This seems like it's coming out of nowhere, but it's based in a conversation I had with someone earlier explaining an important aspect of Woke culture that many of us perceive but few understand. One of the targets that Woke culture wants to dismantle is the innocence of children
The most obvious way Wokeness goes after the innocence of children is in the Queer variant of trans activism, especially by having trans strippers perform for children in schools, for example. Why would they do this?
The belief is that the innocence we encourage in children is part of the systems of power (specifically generated through performativity) that enforce heteronormativity and cisnormativity and thus lead to dysphoria or oppression of gay and potentially trans kids.
The logic isn't terribly complicated: there might be gay or trans kids in the class, say, who would be more comfortable in their sexual identity (if that makes sense for a kid -- it doesn't) and gender identity if they saw disruptions to the usual "binaries" being celebrated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imagine the idiotic luxury of being Woke (Marxist or Fascist). Everything reduces to one variable: the rich, the middle class, racism and racists, sexism and sexists, a broad but constrained concept of normalcy, imperialism, whatever. This is truly intellectual decadence. 🧵
When you're Woke, there's always just one explanation for everything, and there's an associated group of people who can be scapegoated for that universal cause (that is, a devil). It's men! It's racists! It's white people! It's capitalists! Damn them!
Not only is there one answer (or a small number of related answers) to the question of what causes any problem, you also get to sound SMART, SOPHISTICATED, and ETHICALLY SUPERIOR for indulging this intellectually vacuous luxury, so long as you mean it and/or have some buzzwords.
Charles Spurgeon once famously said, "Discernment isn't telling the difference between right and wrong; it's telling the difference between right and almost right."
Lies and evil rarely show themselves as false or wrong. They show up in the guises of true and right enough. 🧵
Many people have heard the warning of incrementalist change being like moving three inches at a time until one day you suddenly realize you're three miles down the road not knowing how you got there and not sure how to go back. It can be more subtle than that.
Imagine you're in a jet flying a thousand miles, and your course bearings are set just 1° off from the direction you should be going. After flying a thousand miles, you'll be over seventeen miles from where you intended to be. Every hundred miles you go, you stray by 1.7+ miles.
Corrupted Christian doctrine together with a deracinated, subverted liberalism, both calling themselves "progressive" at times, worked together to this end. A reactionary church will be summoned as its negation so that the resistance will not find genuine faith in God or country.
Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum have been quite clear for over a decade, as have other organizations working in this manner for roughly a century, that they seek a values shift that's to be accomplished through faith. The future they plan isn't secular at all.
Be cautious with people denigrating "the Enlightenment" to advance some political project (which is invariably Woke, Left or Right). It refers to several things, not all of which agree.
America is based on Scottish Common Sense Realism, not French or German Idealism. 🇺🇸
The post-liberty Right ("Woke Right") tend to talk trash on the Englightenment in a sloppy way so they can attack American Classical Liberalism instead of conserving it. This error is only forgiveable at first. By now, the big players MUST know better because it's been clarified.
It's certainly the case that Communism arises out of the Neoplatonist/Idealist German and French Enlightenment, but American Classical Liberalism, which opposes these and always has, comes from somewhere else, despite some overlaps at the beginning, namely Common Sense Realism.
You may have noticed that people who are wrong, especially when doing wrong, not just factually wrong, often attack people telling the truth. That's Error hating Truth.
Why does Error hate Truth? A borrowed lesson from my friend the Honorable Bob McEwan. 🧵
Imagine we're in an auditorium, and I say the auditorium is 50 feet wide, and you say it's 60 feet, and someone else says it's 80 feet. Obviously, we cannot all be correct (although we could all be wrong).
Now suppose we don't have any way to measure the room but decide it's important to figure out. I sit there and give my best arguments for 50 feet, and you argue for 60, and the other guy argues for 80, and we appeal to this and that and talk and talk and talk.
If you wonder why I don't interact with her, it's because she's dangerously obsessed with me and does this dishonest cluster-B thing all the time. Most of her posts are about me. Most of her streams are about me. It's all unhinged cluster-B provocation. See it?
I spare absolutely zero sympathy for the Groypers, but I think it's kind of funny how she's ingratiating herself with them and doing a borderline elevation of Nick Fuentes to do it, getting them to take her orders and do her bidding. That much is actually kind of hilarious.