the world's so messed up rt now. a global movement righteously mobilises to demand the killing of innocent Black people stop & tragically needs to exclaim that Black Lives Matter. yet women who say that their sex based experience matters are being told, you don't matter enough.
among so many things this most recent tornado has told me is that as a "cis" man, i have no right to talk about the trans experience, but apparently i have every right to talk about the female experience. & i can do so in the most vicious & demeaning way & be applauded for it.
acquiescence is demanded as kindness, biological reality is equated with bigotry, critical thinking abandoned for subterfuge.
i re-read this piece as often as i re-read Garnette Cadogan's "Walking While Black" b/c it is an illuminating & educational expose of female sex based reality from adolescence to adulthood, yet the author Jessica Valenti seems to disagree with JKR.
but how many biological male's can say they've had this innate, generational experience that she eloquently describes? maybe elsewhere in her memoir she concedes some of her space for biological males, however they identify.
but i don't get how stating biological reality counts as a phobia, how kindness only works one way. maybe some women who follow me can opine on how that gels w/these powerful quotes that seem to reinforce some aspects that only seem to relate the female experience?
the facts of biological reality & sexual dimorphism aren't unkind. just as the support of women's equality on the basis of their sex-class isn't bigotry. women have been discriminated against for all of history based upon it, why shouldn't they be liberated based upon it as well?
Zionism is simple; the belief that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland. It’s a moot question answered over 80 years ago. Israel exists.
Anti-Zionism is NOT about criticising Israeli policies or military tactics, it’s not about excoriating Bibi as a criminal or
highlighting how a racist Otzma Yehudit party was brought into government. It’s about delegitimisation through demonisation, in order to eliminate, in one way or another, the only democratic state in the Middle East. The only state in the Middle East where Muslims enjoy full
Recently @JohnSimpsonNews wrote about when he went to cover the trial of Klaus Barbie, the Butcher of Lyon. He was interviewing a man Barbie had arrested and he asked ‘How did Barbie know about you?’ ‘My neighbour betrayed me.’ ‘What happened to him?’
‘He’s still my neighbour.’
50 years later, and the neighbour was still listening in from his garden and only ran inside when they turned the camera on him.
In the last week, I've been appalled to see just how many "neighbours" there are in Ireland, the UK, the US, Australia, France, Germany, and all across the West.
I still think about the large number of QTs on the @NWCI's thread about the dangers of prostitution from self described leftists railing against the demonisation of sex work. There were absolutely excoriating and severe in their denouncements of the NWCI and their abandonment
of the "true" feminist ideals; the ideals that "TWAW and Sex Work is Work," both an affirmation and catechism requiring a suspense of reality, and they were tarred with the bigot brush.
The NWCI, the same group who penned and signed a letter with @AmnestyIreland calling on the Media and Politicians to deny legitimate representation to those in Ireland-mostly women-with a belief in biology, and concerns and/or objections to the GRA and Self-Id.
The idea of diversity is negated when thoughts aren’t allowed to differ. Inclusion can never be achieved when societal discussions that should be broad in orientation & scope are replaced with those that are narrow. Inclusion does not mean open; it means involvement, engagement.
It's hard work because true inclusion requires the greatest effort to be as right for everyone as possible. It requires dialogue, examination, debate, fact, convincing. It requires the kindness that Conor so woefully and lazily misplaces here.
It also requires humanity. & I think humanity is less about having empathy for those with whom you agree, but rather having empathy for those with whom you disagree. It also requires a grounding in empathy and reality to realise that the kindest thing to possibly say is that:
They have no escape anymore; in sports, in school, in the spaces in life that they had to fight to carve out for themselves in order to give them places of safety, opportunity and confidence. They are constantly facing social pressures to conform to a hypersexualised
version of femininity in an abuse-porn addled age, where boys & Social Media are placing impossible expectations on them while telling them that they're not enough, or that they should be more. Or that their merit as a human being is determined by their compliance.
A great indicator of the moral or ethical veracity of an idea or movement is in how it deals with those who disagree. 🧵
Classic Liberalism cherishes diversity of thought. Differing voices are important in order to do the hard work of building a common world in which we can live together amidst our real and important differences. It values rationalism, reason and science. It seeks to uplift.
It is democratic and loving. Diversity of thought is Classic Liberalism's strength. Protest is peaceful, non violence is absolutely necessary, because true and lasting success lay in strength of ideas and in the power of words to effect change in order to improve the world.