The #LabourTogether report contains a clear strategy to win - but the left has to take part and own it, not stand on the sidelines defending a strategy that failed 1/ newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
2/ Scotland is the strategic issue for Labour and it has the wrong position - on the second referendum and on independence: but there's a route to a left government as long as the Union lasts... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
3/ The key proposal: we try to unite socially liberal and "authoritarian" voters around a big change economic agenda... but we can't wish away the huge cultural divide, and a different strategy than "it's the same wherever you live"... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
4/ Plus we focus ruthlessly on economic, social and climate justice - and nothing else. We learn to stop treating Labour manifestos as a dartboard for worthy causes. The obsessions of the pro-Putin crowd are designed to lose Labour votes... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
5/ A left government could - a) decarbonise the economy b) break with global finance c) attack inequality d) raise wellbeing across a wide range of indicators e) radically redistribute power. *If the left gets on board with Starmer* newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
6/ The British left never understood what's wrong with "economism" - the working class, via the party, has to fight for moral and intellectual leadership of the country. Gramsci's "war of position". We need to start it now... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
7/ So the left faces a choice: sit on the sidelines defending a manifesto and a narrative that were rejected, blaming 80% of the membership and our 10 million voters for "capitulating to the bourgeois PV campaign" (snore) ... newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
8/ ...or engage with the Starmer project. That doesn't mean failing to criticise him. It means creating a party that becomes a vehicle for dialogue between progressive and socially conservative sections of the working class... it's the only route to power. newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
9/ The common experience - from Leigh to Lambeth - is powerlessness. The commonly accepted solutions, across both sections of the working class, revolve around "family, work, fairness and decency": the left has to address that agenda newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
9/ Winning is hard. It involves thinking and rethinking - and you have to be guided by theory and evidence. The Labour Together report, and the Datapraxis work it's based on, are the first real attempt I've seen the party make at doing that. newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Morgan McSweeney resigns - here's some basic politics for any member of the Labour Party: 1/ We cannot have a leadership contest now. Why? Because the bond market is a "daily referendum on UK political stability"...the right wing press baying for Keir to resign know this ...
2/ The rat pack of podcasters and YouTubers will have a field day stoking up chaos... a doom loop of bad headlines and soaring bond yields. Therefore Keir Starmer has to remain PM. Let's have a clear report from the ISC - and it should not be difficult to get to the point...
3/ ... did the DV process throw up any problems with Mandelson? Did the security services warn anyone? Once we have that information there is a story to tell about what went wrong ...
In a jaw dropping interview with Channel 4 News, Zack Polanski claims he wants both "to reform NATO from within" and replace it with "an alternative alliance of countries based in Europe… plus Brazil and Mexico and global south countries"... let's unpack... 1/
2/ NATO is an alliance formed by treaty. It is the lynchpin of the rules based global order, together with the UN. All 31 countries are signed up to defend each other. Can you imagine what would happen if we, the 5th biggest economy, left it?
3/ If the UK left NATO it would collapse. There would not be "an alliance of UK with other European countries plus Mexico and Brasil" - there would be the Russian occupation of Estonia, Lithuania, probably Svalbard and likely the collapse of Ukraine...
Zack Polanski's puerile name-calling during an international crisis is testament to a profound lack of seriousness... here's the sum total of the GPEW's response so far... 🧵1/~
2/~ Starmer has not "appeased" Trump. He has conducted tough diplomacy over Ukraine, talking Trump back from a total sell-out; he has banned all relevant arms sales to Israel; and on Greenland he has made defence of Danish sovereignty and Greenlanders self-determination a red line
3/~ But at the last election the GPEW did NOT say "relying on US for nukes is dangerous"... they said give up nuclear weapons unilaterally... here's the manifesto...
Russia's talking point of the day already being echoed by useful idiot savants ... "They can't invade Europe because they couldn't defeat Ukraine" - here's why that's wrong ... 1/ They have 350k troops in Belarus trained to do exactly that ...
2/ Russia just carried out an attack exercise in Belarus where it practised only with its strategic forces - showing how it will use lessons learned in Ukraine to menace Europe once there is a frozen conflict in Ukraine
3/ Specifically Russia has 3x options - destabilise Moldova, seize Svalbard, attack a Baltic state - in each case it may judge that with Guardianista useful idiots and "actionists" plus far right parties in W Europe - and Trump in power - NATO would not respond... but...
I'm a China hawk but I am sick of Tory duplicity and 💩 Fleet Street commentary on "why don't we designate China a threat"? Neither Johnson, Sunak nor Truss did so, despite Truss threatening... and here's why: 1/ This is what a "threat" to National Security looks like...
2/ ... it's a nuclear capable Russian aircraft with a missile that can travel at Mach 10: three of them spent 12 minutes in NATO airspace last month... and the RAF regularly has to intercept these and other Russian threats...
3/ In 2021 the Tory govt recognised China as a "systemic competitor" - that is, a country determined to compete with us over economic interests, values and geopolitical influence... then, in 2022, China overtly backed the Russian invasion of Ukraine....
I just used my fingerprint to log into my Apple computer; I used facial recognition to pay for an e-bike on my Apple phone; I ordered a repeat prescription on the NHS app that holds every detail of every illness I have ever been treated for on a central server...1/
2/ ... I had to show my drivers' licence to get into a briefing from a civil servant; I used the e-gates at LCY to cross the border without having to speak to a human being... why would I object to "the state" issuing me with digital proof of ID?...
3/... Labour must of course address privacy concerns and the possibility of cyberattacks on a single digital ID - but there are massive libertarian and economic upsides to a society where *everybody is who they say they are*...