We thought we'd do a thread on reasons to dislike Toby Daniel Moorsom Young. All of these are variations on the same theme: that Toby Young is foetid bellend.
He spends much of his time throwing shitbombs at any moves towards equality and inclusion because it highlights and undermines his enormous white, male, middle class privilege.
He can't imagine why a lot of people in higher education are left leaning, even though much of their lives are spent developing a criticality which is then personally or professionally used to think about the unfair world we live in.
*He thinks that the closure of up to half of universities *is a good thing. The deleterious economic and social effects this would have on countless students, staff, and towns seems to be lost on him.
This mass closure of universities would, it seems, save the world from the spread of wokeness - which, of course, would preserve his advantage while continuing to marginalise PoC, those with disabilities, women, working class (etc) groups.
If a lot of universities closed, no doubt his alma mater, Oxford (which he only got into because his dad pulled some strings btw) would survive. Research aside, Oxford's position, selectivity and culture are a suppurating boil on British society.
He assumes - in spite of the absence of evidence - that universities are against free speech; he'd rather preserve a situation where you can insult, denigrate, and traumatise entire groups of people without sanction.
He asserts that private and public education has been fully converted into a space where the history of Britain is taught as entirely negative. He hasn't looked at the National Curriculum or Fundamental British Values, then.
He claims that the leftwards shift in education/society is creating space for populism as only the middle classes attain wokeness and this divides society. Seems he's never met a working class socialist or #BLM advocate.
He's a self-nominated leader of 'the resistance', resisting a world where more and more people look at him and his ilk and see that they're sociopaths protecting their own advantage and/or have no idea of the lived experience of marginalisation.
The strikes are hurting unis, raising solidarity, but the pain is mostly felt by staff/students. Unis lose face (a bit – press coverage sucks), are inconvenienced, but it's abundantly clear *managers don’t care* about HE/HE people.
Industrial action's impact on unis is watered as limited to specific union members who will/can afford to, ASOS/strike. But unless (and even if) union membership were greater, we’re limited by anti-union legislation and that we care so deeply about our work and students.
2/
There was a great thread (that we can’t find) by @JamesBSumner on the varied personal/political reasons that folks don’t engage with unions locally/nationally. It’s nuanced, not either/or. We need more membership, coordination between unions AND to co-opt non-union peeps.
3/
Here's our Manifesto to address some of the fundamental problems in UK HE. 🧵
1. PENSIONS
USS gets told in no uncertain terms to sort their shit out, accept a prudent prediction that isn't based on imminent apocalypse, and to pay livable pensions. 1/9 #OneOfUsAllOfUs#UCUstrike
2. GENDER, RACE, AND DISABILITY INEQUALITY
All HEIs to commit to attaining Athena Swan Gold AND the Race Equality Charter as a first step towards deep cultural change. Also to develop and implement an equivalent scheme for disability. 2/9 #OneOfUsAllOfUs#UCUstrike
3. PAY
All staff to get a 5% pay raise, with a further £2K* for all women and an additional £2K* for all people in racial/ethnic minorities. If that pushes them beyond their current pay bracket, promote them. 3/9 (*Or pro Rata Equivalent) #OneOfUsAllOfUs#UCUstrike
…not least because the UK is institutionally racist, and these issues are highlighted (and magnified) in educational experiences and outcomes.
An evidence-based thread…🧵
1/
Before we get going, there is no profusion or absence of ability/talent or aspiration/ambition in any racial or ethnic group. Assuming the former is true is racist; the latter is used to explain away social inequalities. We do NOT live in a meritocracy. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
2/
There are deep racial inequalities in education, with major variations between groups. These are gendered and classed (among other things) but factoring in these other dimensions still exposes racial inequalities. @NicolaRollock@CarolVincent100 tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
3/
Don't know who need to hear this*, but reducing tuition fees for *mostly* online learning might seem like common sense, but in fact it's not...universities can't reduce fees for a host of reasons.
N.B. a): 'Tuition Fee' is a misnomer. It pays for academic time and expertise in teaching, but also cleaning and maintenance, administration, the library, tech, some research, widening participation bursaries, MH and other support. And management and marketing.
N.B. b): Expensive to run courses (engineering, medicine etc) are subsidised by 'cheaper' ones (social sciences, arts/humanities). Having lower/variable fees messes this (and access issues) up, as does likely earnings. In short: the £9K+ sticker price is a mess.
Apologies for the white hot ranty thread, but the Covid situation has highlighted how fundamental the problems are in higher education.
Headline Point: University leaderships really don't care about staff or students. A short thread.
1/
Everyone* knew this was coming. The situation wasn't ever fully under control, the movement of people across the world/country, into close proximity, was high risk. Staff and students would get sick, some would die.
*Except the head of UK's Track and Trace, apparently.
2/
UK Universities are in a situation where, often excessively mortgaged, they're always looking to cut costs and maximise income. Staff were already overworked and students are seen as numbers on a spreadsheet - although not by front line staff.
3/
A large group of people goes to a restaurant and places their orders. The food comes, and despite protestations that the portions are both miserly and incorrect, the management insists that this is all they’re getting. The people are hungry, so they eat it. #examshambles
1/
Just as they’re finishing their meals, the management returns and says that they had in fact been given the wrong food. Therefore, to make amends, they would now be given the right food, but this time in supersized portions. #examshambles
2/
The older members of the group, who belong to the landed gentry, are experts in gluttony. They not only tuck in but also steal their neighbours' food. The victims protest to the management who claim helplessness but wink conspiratorially at the gluttons. #examshambles
3/