When talking w a friend expressing personal pain over the situation in America today- perhaps a black friend who has been followed around in a department store by security, regularly pulled over because they were profiled, 1
or grew up in a neighborhood segregated not by government edict but fatherless-induced poverty, that’s not the time to whip out the fact that only nine unarmed black men were killed by police last year. They don’t need to debate the merits or drawbacks of qualified immunity. 2
They just need you to listen and empathize and “mourn when they mourn.” Compassion needs to be your primary motivation in conversations with friends. (Romans 12:15) 3
But when it comes to policy, don’t let supposed “empathy” supplant clear thinking. That leads you down the destructive path of legislation that feels good but does not do good. Good policy requires we master the facts, be unflinching about statistics, and be sober minded. 4
We do not let the media narrative- either to the left or the right- whip us into an emotional frenzy. Justice needs to be our primary motivation in policy conversations. That means facts over feelings. “Keep your head in all situations.” (2 Tim 4:15) 5
As a Christian you’re called to be both a devoted friend and engaged citizen. Those roles have two different aims and therefore require two different responses. Following Christ requires excellence in both roles. 6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pitching their sob story to a variety of outlets. Beware when stories frame adults who do not get what they want as victims. As always the *children* are the true victims. A few things to note here: 🧵 nypost.com/2025/03/02/wor…
The UK allows altruistic surrogacy, which means women can be reimbursed (often significantly) for "pregnancy expenses" and yet, no woman wanted to be their surrogate… Red flag anyone? So they hired a surrogate abroad. Unlike adoption, there's no screening/background checks.
“The children aren’t able to meet their grandparents.”
OH, I SEE! It's important that the children meet the unrelated parents of the men who purchased them, but not their own biological mother?? Manipulation at its finest.
Everywhere gay marriage goes, children's rights to their bio parents are weakened/obliterated. No country has legalized SS marriage AND strengthened children's relationship to their mother & father. Child rights & gay marriage are incompatible. thembeforeus.com/marriage-marri…
That's exactly what happened in the United States. Once we made husbands and wives optional in marriage, mothers and fathers have become optional in parenthood laws in state after state after state. washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltwa…
Natural reproduction sets limits on the age of motherhood. That benefits children who are more likely to have parental support through their young adulthood, and less likely to care for disabled/geriatric parents.
Surrogacy awards infants to grandparent-aged adults.
One year after she was heralded as the "world's oldest new mother" (age 66) this woman died, leaving her twins not only fatherless, but motherless. theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2…
I bristle slightly (ok, I bristle a lot) when conversations about fighting the #RespectForMarriageAct revolve around #religiousliberty issues. Why? Because what both our foes and our allies hear from religious Americans is, “If gay marriage passes, it will be bad for *me.*”
To which the world responds, “So the prob w gay marriage is, you might have to...bake a cake?? Deal with it, bigot.”
No one's interested in fighting SS marriage (or the myriad other ways the Left is redefining family) if it’s just about minimizing discomfort of religious adults.
But that's how all these conversations come across. Not exactly the approach that will fortify wobbly-kneed Senators or citizens to stand against a cultural onslaught.
Instead, we must forcefully highlight the child-harms of marriage redefinition.
The lives of these children are precious. But make no mistake, in their quest to “become parents”Buttigieg & Chasten have violated the rights of these two children. They have denied these twins not just one mother, but three. 1/4
These babies have been forced to lose their genetic mother, the egg “donor.” Thus these kids (like many other donor children) may experience identity struggles. They will likely seek her out to discover their medical history and behold the woman who reflects their features. 2/4
These children have lost a relationship with their birth mother, the surrogate, inflicting a #primalwound. Many children adopted at birth argue that this separation resulted in difficulty trusting and attaching throughout life. 3/4
My high schooler is explaining her support for #traditionalmarriage to a friend and we drafted a child-centric outline for her case. Here’s it is:
1. Children have a natural right to their mother/father. Adults care which baby they leave the hospital with- they don’t want just any baby. They want *their* baby because biology matters to parents. It matter to kids too.
2. Marriage unites the 2 people to whom children have a natural right and the 2 people statistically most likely to provide love/safety to kids & the relationship which guarantees a perfect gender balance in the home- moms/dads offer distinct/complimentary benefits to kids.