Democrats are making a mockery of our elections in CA.
First, Gov. Newsom signed an executive order to send mail-in ballots to “all voters,” regardless if they are inactive (and likely died or moved away).
CA doesn’t even know how many inactive voters are on its rolls. (1/6)
On Tuesday, Democrats made their intentions clear by voting against an amendment in the state senate that would have prohibited ballots from going to the “huge but unknown number of inactive voters who might not even exist.” (2/6) sfchronicle.com/politics/artic…
What’s worse, the bill Democrats are advancing now would allow mail-in ballots to be returned by ballot harvesters and counted for at least *20 days* after Election Day.
Seriously. (3/6)
On Wednesday, Gov. Newsom tried again.
Less than a month after declaring anything less than an all-mail election a “threat” to public health, now the Democrat signed an executive order to increase the availability of in-person voting.
I’m confused. Which is it? (4/6)
This is what the Democrats attempted in #CA25, adding a polling station in a Democrat area at the last minute after mail-in returns weren’t going their way.
But as we saw, no amount of rigging by the Democrats can stop GOP enthusiasm! (5/6)
Every single month – for 7 months in a row – Google has systematically attacked the RNC’s email fundraising during important donation days at the end of the month.
Our emails go from strong inbox delivery (90-100%) down to 0%. (1/4)
These are emails that go to our most engaged, opt-in supporters without any increase in user complaints, changes to the content, email frequency or target audiences that could account for the suppression. (2/4)
Yet month after month – like clockwork – right ahead of a CRITICAL period when voters are most engaged, Google blocks our emails. They even block GOTV emails. (3/4)
Democrats are peddling a false narrative about Georgia’s election bill, which actually EXPANDS voting opportunities.
Here are the facts:
(1/6)
This bill increases the number of early voting days and hours overall, and in addition to making it easier to vote, the legislation includes a number of reforms that will increase transparency and improve the voting experience for all Georgia voters. (2/6)
It provides for reasonable voter ID requirements for absentee ballots. Voters can provide their Driver’s License number, last four digits of their SSN, or a copy of an acceptable form of identification.
Is anyone surprised that Gretchen Whitmer is trying to cover up her nursing home scandal?
She doesn’t want the public to know the truth about her policies that killed thousands of Michiganders.
Here’s what we know: (1/4)
Over 5,523 Michiganders in long-term care facilities have died from COVID-19, which is 1 in 3 deaths in Michigan.
We don’t have accurate nursing home data from Whitmer’s office, and Michiganders are suing to get the facts.
Reporting errors have gone unresolved. (2/4)
When President Trump’s DOJ began demanding answers from Whitmer on nursing homes last year, she issued a joint statement with Andrew Cuomo calling it a “transparent politicization.” (3/4) bridgemi.com/michigan-gover…
Joe Biden and his team have repeatedly shown they hate being asked about evidence of Biden family corruption.
Friday night, Biden insulted a CBS reporter. (1/4)
Yesterday, after being grilled by reporters on his favorite milkshake flavor, Biden hurried away from reporters after being asked about the FBI seizing his son Hunter’s laptop. (2/4)
Reminder: Joe Biden and his team have NOT denied that the emails are real.
A Biden surrogate said: "I don't think anybody is saying they are inauthentic" (3/4)
Since the media has let Joe Biden get away with being the least scrutinized presidential candidate in history, here are a few questions ABC should demand answers to:
1) After 47 years in D.C., why should Americans trust you to fix problems you’ve never been able to solve?
2) Why won’t you give a firm answer about whether you want to transform the third branch of government and pack the Supreme Court?
3) Do you support Big Tech companies censoring stories from reputable news outlets when they publish unflattering information about a politician?