Same lineup in House case, 7-2. More to come
Court says neither side's test satisfactory
"The standards proposed by the President and the Solicitor General—if applied outside the context of privileged information—would risk seriously impeding Congress in carrying out its responsibilities, giving
short shrift to its important interests in ..."
short shrift to its important interests in ..."
"conducting inquiries to obtain
information needed to legislate effectively"
information needed to legislate effectively"
"The approach proposed by the House, which relies on precedents
that did not involve the President’s papers, fails to take adequate account of the significant separation of powers issues raised by congressional subpoenas for the President’s information. "
that did not involve the President’s papers, fails to take adequate account of the significant separation of powers issues raised by congressional subpoenas for the President’s information. "
