fuck it I want the world to burn after what they did to Uhlig
is everyone aware that the American Economic Association was founded
by white eugenicists
and promoted their agenda aggressively in its early years?
lets consult an expert Scholarly source
I havent even gotten to economists yet but we have got to put a stop to all Fields
Biology? Canceled. Law? Canceled. Theater, literature, the Democratic Party, the State of Wisconsin but especially its University?
You better believe that's a cancelling
Socialism? CANCELED
The Left? CANCELED
Birth control? CANCELED
(overall I would say the Catholic Church is the last man standing think about THAT)
lets turn now to the eras Progressive economists
Have you heard the tragedy of Commons?
I thought not. It is not a story the AEA would tell you
Its a Eugenic's story
meanwhile, AEA cofounder Simon Patten was Breeding Supermen and measuring skulls
(@newrepublic: canceled as fuck)
i wonder what view's @AEAjournals published about black people
(@Prudential: canceled. Is it not the same firm? Tear it for its bad verses)
(Sociology: canceled)
And now it gets interesting.
@HowardU? Canceled.
WEB Du Bois: toast
wonder what the future 28th president of the United states was up to during these times
I think my point is clear
Any discipline or entity with its origins in the progressive era must be Purged
As a starting point, here is what I suggest
I have in my hand a list of 500--a list of names which are known to be members of the American Economics Association and who are nevertheless still working and shaping policy in economics across the United States
@DistractedAnna @wrongbutkind Happy to field questions as you like. I know the most about economics, but some lessons are broadly applicable, and this is a good place to get inside information on navigating schools.
Good luck, and stay safe. 🙏
@selentelechia so skimming, a few years later, i notice @ProfEmilyOster signed this letter and i no longer feel bad about what mommy groups are doing to her and in fact you know what i hope they succeed in cancelling her
economics is outstanding amongst the social scientists in its willingness to consider second-order effects
so we shouldnt be surprised that with typical lucidity, cancellations in the field are not just for an alleged offender, but for his defenders too
im aware of a group of chinese economists with evidence suggesting we implement cancellations out to nine degrees of separation but they havent put out a working paper yet so i think its a bit early to discuss the results
everyone on this list should frankly die of shame
imbens is especially disappointing to me
whole fucking profession letting me down but him in particular. i looked up to him.
the reason that nerds are unhappy about trump firing federal reserve people isnt because they particularly like those specific people
issue is that it makes the fed look beholden to the executive and this is a very bad outcome for economic stability
the fed hasnt covered itself in glory lately for sure but the counterfactual where its progressively and openly politicized is pretty much just a world of hyperinflation and impoverishment because thats a side effect of how unstable governments use politicized central banks
i think a steelman for "end the fed" is that we've left this absurdly powerful yet nigh defenseless institution sitting in plain sight like a loaded gun during a period of immensely high trust and as that period comes to a close someone is gonna make a first grab at the pistol
ok finally discovered a kind of lore i want to know about in a non clickbait way:
what one-shotted you?
eg for me it was 90s movies about how having a career and a house in the burbs is the worst thing that can ever happen to someone
i didn't realize i'd been Had until my 30s
everyone will give boomers and millennials shit about the social justice and narcissism, and rightly so. but the motherfuckers who tricked me into nearly ruining my life are genx
for those of you not familiar getting one shotted is getting wrecked on first contact with something. classic deployment attached
"everyone is the same and nations are fake" is the core dogma of the mid-late 20C liberalism that grew out of the war era. in the years since it's become a mostly-unstated and broadly-unassailable assumption of imperial policy
regrettably it is also disastrously incorrect
the history of this idea is worth studying. you can see the modern notion start to emerge in the progressive era and out of socialist thought, and gain some traction with (eg) the league of nations
ideologues might say that league failed bc it wasn't REAL world government
among socialism-inclined intellectuals, which is to say nearly all intellectuals until molotov-ribbentrop broke some out of their reveries, ww1 was understood to be a failure _caused by_ national identity
the leftist compulsion to degrade national identity in democratic countries will be the undoing of their welfare state plank, because it turns out when you remove the nation people just default to narrower identities and don't care to pay for the outgroup's well-being
you can get support for fargroups in time limited cases. there's a long history of (eg) american assistance for people on the other side of the world in disaster recovery
but duration breeds resentment, and organized charity is very hard to maintain with this sentiment
when you're talking about an outgroup for whom that resentment is ingrained and continuously salient, forget it
"multiculturalism" kills welfare states in the long run
amusingly this was one reason some of the more libertarian neoliberals supported open borders
i was disappointed that liberals did nothing in the face of the awokening. but that can at least be explained as cowardess
what's worse is that the awokening is over, they're not taking the fact that the awokening occurred as a serious problem to be guarded against going forward
one is left with the impression that either they are fine with everything that happened or they learned absolutely nothing from the experience. both of these possibilities seem disqualifying
what is the point of liberals who can't be bothered to care for liberty, one wonders