Dale Johnson Profile picture
Jul 9, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Few tweets on FIFA taking over the management of the VAR project from the IFAB, and what it really means the Premier League (including a mention of the Harry Kane penalty claim).

But first, remember this. FIFA says the implementation of VAR has been a "universal success".
By taking over control of the VAR project, what FIFA really wants to do it make sure all associations are doing it the same way.

So it doesn't want the Premier League not using monitors, not penalising the GK off the line on pens, etc.
The new Laws of the Game, which will come into force in the Premier League at the start of next season, had already removed ambiguity over use of monitors in the VAR protocol.

So, in effect, FIFA taking control is not a catalyst for the PL using monitors. This is already set.
FIFA taking control only really means that it will set expectations that leagues will follow the protocol.

Several comps (not just PL) do not penalise the keeper for being an inch off the line on a penalty.

It's a bad law change, but the law will likely be enforced now.
One thing FIFA cannot do is change the subjective decision making of referees, or the competence of referees in individual leagues.

Yes, FIFA does control the education of referees globally. But there is a big step to changing the level of ability - certainly in the short term.
Take today's decision on the Harry Kane penalty. This is the process.

If the referee, Paul Tierney, tells the VAR, Michael Oliver, that he had a clear view of the incident and did not feel there was sufficient contact for Kane to go down, there will be no penalty. #BOUTOT
The Premier League's high bar, and refusal to use the monitors on subjective penalty decisions, means that any possible overturn sits with the VAR and how he interprets what the match referee has seen.

This alone makes it much more difficult for an overturn to happen.
This becomes a bigger problem if referees are missing more big decisions than you might expect in an elite league.

VAR seems better in the UCL, for example, because that competition only uses top referees.

Once you get to league level, ability and consistency will be lower.
So the use of monitors will undoubtedly be a positive addition, both for the accountability of referees and acceptance from fans.

But it's going to come down to two key things
1) Officials being good, as refs and VARs
2) How high the "bar" will be in the Premier League
Premier League referees have tied themselves up in knots over this high bar, and the lack of monitors.

It's the perfect storm of the VAR not being sure if he should overrule the referee, but not having the safety net of asking the referee to take a look himself.
But FIFA taking charge isn't going to stop the goals being disallowed for tight offsides, minor handballs and such like.

FIFA will be about consistency of application. The leagues themselves are still going to have to get this right "on the ground."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

Jul 8
UEFA has confirmed the seeding rule for the QF and SF of its competitions, including Champions League, for next season.

We knew draws were to be removed for QF and SF, but not the specifics of how the home team in the second legs would be determined.

Good one for Arsenal fans.
Key theory:

Teams ranked 1-4 guaranteed to be at home in the QF.
Teams ranked 1-2 guaranteed to be at home in the SF.

However, if any of 1-4 are knocked out, seeding is not recalculated. Home advantage is effectively tied to the result of the round of 16, and then QF.
Therefore, even though Arsenal (3rd place) played PSG (15th place) in the semifinals, Arsenal would NOT be seeded at play the second leg at home if the same were to happen next season.

PSG have priority in the SF as they took the right off Liverpool (1st) by knocking them out.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 16
This does not bode well for Crystal Palace.

Drogheda also won the cup but are excluded from the Conference League due to ownership rules.

Sister club Silkeborg stay in because they finished 7th, with Drogheda (9th) removed.
The deadline for separating associated clubs into a blind trust was changed from June 1 to March 1 as of this year.

That's very harsh for a club such as Palace as they would have needed to do this after the FA Cup fourth round, which seems completely unrealistic.
Drogheda qualified for Europe last November, as cup winners.

But Silkeborg didn't qualify for the Conference League until June 1 through a playoff, three months after the blind trust deadline.

NB: no Irish club will replace Drogheda as there's no time to get a licence.
Read 5 tweets
May 28
REVEALED

The six non-English clubs in Pot 1 MUST play TWO Premier League clubs in the Champions League next season.

Real Madrid
Bayern Munich
PSG
Inter Milan
Borussia Dortmund
Barcelona

Impact is on these 6, rather than Prem teams.

HERE'S WHY 👇
espn.com/soccer/story/_…
Last season, Pot 1 teams played eight games in the league phase against English clubs.

They recorded recorded two wins, a draw and five losses.

This season, the 6 must play 12 games to meet the draw constraints caused by 6 Prem teams in the comp + 3 in Pot 1.
Under usual circumstances the composition of the draw pots doesn't matter anymore.

But this year, (for instance) Barcelona and Real Madrid may be forced to play Totttenham or Newcastle as one team from Pot 3 and 4, rather than, say, Slavia Prague or Bodo/Glimt, etc.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 8
That should have been a second yellow for Lucas Bergvall.

It wasn't an attempt to stop a promising attack, which wouldn't result in a caution if the move plays out.

It was a reckless tackle, and should have been a booking regardless of the attack. #TOTLIV
Ange Postecoglu is incorrect for three reasons.

1. Bergvall's offence is a reckless tackle, not stopping a promising attack

2. Advantage isn't applied on a second yellow unless it's an IMMEDIATE goal chance

3. Ref didn't play advantage. Said no foul

Ange is correct that there's no yellow for stopping a promising attack (SPA) if the ref plays advantage and the attack plays out.

But the law doesn't allow Stuart Attwell to play advantage even if he did view Bergvall's challenge as SPA. Play must stop and second yellow shown.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 3, 2024
Club World Cup explainer

🔺 How the 31 teams qualified
🔺 Inter Miami and Messi?
🔺 The old Club World Cup still exists!
🔺 Will it be competitive?
🔺 Player burnout?
🔺 Format
🔺 Match dates
🔺 Draw on Thursday
🔺 Venues
🔺 Trophy

READ 👇
espn.co.uk/football/story…
Club World Cup draw pots now confrimed.

- No group can feature more than one team from the same confederation except UEFA, with 12 teams
- Pot 1 will have paired seedings based on the confederation rankings
- Pot 1 teams go to position 1
- Inter Miami will play the opening match Image
The full match schedule comprising the stadium and kick-off time for each fixture will be finalised and published once the draw has taken place, taking into account a range of factors including sporting and player-centric criteria, local and fans and broadcast considerations.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 30, 2024
Ok, so FIFA has made a small, yet significant change to the protocols for the World Cup qualifying draw.

It could have an impact on each of the home nations, but potentially the greatest effect could be on Wales.

A thread to explain for the home nations. Image
What's changed?

Previously, all Nations League (UNL) quarterfinal (QF) and playoff (PO) teams in Pots 2, 3 and 4 were to be "in priority allocated to groups of four."

This has been removed. These teams now could potentially be in a group of five.

You can see the edit here. Image
Image
So, let's take a look at what this means.

For England, not a huge amount as they could always be in a group of four or five.

However, once England are in a group of four or five, they are, when Pot 2 begins, now able to draw ANY of the teams from Pot 2.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(