This whole thing works out great for Cotton, who wrote that op-ed for an audience of one. Someone who'll shower him with extra love and maybe even SecDef post. Great job, @nytopinion, way to get played. 
Cotton wrote that op-ed because he's a fascist, but he's also a **deeply** ambitious one. Is it the @nytopinion's job to steady his ladder?
I do not understand what this can mean. It was an op-ed by a sitting Senator that should have made handle with care (ie: reject) warning bells go off. Certainly, make sure you alert the boss warning bells.
And...who wrote the headline?
And...who wrote the headline?
Cotton is playing the Times like a fiddle
Get
A
Public
Editor
Now
A
Public
Editor
Now
no words. nytimes.com/2020/06/04/bus…
Christ they still think the newsroom/opinion confusion is the issue nytimes.com/2020/06/04/bus…
In fact my main take away from this piece (aside from Bennet/deputies not reading op-ed) are that the newsroom—by assigning three reporters—is mainly interested in displaying the difference btw news and opinion side of the Times.
NOT THE MAIN POINT
NOT THE MAIN POINT
no words thedailybeast.com/new-york-times…
