Center for Reproductive Rights Profile picture
Jun 29, 2020 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
ICYMI: In a big win this morning, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in our case, June Medical Services vs. Russo, striking down Louisiana's admitting privileges law as unconstitutional. #MyRightMyDecision

A statement from our President & CEO, Nancy Northup, on the ruling:
"This is a big win that vindicates what we’ve said all along, which is that the Louisiana admitting privileges law is unconstitutional. This is a victory for the people of Louisiana and the rule of law, but this case never should have gotten this far.
We won an identical case four years ago in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and the fact that we had to fight so hard again goes to show that nothing should be taken for granted when it comes to protecting abortion rights.
Indeed, the Court did not speak with a clear majority opinion which could muddy the waters when clarity is needed to protect abortion rights.

As a result of this decision, the clinics in Louisiana can stay open to serve the one million women of reproductive age in the state.
This is critical because access to abortion care has a profound impact on a person’s health and life. For this reason, the Constitution protects the most intimate decisions that a person makes about their body, their health, their life, and their future.
Yet for decades, opponents of reproductive rights have relentlessly sought to deny the promise of Roe v. Wade with an avalanche of laws targeting providers, clinics, and patients.
These laws disproportionately impact communities of color, young people, rural communities, and people living in poverty. In Louisiana, abortion restrictions disproportionately harm African Americans who already live under the weight of systemic racism...
that pervades every aspect of American life including housing, voting, education, employment, and health. Louisiana lawmakers should be addressing these ingrained inequities rather than taking people’s rights away.
Unfortunately, the Court’s ruling today will not stop those hell-bent on banning abortion. We will be back in court tomorrow and will continue to fight state by state, law by law to protect our constitutional right to abortion. But we shouldn’t have to keep playing whack-a-mole.
It’s time for Congress to pass The Women’s Health Protection Act, a federal bill that would ensure the promise of Roe v. Wade is realized in every state for every person."

#ActForWomen

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Center for Reproductive Rights

Center for Reproductive Rights Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReproRights

Jun 12
WATCH: Our courageous client Lauren Miller testified today before the Senate Judiciary Committee about her terrifying experience being denied emergency abortion care under Texas's extreme ban.
Lauren, a plaintiff in our major Zurawski v. Texas abortion rights case, needed abortion care to save her own life, and the life of her viable twin.
Even though her doctors were ready and willing to provide the lifesaving care Lauren needed, Texas's laws instead forced her to flee the state at one of the most vulnerable moments of her life.
Read 5 tweets
May 31
Dr. Dennard, an OBGYN and a plaintiff in our Zurawski v TX case, got emotional when she heard the verdict from the Texas Supreme Court. Texas ruled against Dr. Dennard and 20+ other plaintiffs who sued the state after being denied abortions amid dire pregnancy complications.
Dr. Dennard understands the harsh reality of living under Texas’ criminal abortion ban better than anyone. Last summer, she had to flee the state when her own pregnancy was diagnosed with anencephaly, a lethal genetic condition where the brain and skull don’t completely form.
On top of that, Dr. Dennard also has to think of her patients. Because of the extreme criminal penalties written into the state’s cruel ban, she has to think critically about what she can and cannot say to patients experiencing severe pregnancy complications.
Read 4 tweets
May 22
LET DOCTORS PRACTICE MEDICINE. That's the common sense request being made in an urgent new letter to the US Supreme Court signed by 6,000 doctors from all 50 states.
🧵Here's what you need to know.
The letter was published as SCOTUS considers a MAJOR abortion case with the potential to utterly unravel the standards of emergency medical care—not just abortion care—across the country.
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) says all hospitals receiving Medicare funds must provide emergency stabilizing care to patients who arrive to the ER crashing. For patients in a pregnancy emergency, abortion care is often the treatment needed.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 26
⚠️With the abortion pill case going before the US Supreme Court today, here are some important reminders about mifepristone, the medication in question.
Mifepristone is extremely safe. ­­­In addition to a 20+ year track record of use in the US, the medication’s safety is documented in more than 100 peer-reviewed articles.
Leading medical and scientific organizations recognize mifepristone as safe and effective including the American Medical Association and the American Congress of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG). It is also classified as an essential medicine by the World Health Organization.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 22
NEWS OUT OF TEXAS: Today, the Texas Medical Board announced that they are publishing proposed rules to purportedly ‘clarify’ exceptions to the state’s harsh abortion bans. However, these rules fall seriously short of the clarity needed.
“The rules Texas Medical Board proposed today contain more of the same rhetoric we have been hearing for years: that physicians should just read the language of the exception and exercise their reasonable medical judgment.” -Molly Duane, @ReproRights Senior Staff Attorney
Further, these rules create a burdensome documentation system physicians must use when providing an abortion, including documenting whether there was ‘adequate time to transfer the patient’ ‘by any means available’ to a different facility to avoid having to perform an abortion.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 28
🔴LIVE: The @SenateBudget Committee is hosting a hearing on the devastating economic impacts of abortion bans. The committee will hear from @ReproRights' Tennessee plaintiff Allie Phillips and other experts. Tune in now and follow our live coverage: budget.senate.gov/hearings/no-ri…
@SenateBudget "Reproductive rights, it turns out, are intrinsically tied to economic opportunity. Reproductive justice is economic justice. Restricting one restricts the other." -@SenWhitehouse Image
“[The] freedom to decide if and when to have a child affects a women’s life trajectory and her family’s financial security. Women denied an abortion who had to carry a pregnancy to term were 4x more likely to live in poverty." -@SenWhitehouse
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(