Q has unintentionally started an argument among the Anons tonight by claiming that the Obama Foundation posted a picture of a George Floyd protest a week before Floyd was murdered.
Either because Q doesn't understand how default images work, or because Q knows Anons don't.
Either because Q doesn't understand how default images work, or because Q knows Anons don't.
So we have Anons who understand technology on one side, and Anons who think it's some sort of dark magic on the other.
According to Q's total lack of understanding of how websites can interact with Twitter, I guess this has been in the works since last October?
Funny that for 8 months, nobody was like, "hey who's that a picture of?"
Funny that for 8 months, nobody was like, "hey who's that a picture of?"
Again, this is another crazily unforced error by the Q Team, a super-secret agent showing their followers they do not understand web technology one bit
(also, if we choose to believe Q, we must also acknowledge they didn't notice this in the works for... a YEAR)
(also, if we choose to believe Q, we must also acknowledge they didn't notice this in the works for... a YEAR)
This would be really embarrassing for a lot of prominent QAnon influencers, if only they could feel embarrassment
Okay, Q is walking it back by saying...
...actually I'm not sure what Q is saying?
...actually I'm not sure what Q is saying?
Hey I need an assist by someone who knows more about this than me. @prag_com? @HW_BEAT_THAT?
To me, this is technobabble, but I assume Ron is swooping in to help out Jim. What *is* this?
To me, this is technobabble, but I assume Ron is swooping in to help out Jim. What *is* this?
It would appear that Q's hail Mary pass is good enough for some Anons
This is all high quality stuff
UPDATE: three years. Probably the whole reason Q started posting about an entirely different subject and never once mentioned it
PLEASE, GO ON
it's gold
it's all gold
it's all gold
The big guns are drawing lines in the sand now, ready to defend Q's second ridiculous screw-up in a week
A new theory emerges and smarter Anons immediately shoot a bunch of holes in it
If anyone wants or needs a summary of what all this is about, I summarized everything that went down
This is literally the *entire* summary Medic gives of what happened yesterday. He then spends NINETEEN tweets examining the "not for anons" follow-up Drop, mostly by citing examples of times Q started a Drop by specifically saying it was for someone else.
After 23 tweets, Medic changes course and decides to address the actual event
Thanks for reading Medic, remember to like and subscribe
Thanks for reading Medic, remember to like and subscribe
Do you think Medic ever gets frustrated, seeing how dumb some Anons actually are
Except this random Anon's post DOESN'T ACTUALLY MAKE ANY SENSE because it's just rephrasing the thing we already know is wrong
