The following is my husband Tim's account of witnessing the police shooting of Oscar Grant on 1/1/2009. #BlackLivesMatter
The weirdest thing about it was how unsurprising the actual shooting was when it happened. That's how far the police had already escalated things by then. /1
My family and I were on our way back from a New Year's concert in San Francisco when the train stopped, then we heard cops screaming and cursing. One came into our car, shoved past passengers and grabbed a young black guy who'd come in from another car, screaming and cursing. /2
The guy (not Oscar) provided no resistance, but the cop was extremely rough with him, dragged him out of the train and shoved him hard against the wall. Other cops were doing the same thing roughly dragging other young black men off the train, absolutely RAGING the whole time. /3
One of the young men was being restrained by multiple cops, with the most aggressive cop on the scene using the same knee-on-neck position that killed George Floyd. I later learned that man's name was Oscar Grant. /4
The atmosphere was so full of rage at that point that I was already thinking "please nobody take out a gun". When I saw a cop draw his gun I thought "please don't-".
Then he did. It was not surprising. The cops had escalated things so far by then. Someone was going to die. /5
I was in the window closest to the shooting. Oscar was not resisting at all. The cop later said he'd meant to tase him (bullshit), but there was no reason to tase him. The only ones displaying aggression were the cops.
People took videos. Cops tried to confiscate their phones. /6
The train left before we could find out what happened. There was a girl crying. Her significant other, a white guy, was loudly saying in this overbearing, dismissive tone that the man hadn't been shot. He said it was just a taser. /7
I lived in Fremont, which was the final stop. When everyone got off, the white people went one way, and the black people went another way. No words exchanged between the two groups. We all knew what we'd just witnessed. Whether we admitted it or not, we knew. /8
I went online the next day to find out what happened, and when I described what I'd seen on discussion forums about the story I was mobbed by people telling me I was a liar, that Oscar was a thug and the cop was just defending himself. As a white guy it was very educational. /9
I've seen claims that police brutality and racism are being blown out of proportion by the media, but anyone who's witnessed it up close knows this is bullshit. If you don't believe this urgently needs fixing it's because you've been lucky enough not to have experienced it. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Media's Odd Double Standard On Evidence Required For Claims Of An Impending Attack
When claims begin emerging of an imminent attack by a US ally, the media suddenly remember their journalistic training to note that these claims are "without evidence". caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-medias-o…
I've highlighted a key repeating phrase we've been seeing in a few quotes to help you spot the difference between the way the western media cover unevidenced claims about a future attack by Moscow and unevidenced claims about a future attack by Kyiv:
See if you can spot the difference between the above examples and the way CBS News reports an anonymous government official's claim that Putin has ordered the invasion of Ukraine to proceed:
Replies have highlighted the fact that this recording is in fact the calling song of the Indies short-tailed cricket, which was established as the origin of the "Havana Syndrome" noise in *2019*. Listen for yourself; it's an exact match: orthsoc.org/sina/492a.htm
This is not some fringe esoteric information. It was reported in The New York Times. Anyone doing a basic Google search on this story while preparing this 60 Minutes special would have encountered it. nytimes.com/2019/01/04/sci…
NYT suddenly remembers to put this disclaimer on unproven claims about an imminent large-scale attack.
This is happening throughout all MSM; claims made about an attack by Ukraine are made "without evidence", but when evidence-free claims are made about an attack by Russia it's just "government sources say" and "based on intelligence". theguardian.com/world/2022/feb…
It's not that the US elects incompetent leaders who make bad decisions that kill millions of people with warfare, it's that the global US empire is held together with military violence and the threat thereof. It's an intrinsically evil institution and you should always oppose it.
It's not that the US government has *done evil*, it's that the US government *is itself evil*. The very way it has set itself up to operate in the world necessarily means it must exert endless violence and oppression to keep populations functioning in its interests. That's evil.
The Mafia hasn't happened to make bad decisions throughout its history that resulted in the unfortunate demise of certain individuals, it's an institution explicitly set up to reap profits by exerting and threatening violent force. The US empire is exactly the same. Same evil.
Anyone who talks about the Ukraine crisis like it's just Putin being evil while ignoring the actions of the US and NATO which got us here is a disinformation agent.
This is really and truly as deep as most western analysis of this situation goes:
It should really be common sense by now that when the entire western political/media class starts screaming that a government is acting like an evil supervillain you're probably being propagandized. But most people are swallowing it hook, line and sinker. fair.org/home/what-you-…
The onus is not on anyone else to prove that US claims about Russian operations are false, the onus is on the US to prove that they are true. The burden of proof doesn't magically disappear just because some pundits and politicians said something in an assertive tone.