[Thread] On Trump's appropriation of Nazi symbols (yes, really)

It looks like others (@IwriteOK) have brought this up, but, the Trump campaign is using an unmistakably #Holocaust image for political purposes, so, let's talk about this.

m.facebook.com/17711562198405…

Image
Image
Here is the detailed ad info from @facebook. It didn't last long but looked to be a hit in...Texas.

(h/t to @MFrancisWrites who included this in his Medium article )

FB Ad data: bit.ly/2NbiYmd
bit.ly/2BheGXR

Image
Image
The ad was created (or placed) for the Trump campaign by @RedCurvSolution, a conservative fundraising and management firm run by a former Romney campaigner.

@TomCottonAR was a client...so that's fun.
If you click on the triangle, it takes you to a "petition" to get the Trump to call antifa a "terrorist organization."

Bonus: You get to be on a list of names he sees.

(Narrator: he won't see your name.)

True Dear Leader energy here. Image
So, about this triangle: the history.

The triangles were standardized in 1937-1938 to clearly identify prisoners by their "crimes."

(For a great scholarly & accessible read on concentration camp history, see Wachsmann's KL)

amazon.co.uk/dp/0349118663/…
See here the original Nazi scheme (1936) and the meanings of the triangles.
Image
Image
These markings were neither neutral nor benign. They visually codified a tiered system of oppression even within the already oppressive camp system. LGBT and so-called "asocial" prisoners were identified by their triangles and tormented more than other prisoners.

Wachsmann ⬇️ Image
Conversely, "career criminals" with green triangles often received slightly better treatment or positions of authority.

All things being equal, Jews came in for worse treatment.

The SS intentionally used categorization to divide prisoners. Image
Note that another particularly insidious aspect of the triangle choice was that it could be overlaid on a yellow triangle for a Jewish prisoner, thereby creating (and mocking) a Star Of David.

So, this would be a political prisoner who was also Jewish.⬇️ Image
"Political prisoner" in the Nazi world was a very broad category consisting of communists and socialists but also essentially anyone whose views differed from the fascist worldview (democrats and liberals would be included in that as well). They were a diverse group.
Often, they did not get along, bringing their ideological differences into the camp. But often, particularly in camps in Germany, they organized effective resistance.
So, back to the Trump campaign's use of this image. There has been no official statement (nor is there likely to be.) We can speculate about the level of historical awareness in Trumpworld and the depth of meaning here, but it's fair to say they knew what this was.
After all, conservatives have been quick to embrace concentration camp victim symbology (even as they parrot antisemitic rhetoric).
Image
Image
It's hard not to see the use of the red triangle as an attempt to paint antifa as "political enemies" and to insinuate that they should and will meet the same fate as enemies of the Nazis.

This is fully in line with Trump's recent comments about dominating the streets.
It also draws upon a historical connection in which Nazi paramilitary forces were encouraged to violently target political opponents (while political opposition was still possible).

(No, I am not claiming we live in Nazi, Germany. But I didn't choose the symbol. 🤷‍♂️)
This is just another brick in the wall of threats of violence the Trump administration has been building of late.

Moreover, as the shooting in NM shows, these threats are no longer theoretical, but very real and injurious.

theguardian.com/us-news/video/…
And so we continually see that symbols matter and they send messages that may rapidly gain unintended (or intended) meanings that result in very real blood being shed.
As always, be a responsible consumer of #history. Symbols don't arise from nowhere; they have a history.

And they have consequences.

Support your local historian and punch your local #Nazi (metaphorically, of course, unless they hit you first.)

#twitterstorians Image
P.S.- I meant to include this in the thread as I think it is important in the context of #PrideMonth.

The LGBTQ community reappropriated the Nazi camp symbol for gay people (the pink triangle). They chose this in part as a way to reclaim power.

time.com/5295476/gay-pr…
I can't help but think that the Trump campaign's use of a different triangle (but with similar meaning) can be seen as further evidence of the homophobic and intolerant nature of the administration.
Update: Apparently Facebook took down the ad. So, yay? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with  Dr. Waitman W. Beorn (@waitmanwbeorn.com 🟦)🇺🇦

 Dr. Waitman W. Beorn (@waitmanwbeorn.com 🟦)🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @waitmanb

Apr 21
🧵 On German memory and forgetting about the Third Reich

Was watching a #Holocaust documentary and it includes this interview with a former Hitler Youth/Luftwaffe member.

Listen to what he says about what he knew about the concentration camps.
"The entire operation was concealed so the majority of people didn't know about it."

No...my goodness, no.
He then suggests that the Nazis wanted to keep it secret from the people because "the majority of the people wouldn't agree with that."

But...that's a very apologetic view. Because it's quite clear that anti-Jewish measures were very popular throuhgout Germany.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 20
Anyone arguing for an auto-loader is not a serious person.

You heard it here.
Ok, so I should probably add something besides snark.

Why are human loaders better?

1) They are usually faster.
2) They are ALWAYS more reliable.
3) They can help with maintenance/refueling/rearming/etc
4) They are an extra set of eyes scanning for threats
5) They perform the role of air guard watching the sky and the rear sector of the tank.
6) They operate a third machine gun
7) The loader position allows a new soldier to immerse themselves in a crew and really learn the other jobs they will eventually have to do.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 16
🧵 On Those Classic Cultural Twitter Accounts

Someone on here questioned why I would say that accounts like the one below are dog whistles for white supremacy.

Well, ok. Let's do this. Image
This account has over a million followers and posts seemingly innocuous images of admittedly BEAUTIFUL buildings.

Of course, 99% of them are...er...the creations of white Europeans located in Europe.
Much of the genre of their account is lamenting the supposed loss of a world that generated these artistic genres and buildings.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 41 tweets
Apr 11
🧵 On Nazi "efficiency"

It's a good point!

I can speak mainly from the perspective of the Holocaust but I can give a few examples here:
There are several version of this (in the Holocaust context) one applied to the killing process and the other to Jewish policy in general.

I'll start with the latter first. There is a popular misconception of the Nazi bureaucracy as this ruthlessly efficient system but... no.
First, despite their supposed clear racial ideology, the Nazis had real difficulties in identifying targets.

For example, while Jewishness was a supposed genetic characteristic, there was (obv) no scientific test for this.
Read 17 tweets
Nov 12, 2023
🧵 Ok...let's talk about Hamas and Nazis and reluctance to kill, etc. etc.

Of late, certain people on here have made some very weird (and very bad) arguments about the Nazis in light of the war in Israel.
Here's a sampling:

Image
Image
Image
And in this article here (linked below)
thejc.com/lets-talk/all/…
Image
Read 42 tweets
Oct 13, 2023
🧵Lots of people talking (mostly incorrectly) about proportionality in terms of an Israeli response, so here's some thoughts from a military/LOAC (law of war) perspective.

✅Acceptable responses:
- Kill/capture Hamas fighters/leadership
- Capture/destroy Hamas weapons/ammo

/1
- Operations to free hostages
- Destroy infrastructure SPECIFICALLY USED by Hamas
- Targeted killing of Hamas leadership
- Blockade of Gaza to prevent weapons/military equipment entering (after inspection, allowing other essential supplies in)

/2
❌Unacceptable responses:
- "Punitive" or reprisal operations against civilians
- Use of starvation against civil population
- Indiscriminate bombing/destruction of civilian infrastructure

/3
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(