause on Biden special counsel Jack Smith and DC Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan's blatantly unconstitutional gag order on Trump. Just to keep your expectations in line, this is merely a temporary tactical retreat by the Marxists:

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1720241871870390299?s=46&t=MIbsKW2CLMsk2bY3FjR-cA

The Democrats’ lawfare and election interference against Trump ramps up on a new front tomorrow.

This time, in Denver.

The Democrats impeached Trump twice.

For nonsense.

And indicted him four times.

For non-crimes.

They are trying to destroy his family business.

With a bogus civil “fraud” lawsuit.

For the non-fraud of a businessman paying back sophisticated Wall Street banks.

In full.

On time.

With interest.

As agreed.

The Democrats even illegally—and outrageously—gagged Trump.

Twice.

(A defendant—more than anyone—must have the constitutional right to criticize the prosecutor, judge, court staff, and process.

Especially when the charges are transparently political.)

But the Democrats’ lawfare and election interference backfired.

Trump’s going to beat Biden like a drum on November 5, 2024.

So now the Democrats want partisan Democrat judges and election officials to simply boot Trump from the ballot.

To take away Americans’ right to choose our President.

Under a bogus legal theory Trump is (somehow) disqualified from running under for office.

By a post-Civil War amendment to root out those who fought against the Union.

The Democrats have another bogus, partisan trial this week in Colorado.

In front of a partisan Democrat judge.

Who donated to the Democrats’ get-out-the-vote campaign.

Nothing screams “Democracy!” like indicting, bankrupting, silencing, imprisoning, and disqualifying your political opponents.

So @Article3Project will head to the Denver courthouse tomorrow.

To publicly support Trump.

Here’s our @WashTimes piece explaining the Democrats’ bogus legal theory to disqualify Trump from the ballot:

DAVIS: Democrats’ lawless game to remove Trump from 2024 ballot
Mike Davis | The Washington Times

After the Civil War, Congress passed and the states ratified the Civil War amendments. The 13th, 14th and 15th amendments outlawed slavery, guaranteed equal protection and due process to freed slaves, and guaranteed voting rights to freed male slaves.

In the immediate aftermath of the war, Confederate sympathizers began winning elections to the House of Representatives and other key offices. Fearing they would undermine the Union and Reconstruction efforts, Congress added Section 3 to what would become the 14th Amendment to disqualify Confederate sympathizers from holding office if they engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States during the Civil War.

Democrats, desperate to defeat a resurgent former President Donald Trump, are dusting off the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause, largely dormant for 155 years, with a ridiculous legal theory to remove him from the ballot before the 2024 presidential election.

Fearing their two impeachments, four bogus indictments and several frivolous civil cases — blatant lawfare and election interference by Democrats — will not stop Mr. Trump on Nov. 5, 2024, Democrats and some Trump-deranged Republicans are pushing their legal theory that Mr. Trump is disqualified from running for office under the disqualification clause (Section 3) of the post-Civil War 14th Amendment.

Their theory is that Mr. Trump’s challenge to the 2020 election (which he was allowed to do under the Electoral Count Act of 1887 and the First Amendment), the Jan. 6 protest (which was permitted by the National Park Service and allowed by the First Amendment), and the resulting riot (of which House Democrats’ Jan. 6 committee found no evidence of Mr. Trump’s incitement) was an “insurrection.”

Thus, Democrats pretend Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies Mr. Trump from running for president in 2024.

In other words, because Democrats fear the American people will vote Mr. Trump back into the White House, they want to take away the voters’ choice. This starts with left-wing watchdog groups such as Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington engaging in frivolous litigation in a blue state to set a lawless and dangerous precedent.

Their next targets will be key swing states like Michigan or Georgia. Further, we should prepare for unilateral declarations of disqualification by politicians, even without a criminal conviction or other judicial process.

For people who proclaim they are defending democracy, this is one of the most dangerous, destructive and anti-democratic political games imaginable.

Even if Mr. Trump has the support of the public to win back the White House, these disqualification clause zealots simply want President Biden to win by default.

This will not fly with the American people, and it will not fly with the Supreme Court.

Indeed, Stanford law professor Michael McConnell — a former federal appellate judge and no fan of Mr. Trump — destroys this legal fantasy that politicians can disqualify Mr. Trump from running for office based on the events of Jan. 6.

There is no evidence of an insurrection or rebellion on Jan. 6 under the 14th Amendment’s Civil War meaning.

“These are demanding terms, connoting only the most serious of uprisings against the government, such as the Whisky Rebellion and the Civil War,” Judge McConnell wrote.

Labeling Jan. 6 an insurrection rather than a riot is a dangerous political game that will lead to lawless, political, and very destructive disqualifications of political opponents going forward.

“The terms of Section 3 should not be defined down to include mere riots or civil disturbances, which are common in United States history,” Judge McConnell concluded.

Section 3 is also not self-executing. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives Congress — not partisan state officials — the power to determine what qualifies as insurrection or rebellion.

ICYMI:

BLM riots = good; January 6th riot = bad

“U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan called it a false equivalence ‘to compare the actions of people protesting, mostly peacefully, for civil rights’ to the mob that ‘was trying to overthrow the government.’” apnews.com/article/black-… BLM leaders:

1. Self-proclaimed “trained Marxists”

2. Idolize dictator (Mao) who mass-murdered 45 million Asians

3. Advocate political violence (domestic terrorism)

4. Support terrorists (Hamas) attacking civilians of key ally (Israel)

5. Raise money to bail out child… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Fact Check: 💯 True.

Trump’s flawless Gorsuch nomination and confirmation united weak and wobbly Senate Republicans to run over the Democrats’ filibuster and lower the vote threshold from 60 to 51.

This comforted Kennedy enough to retire, so Trump could replace Kennedy with his… https://t.co/wMF65a5yEVtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

https://twitter.com/manishpamwar/status/1674909776008945671

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1674943600164241409

Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Biden Justice Department put Democrat political operatives on Trump cases.

Here's just one example.

Sophia Brill worked on Biden's unprecedented raid on Trump.

Now, Sophia Brill is working in the Biden White House.

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1570961258891079680

Another example is Matthew Colangelo, a top Biden Justice Department political appointee:

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1642599699713757184?s=20

The Biden Justice Department reached a sweetheart deal with Hunter Biden.

Hunter will get no jail time for being the bagman for Joe Biden’s vast foreign corruption.

The Biden Justice Department will continue to bury evidence the President of the United States is compromised. Silver Lining:

Hunter Biden can no longer plead the Fifth.

House Republicans should issue subpoenas immediately for his documents and testimony.

John Durham, former Connecticut U.S. Attorney, was handpicked by both Democrat home-state senators.

Same with David Weiss, current Delaware U.S. Attorney.

Why did Biden keep Weiss?

Both have protected Biden for years.

Rob Hur, former Maryland U.S. Attorney, will do same.

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1670916994789687297

Bill Barr, who clearly hates Trump, picked Durham and Weiss.

Merrick Garland, who clearly hates Trump, picked Hur.

The Uniparty protects its own.

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1670788683723862016?s=46&t=MIbsKW2CLMsk2bY3FjR-cA

ICYMI:

FBI has hidden evidence since 2017 then-VP Biden and Hunter got caught on 17 audio tapes taking a $10 million foreign bribe and changing U.S. policy.

Biden apparently didn’t realize he walked into a blackmail trap with a likely Russian asset.

President is compromised. grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/g…

Trump's most consequential accomplishment of his 1st term was his transformation of the 5-4 John Roberts Court to the 5-4 Clarence Thomas Court.

Trump delivered the 1st constitutionalist majority in 90 years.

Strange attack.

(And I'm a DeSantis fan, while supporting Trump.)

https://twitter.com/NvrBackDown24/status/1668304459431297026

Wonder what changed?

https://twitter.com/govrondesantis/status/1310291720081473536

Biden discussing Trump on November 9, 2022: whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

Because those are his presidential records.

He received them as the President.

He's allowed to have them under the Presidential Records Act.

Classified or not.

Congress can amend the PRA, if it doesn't want former presidents to have their presidential records.

https://twitter.com/JamesSurowiecki/status/1667660176252452865

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1574517123380310016

Hillary caught with illegal home server

With most classified secrets

Clinton Foundation foreign corruption

Destroyed evidence

Real espionage

Real obstruction

What did Obama, Biden, Hillary, AG, FBI, CIA do?

Deflect

Bogus/illegal Crossfire Hurricane investigation

On Trump

https://twitter.com/alx/status/1667258202851889160

On 1/19/2021, Trump declassified (via memo) and took personal copy of damning Crossfire Hurricane presidential records.

In secure Office of Former President.

Allowed by Presidential Records Act.

He sued Hillary.

Before records went public, Biden ordered illegal raid on Trump.