What I have found is that the most important decisions are not easily formalized this way.
It first transforms into "What do we *believe* we ought to do?" and then it becomes "What is our core conviction?" and that leads to the eventual "Who am I?"
It is perfectly valid to not have a conviction on a topic (start at zero), but if we really want to make a difference with our actions, we must find one, but we cannot force it.
How can we hold a strong conviction and be non-egoistic? Evaluate calmly the idea that we could be wrong!
How well does it hold up under that scrutiny?
Sometimes my colleagues are exposed to that debate and they can get confused 😂
Have I changed my mind on something big? The most important issue is formal credentials. I obtained a PhD and that was out of my youthful conviction that they matter. I made a U-turn.
It was blasphemy - the prestige of Princeton was supposed to quell those questions!
It was tough to accept too.
I ask people to contemplate that without emotional baggage.
Eastern spirituality teaches us to calmly accept the inevitability of death and the impermanence of the body and our material attachments.
That's an important attitude in business.
Avoiding that dualistic trap is how we achieve inner peace and calm. 🙏
