People sometimes ask why I'm so generally poorly disposed towards technical solutions that seek to implement "social engineering" of one or other forms.
This is a fine exemplar of what happens when motivated but technically illiterate people, bodge a solution.
It's not just #TrackAndTrace, the same goes for self-interested private enterprise pursuing #AgeVerification and hoping for a Government mandate to drive profitability:
And also for every civil society wonk, pundit, or good-natured academic who fervently believes that if only the tech companies would listen to *them* that they would be able to solve {cyber bullying, fraud, hate speech, misinformation, exploitation, …} link.medium.com/n1BK85M3t7
Footnote: I am entirely convinced that some of the people who are/were working on this are extremely technically competent. Doesn't matter, because if they are suckered into implementing a "white elephant" then they clearly lack any leverage.
Hot on the heels of #ChatControl and in the name of “identity” and “consumer choice” the EU seeks the ability to undetectably spy on HTTPS communication; 300+ experts say “no” to #Article45 of #eIDAS #QWAC alecmuffett.com/article/108139
If you would like to see more discussion regarding:
Regulation: EU Digital Identity Framework — including #eIDAS and #QWAC
When Signal and WhatsApp have fled the surveillance of the #OnlineSafetyBill, what app will still be around for politicans, journalists, and actual normal people to use, securely.
@JohnNaulty @matrixdotorg Let's be clear: we are talking about the evacuation of the entire Signal and WhatsApp userbase / niche, from the United Kingdom.
That's a lot of people.
WOW:
- No Signal
- No WhatsApp
- No iMessage
- No Facetime
@jamesrbuk called it #internexit; the UK will be extraordinarily isolated from the rest of the internet.
A big part of the the reason for the existence of that API was because the European Union wanted to enable people to access their data; so they created the problem, complained when the inevitable leaks happened, and are now reinventing it
Could be the attached, but my suspicion is that this is going to be another CYBER! DARKWEB! CYB3R! SYBER! CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA‼️BRAIN CONTORL! YOU SAW AN ADVERT AND SO A RUSSIAN ARTIFISHIAL INTELLIGENCE APP MADE YOU VOTE FOR UKIP! … thing.
Plucky spooks in Cheltenham but dressed for speed-dating in 2015-era Shoreditch, battle "Russian influence operations" that Nadine Dorries will soon cite as rationale for the #OnlineSafetyBill.
Token American subplots help sell the series to the US.
Back in 1991 I published an open-source password cracking tool which defined the state of the art for the next 5+ years, so much so that echoes of it can be found in all major password crackers of today.
Some folk criticised me for doing this, choosing words like these to do so:
I know that in general it's bad form to take a single quote out of context and use it to critique an entire essay (concerned.tech) — but I do feel that this time it's deserved.
The concerned-dot-tech essay has had extensive technical debunking, e.g.: