This has bothered me for a long time, but I've never spoken about it: In my career I've managed around 20 people or so at various times. Two of those people were Black.
I cannot tell you how different my supervisors were toward me about how I managed the Black direct reports.
The level of scrutiny and suspicion I got from my bosses was really striking. If they called out sick, it was "Do you believe them?" If they were away from their desk for five minutes it was "Where's so-and-so?"
My regular one-on-ones with my managers (and these were two different people at different organizations! Both white, though) focused so much on how I needed to supervise those reports more directly.
Coworkers, too, would complain to me about things no one once raised about white coworkers: Every typo, any little slip, was treated not as a human error but as proof this person was not competent for the job.
One of these individuals I supervised had a health condition, which was documented with HR, and which I knew the details about because the employee trusted me and chose to tell me. My boss and coworkers regularly expressed doubt that the condition was real.
I handled the health issue appropriately, through HR channels. It frustrated the hell out of my boss, who wanted me to retroactively account for every unexcused absence, every long lunch. Eventually this individual went on short-term disability, which became long-term disability.
There was never anything, at either job, that I would call actionable--no racial slurs, no illegal instructions. Just a lot of pressure, a lot of questioning and doubt about my judgment.
It was a real eye-opener for me as a white man.
Let me say for the record that I respect these managers and coworkers, they were not bad people and I liked almost all of them in general. I don't believe they realized what they were doing.
But boy, that internalized racism was powerful.
I also know that a lot of Black people are gaslit at work, assured that they are treated no differently than anyone else and any perceived difference is in their heads.
In my experience, it is not.
Ah! Something I forgot: My work is in nonprofit fundraising. At both places we hosted semi-formal events, often in private homes. It was standard practice to invite the whole fundraising staff. But in both cases I was asked "Is it appropriate to invite [Black employee]?"
The meaning I was meant to take was "This person is not a fundraiser, they serve an administrative role, so should they be at the event meeting donors?"
But of course I knew that we regularly invited white administrative staff, and that was NEVER questioned.
Thank you to those who have amplified and responded to this thread, especially to those who appropriately called me out on some of my own bias and/or clumsy language.
It's now grown beyond the point where I can respond to every reply, so if I don't respond to you I'm sorry.
To all of the BIPOC who have responded by sharing their own stories about being mistreated, discriminated against, gaslit, and abused or exploited at work: I'm so sorry. You deserve so much better.
To those who rightly point out that my tweet about my colleagues being "not bad people" reflects my own unconscious racism, you are right. In part my phrasing there was not communicating the point I wanted to make, but also yes, it's my own bias coming through. I'll do better.
To those who point out that I didn't challenge my superiors in their behavior: Again, you're right. That was a failing on my part. I should have addressed it with them, even though it scared me to do so. That would be using my privilege for good.
And lastly, to those BIPOC who say you don't need a white dude teaching you what you already know to be true: Hahaha, yes, you are absolutely right.
My goal with sharing this was to reach other white people seeing (or even causing) similar circumstances.
The vast majority of people retweeting, replying, and engaging with this have (based on profile photos) been BIPOC. Which I greatly appreciate. I'd just hope more white folks are at least reading it and maybe learning something--because we can all do better.
Oh, one last point: This is not about me.
I never describe myself as "woke," or "one of the good ones," or an "ally," or anything like that. Because it's not about my identity.
I try to do the work to be anti-racist. It's up to others to judge whether I'm succeeding.
I'm not seeking accolades or praise. Like any human, it feels good to be recognized and appreciated by people I respect, so of course I appreciate that. But that's not why I share this stuff--I share it in hopes I can help make the world better for people who deserve it.
UPDATE 6/23/2020: This thread has been taking off again a little bit today. I usually try to respond to anyone who takes the time to reply to me, but I can't keep up with all the notifications so if you try to talk to me and don't hear back, I apologize.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's another point here which is that voters SAY they dislike partisanship, which is why the Dems are like this... but how do voters even define partisanship?
I just recently had an exchange where I posted on a community message board to explain what New York's ballot propositions did. I was studiously non-partisan, just explaining the mechanics of each, not the implications or who would benefit, etc.
I was immediately accused of "partisanship" because I didn't mention how no-excuse absentee voting would lead to "ballot harvesting" and "much more fraud to benefit the Democrats."
It seems to me that a great way to lose elections is to commit to civility and bipartisanship in an era of record polarization among the electorate.
The Dems seem to think they can make politics less polarized by leading from the top? Meanwhile they GOP wins because they listen to their voters and appeal to that polarization.
I think this has everything to do with the GOP being much, much younger on average.
Like we literally watched a GOP insurrection beat people to death in an effort to overturn our government to get their way... and the Dems dragged their feet on an investigation, insisting on bipartisanship. Do they really not realize how that looks to their voters???
I’m seeing the bad reviews for Eternals, and really wondering if, post-Thanos, viewers want to be done with big MCU epics for a while. Like, it’s over. You told a good story, it was satisfying. Now let’s just chill for a while.
That, and I do think they’re a bit clumsy with how they’re introducing new arcs. With the initial roll-out of Thanos, they made a bunch of stand-alone movies and just dropped TINY hints about the bigger arc that was coming.
Now a lot of projects (Loki) get pretty well sabotaged by the desire to tie in to bigger stories and tease what’s coming next. Even if the big story is fun, each individual piece becomes less satisfying to watch.
Again, it's a shame Americans are never taught how the Nazis came to power (our history classes skip to the war and the Holocaust) because Hawley's arguments here are verbatim how the Nazis recruited young German men.
Americans are raised to think the definition of Nazi is "hates Jews," but what lured millions of Germans to the party were promises to restore traditional masculinity, fight social corruption (porn/sex/homosexuality) and restore Germany to national pride instead of shame.
Which is hugely problematic, because the more you learn about the growth of fascist movements in the early 20th century, the clearer the parallels become with contemporary Republican/conservative rhetoric. It's not hyperbole at all to say this is Nazi talk.
I think I'm not going to have time to make the tombstones I had planned for the yard, which is a shame... I was writing pandemic-related poetry for the headstones.
Here lies Chuck
Cleansed of sin
Ivermectin did him in
Sally's buries
Six feet deep
Her last words
were "You're all sheep!"