Uriah Profile picture
Jun 10, 2020 59 tweets 13 min read Read on X
The title of tonight tweetstorm is “How are the Blacks like the Irish?”, but it’s really about how selection against schizophrenia has been a powerful influence on differences in personality and intelligence between human groups. @Steve_Sailer ,@DavidePiffer , @hbdchick
This figure shows the calculated polygenic risk score for schizophrenia among different populations. CEU (Mormons) and TSI (Tuscans) are lowest, YRI (Yoruba) and LWK (Luhya) the highest.
The author of the study believes the differences shown make polygenic risk assessment a bit absurd, as "The distributions of scores for African and European subjects hardly overlapped." biorxiv.org/content/biorxi…
I don’t believe it’s absurd. I think that what you’re ultimately seeing in that figure is a measurement is each population's disposition toward a dopamine mediated sensation seeking, a rough measure of extraversion and "interestingness".
Blacks are relaxed, fun, creative. All these traits contribute to their tendency to hit on anything nearby that looks even remotely like a woman. In evolutionary terms this is obviously adaptive; it requires no special explanation. What does is why everybody isn't like this
The answer is that such extreme sensation seeking is mediated by dopamine (Parkinson's patients taking big doses of l-dopa often become compulsive gamblers and sex addicts) and excessive dopaminergic transmission so easily degenerates into schizophrenia.
There are three dominant factors that determine schizophrenia prevalence around the world: latitude, fish consumption, and rural vs urban living. Blacks are "black" behaviorally because in their natural environment no one else had a stronger dose of all three protective factors.
This huge table is from a 1987 meta-analysis and it shows studied populations with the lowest ever record incidences of schiz. The Amish rank as the world’s least crazy people, but I have seen other papers which show an even lower rate in fish eating Polynesians.
And here is the Hall of Shame. The highest schiz rate ever recorded was from a community of settled Eskimo south of Hudson Bay. The highest European mark came from a community of Finns in far northern Sweden.
Latitude (not temperature) is the most powerful predictor of schiz because of its association with sunlight and vitamin D. New York is much colder than London, but it’s London that’s experiencing a schizophrenia catastrophe among its black population.
In the US schiz is about twice as common in urban as rural areas, but the Amish show that “rural” encompasses a lot. The strongest environmental protectants against schiz are exposure to farm animals and dogs during pregnancy. Cats increase risk:
I think all the risk factors also here apply to homosexuality, as I’ll talk about more about later: farm boys aren’t just pretending; they really are less gay than the rest of you. This set of risk factors also goes some way toward explaining very high homo rates in Jews.
Minorities have a higher risk of developing schizophrenia everywhere and a smaller minority they are in their city the greater their risk. Ethnic and cultural homogeneity reduces feeling of paranoia and distrust: the Amish do not see conspiracies everywhere.
The last important variable is fish consumption, mediated by the extraordinarily powerful anti-psychotic effects of EPA-DHA. There is no reason everyone on earth should not take fish oil, particularly high risk groups like West Africans in Britain.
Iceland is almost in the Arctic Circle and yet their schizophrenia prevalence is actually lower than the European average because they eat even more fish than the Japanese.
Finns have consistently the highest schizophrenia rates of any European people because they live so far north and yet, unlike the Scandinavians, they stupidly don't eat fish.
West Africans in their natural environment were heaven blessed to have all three protectants in the maximum dose: they live directly on the equator, malaria made urbanization impossible, and they eat gobs of fish. This map shows serum omega-3 levels around the world:
That’s the origin story of how they came to be this way but I’m going to transition now into to explaining how dopamine explains a cluster of physical and behavioral traits in blacks: explosive movement, thick and dry skin, and thick hair/eyebrows.
A quick word on dopamine: the positive symptoms of schizophrenia are treated by dopamine lowering anti-psychotics. Dopamine is often misunderstood as a pleasure neurotransmitter but it really mediates movement, specifically the will to move.
I read a paper by a doctor who prescribed anti-psychotics all the time and decided to try one himself at his university. He immediately lost the will to keep working, drove home and collapsed into an armchair for hours.
In the old days before L-DOPA, Parkinson’s patients were reduced to hobbled human statues, sitting alone all day doing nothing. There are however anecdotal reports of them all of a sudden springing into action to escape fires then immediately becoming immobile once out of danger
I have taken and am taking L-DOPA (I wouldn’t be writing these furious tweetstorms without it). The first weird thing that happened to me when I started was that I began to spontaneous tap my fingers, at first for no reason but then whenever I heard music.
I honestly didn’t know this, but finger tapping tests are the primary way to measure L-DOPA effectiveness in Parkinsonian’s patients. In addition to the tapping, my reflexes became faster and running all of a sudden became fun because I seemed to bounce off the pavement.
A lot of armchair racial theorists think that athletic differences between blacks and whites are due to T, but the literature there shows there either very little or no gap at all between races.
Blacks have longer arms and legs and lower body fat, which their climate allows. But the primary athletic advantage they enjoy is dopamine mediated burst speed.
Take a super athletic white guy, load him with unhealthy amounts of T and he will still never be able to move like this:
Even black women and children have a natural "bounce" that full grown white men lack.
Someday I’ll devote a tweetstorm to the totally unique Larry Bird, who shared Jordan’s megalomania, penchant for compulsive betting, and violently fast hands and feet. Bird was a paranoiac who spent his whole life fighting:
Blacks have an athletic advantage in almost in almost every big money sport, but the sports that most reward violent, schizophrenic bursts of speed are boxing and basketball.
The next thing I noticed in my Dopaquest was that about a week in my hair had become as thick as it was when was a teenager and then it kept getting even thicker. My eyebrows also became thick and conspicuously dark.
Again I really didn’t know this, but L-DOPA and dopamine powerfully enhance growth hormone secretion. It also stimulates ACTH, which darkens skin and hair. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Blacks have higher pulses of growth hormone than whites do and much of what makes their appearance distinctive is similar to changes seen in acromegaly: thick hair and dry skin, loud, deep voices, large hands.
This is an old, well established connection between schizophrenia risk and creativity :nature.com/articles/nn.40…
In all of 1835 Europe I would be surprised if there were 1,000 part black individuals integrated into society, but from this miniscule group emerged the 1/4th black Alexandre Dumas and the 1/8th Alexander Pushkin.
In whites who are psychotic, creative, or creatively psychotic there is a noticeably increased tendency to have extremely thick dark hair and thick eyebrows. I’ll now put on a slideshow of great creative crazies of this type:
Jim Jones hair was so thick and dark that as a child his mother called him "my little Indian"
This is Syd Barrett, one of a huge number of actually schizophrenic musicians to have the "George Harrison look"
Another being Peter Green
America's most creatively accomplished/mentally ill president also had ludicrously thick, jet black hair and eyebrows.
No comment needed:
Outside of Africa, the place where this physical type is seen at the greatest frequency is among sun baked Indians, who in their natural environments enjoy very low schizophrenia rates.
The distinctive Indian pattern of extremely fast, extremely quarrelsome speech likely results from a combination of African like dopaminergic tone while possessing a normal or even superior group IQ.
Among Europeans specifically there are several populations that display unusually thick hair, thick eye brows, reputations for fast anger and an aptitude for music, dancing, and boxing. You particularly see this type in the fish eating Spanish, south Italians and Cretans.
But the group that stands apart from their close neighbors in all these ways the most starkly are the Irish. However, they’re very different from the all populations mentioned so far: way up north, little sunlight, not much fish consumption now or in the past.
The primary clue to uncovering what’s happened is that the Irish represent a European extreme in two other ways: unexposed skin that is lighter than any European people, even Scandinavians, and a continent high frequency of hemochromatosis (iron overload).
Both of these distinctive features act to preserve bone health under conditions of very high rainfall and little sunlight. Those with light skin are able to produce more Vitamin D after exposure to sunlight than the competition: researchgate.net/profile/Etienn…
The European locale that most closely resembles Ireland on maps of rainfall and sunlight is Iceland, which more extreme in both dimensions. Icelanders have also been found to possess abnormally high iron stores: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
I think Ireland and Iceland, both rain soaked and sunless, may be the only two places on earth where alcoholism was selected for because consumption linearly increases ferritin stores in blood. An old farmer may have found it easier to get a hold of booze than animal protein.
Icelanders don’t have problem drinking rates higher than other Europeans, but this is confounded by the fact that they enforced prohibition until NINETEEN EIGHTY-NINE. I don’t think they were just being sticklers: there is something funny going on here.
But circling back to the main point: In Coon’s The Races of Europe I believe the Irish are the only group singled out for the thickness of their bones and part of the mechanism has probably been a ruthless selection for both light skin and high baseline levels of Vitamin D.
D helps protect Irishmen against rickets and inflammatory diseases, but an expected benefit of the selection was this it provided them with a stronger immunity to schizophrenia than any other North European people. Psychotism is a plus if your body can handle it and they could.
An indicator of how ruthless selection was for skin color specifically can be seen in the contrast between extremely light Irish skin, moderately light eyes, and their surprisingly dark hair. Black Irish hair color may also have a different cause, mediated by dopamine>ACTH.
One manifestation of excessively high glucocorticoids like ACTH is Cushing’s Syndrome, whose symptoms are described by Wikipedia in the following way:
So are there populations that have gone the other way: where selection against schiz has taken place? You would expect it to happen in urbanized places of the far north and there is some evidence in the clump of low hanging dots in the CEU sample here.
About ¼ of Mormons have Scandinavian surnames, principally Danish and Norwegian, and I think the low hanging cluster of dots on the bottom of CEU represents individuals of majority Scandinavian descent that I know to exist in the dataset.
Scandinavians are under strong selective pressure to keep schizophrenia low, but their high consumption of fish both reduces the power of that pressure and redirects it away from acting directly upon schiz causing alleles and instead improving omega-3 metabolism instead.
The population that has probably been under the most ruthless selection again schiz per se are the Finns, who along with their Estonian cousins have the highest PISA scores in Europe. Pfiffer also calculated them as having highest the Edu Attainment PGS of any Europeans.
Schizophrenia risk increases with every IQ dropped and the same genes that increase schiz risk also impair mental function in normals: nature.com/articles/s4138…
Selection against nuttiness may also help to explain the distinctive Nordic personality: in other words, why they’re so boring. The positives to being sane are obvious; the downsides are that you find yourself living in a country where people stare at a burning log on Christmas.
There's a lot more to write about this, but these are the big points. In my next dealie I'm going to try to figure out what changed around 1985 that led to the current autism explosion and explain how it affected even non-autistic millenials.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Uriah

Uriah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crimkadid

Sep 2
Teenagers across northwest Europe were once expected to leave home and work as wandering laborers until settling down to marry in their 20s. This custom is much older than most think: the Germanic retinue of Tacitus, the warband, is a creation of these same life-cycle servants. Image
The Venetian ambassador Trevisano, visiting England in 1498, reported to his Italian readers that the English do not love their own children and so force them out of the house at tender ages, never to return. In exchange they take in unrelated children, who they then exploit. Image
The ambassador misunderstands two things. First, this practice was common across Northwest Europe, not just England. Second, the typical age children left at was 14, not seven. Perhaps ~50% of people served at some point: think of it as the traditional Northwest rite of passage. Image
Read 70 tweets
Jan 23
Christianity has historically helped to spread monogamy, exogamy, and consensual marriage around the world. None of these practices, though, originate in the Bible. They are all European traits which have piggybacked on to the Catholic Church. Where, exactly, do they come from? Image
In 1539 Philip of Hesse wrote to Martin Luther, asking him if bigamy was Biblically permissible. His first wife was ugly, smelly and drunk but these were then not grounds for divorce. Luther wrote back, admitting that "God not condemn polygamy.. but even seemed to countenance it”
Image
Image
Luther was not misinterpreting the Old Testament. Abraham, Jacob, Saul, David, and Solomon all married polygamously. The Bible only regulates the practice: a man cannot neglect his first wife, marry her sister, or prioritize children of his favorite wife in his inheritance.
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Jan 16
In 18th century England young men and women had complete freedom to select their spouses. This distinguished England not only from India or China but France and Germany. Where did this freedom come from and what are its consequences? A thread on "Marriage and Love in England": Image
To start, a love story. John Paston was a 15th century aristocrat. While John is away from home, his 20 year old daughter Margery pledges herself to his bailiff, Richard Calle. The family is outraged: her brother writes she will end up selling candles on the street. Image
Despite the family’s opposition (and wealth) Calle is confident he and Margery will win out. The law is on their side because Margery had formally betrothed herself to him and in England this means they are already married. The case is taken before the Bishop of Norfolk. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jan 8
Those who attempt to understand the Industrial Revolution often travel down a dead end. Every old economy is mostly agrarian, so European agriculture must have been unusually good, right? But European grain yields were actually awful and they somehow succeeded in spite of them. Image
Take this standard account from Robert Allen. It notes that on the eve of the Industrial Revolution English grain yields were good by the standards of northwest Europe, which itself “reaped yields twice those in most other parts of the world”. This is misleading in the extreme. Image
While Napoleon’s armies were in Egypt they surveyed the country's agriculture and discovered that it was more than twice as productive per land unit as in France. What's more surprising is that, when irrigated, the land yielded more even than in industrial age England. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 2
Why do the Somali have such thin bodies and large foreheads? This physical type is often explained as an adaptation to desert heat, but occurs in no other desert population outside Africa. The real culprit is milk anemia, a disease common in pastoralists and, once, in Europeans. Image
There are other African peoples, all pastoralists, that share many aspects of the Somali “look”. The type goes by many names: Hamitic, Cushitic, Ethiopid. Because they are often tall, the Belgian anthropologist Jean Hiernaux categorized them as “Elongated African". Image
The “F”s on Hiernaux’s map stand for Fulani, another pastoralist people. The Fulani have a striking physical resemblance to East African herders; many I think, could pass as Somali. There is though no close genetic link between them, something Hiernaux guessed 60 years ago. Image
Read 39 tweets
Jan 19, 2023
I grew up in rural Minnesota, about the least English part of the US. When my family went on vacations to "Real America" it dawned on me that we were not yet fully assimilated. We were Minnesota nice, but the Old Americans had something we didn't: they were "gentlemanly".
On vacation, my family went out to a Arizona VFW to celebrate my sister's 10th birthday. As he was leaving this long faced cowboy looking man congratulated her and casually handed her a 20. I was amazed at that. Minnesotans are _very_ nice, but they don't do things like that.
I tried to understand: why don't Minnesota Germans and Norwegians ever act like that? Maybe because it would be seen as invasion of privacy, but that's only a rationalization. Germanics don't do it because they're stiff: they prefer straightforward, stereotyped politeness.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(