Woke Mind Virus Profile picture
Jun 27, 2020 3 tweets 3 min read Read on X
White Fragility: New York Times #1 Bestseller. Racism is a serious subject that deserves serious attention and a serious theory. White Fragility is not a serious theory. Retweet to raise awareness. @jondavidchurch @HPluckrose @ConceptualJames @GadSaad #WhiteFragility #Whiteness Image
Maybe @HueyFreeman3241 will read this paper and we can have a serious discussion 🤔 without ad hominems 😬and accusations that I'm a White Supremacist. Would be nice. 😀
If anybody is interested in reading the entire paper, it can be found here:

files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ106…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Woke Mind Virus

Woke Mind Virus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WokeMV

Oct 14, 2023
👩🏻‍🎓 “Sit in your discomfort.”

It’s a valid concept. When examining a new idea that is counter to our worldview, we can experience discomfort, cognitive dissonance.

A thoughtful person sits in that discomfort & examines the idea. They try to be aware of their prejudices....
& biases and examine that idea while being aware of their prejudices & biases.

But that doesn’t make the idea correct.

That’s where the concept gets abused. That’s where the manipulation begins. The manipulation is twofold:
1) Social Justice/Race/Activist “scholars” take that discomfort as proof that their ideas are correct;

and

2) Social Justice/Race/Activist “scholars” consider only one reason for that discomfort: the person’s prejudices & biases.....
Read 16 tweets
Oct 2, 2023
The scientific method (White Fragility style):

1. Make an observation. (White people are sensitive when talking about race.)
2. Generate a hypothesis. (This is because of White Fragility.)
3. Brainstorm for other explanations. (Not necessary.)... Image
4. Test your hypothesis. (Not necessary.)
5. Be careful not to insert your biases and untested ideas. (We live in a White Supremacist society, people react this way to protect their privilege, We must decolonize…))
6. Draw a conclusion. (All my untested ideas are right.)...
7. Publish your findings and open yourself up to criticism & questioning. (Not necessary. If White people disagree, it is because of White Fragility. If Black people disagree, it’s because they have False Consciousness. Case closed. No reason to discuss.)
Read 5 tweets
May 15, 2023
My first experience with Wokeness was in Austin, Texas in 1988.

I went to university excited to meet the free-thinkers of the world, the professors and students who wanted to discuss ideas and how to improve society.

What I found was . . . Image
. . . a gaggle of angry, mean-spirited, bullying people who wrapped their quasi-religious ideology in the flag of tolerance, inclusion & diversity.

There were no discussions. You either believed – or you were a bad person. End of discussion. Image
Race was their obsession. I soon realized that for these largely privileged, sheltered white people, the goal was not battling racism or helping a long-oppressed underclass. Or even to examine your own biases.

The goal was to achieve moral superiority with minimal sacrifice.
Read 19 tweets
Apr 16, 2023
Racism. It's an important subject. It's led to oppression, wars & genocides. We need good scholarship.

For this important subject, Dr. Robin DiAngelo is one of our leading scholars. Image
And when the scholar met her first real-life Black people, when she was in her 30s. Image
Some of her scholarship. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 6, 2023
It's an interesting concept.

It's a central tenet of the scholar's ideology.

The scholar doesn't explore the concept in any depth.

Let's explore it for him. . . . Image
1. “A racist idea is any idea that suggests one racial group is inferior or superior to another racial group in any way.” -- [HTBAA, page 20] ✓

2. “An antiracist idea is any idea that suggests the racial groups are equals in all their apparent differences.”
3. “Antiracist ideas argue that racist policies are the cause of racial inequities.” [p.20]

Let's reify:

👧🏽 👨🏽🍦 “Daddy, I have an idea. Let’s go get some ice-cream!”
Read 12 tweets
Apr 5, 2023
Collective guilt. You are guilty of the sins committed in the past & present by people who looked like you.

🤔The Jews killed Jesus. You are a Jew.
🤔Muslims commit terrorism. You are a Muslim.
🤔Blacks commit more crimes. You are black.
🤔Germans killed Jews. You are a German. Image
I'm not saying it's a bad concept. I'm just thinking about it.

It has been used in racial profiling to justify stopping people on the basis of their race. And for judging people by their group membership.
The Old Testament doesn't like it. Islam doesn't like it. DiAngelo likes it.

Maybe DiAngelo has it right and the Old Testamanent and the Quran has it wrong. 🤔
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(