This seems like it's coming out of nowhere, but it's based in a conversation I had with someone earlier explaining an important aspect of Woke culture that many of us perceive but few understand. One of the targets that Woke culture wants to dismantle is the innocence of children
The most obvious way Wokeness goes after the innocence of children is in the Queer variant of trans activism, especially by having trans strippers perform for children in schools, for example. Why would they do this?
The belief is that the innocence we encourage in children is part of the systems of power (specifically generated through performativity) that enforce heteronormativity and cisnormativity and thus lead to dysphoria or oppression of gay and potentially trans kids.
The logic isn't terribly complicated: there might be gay or trans kids in the class, say, who would be more comfortable in their sexual identity (if that makes sense for a kid -- it doesn't) and gender identity if they saw disruptions to the usual "binaries" being celebrated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So thanks to Tucker Carlson, evolution is back on the table of contentious conversations, but, as will surprise almost no one, we're discussing it in completely the wrong way.
We need to talk about evolution, but it's not Genesis versus Darwin. It's reality versus "New Genesis."
In the podcast premiering now on @NewDiscourses, you will hear very clearly that the United Nations has been pushing a *theosophical* concept of evolution and has been angling for decades to seize control over the evolution of humanity, human beings, the planet, and the cosmos.
@NewDiscourses The theosophical idea of evolution is completely distinct from and opposed to both Christian creationism and "Darwinian" evolutionary theory (evolution by natural selection, minus any of Darwin's less useful ideas). This is very important to understand. It's something evil.
"Women" don't exist. There's no such thing as "women."
Neither do "gays" or especially the execrable "LGBTQ+."
"Christians" don't really exist either, but at least here it's closer.
These statements sound insane, but this is going to be an important thread.
I hear all the time that "women" voted for this, or "women" believe that. "Women" DOESN'T exist.
Note the grammar.
Individuals who are women (adult human females) exist. "Women" is a class made up of billions of individual females (and zero males, we have to note). This is big.
"Women" (in quotes here) refers to a class that is not a monolith. It is a descriptive term for billions of people, each of whom has an individual mind. "Women" didn't vote for anything, even if 62% of them, say, did. Almost 40% of them chose something else.
More accurate: Woke (CRT) enables and makes use of anti-white racism such that it proliferates.
This distinction matters a lot. Woke (CRT) is something far more evil and sinister than racial animus, and racial animus is bait.
I don't know how to tell people the Woke (and especially the people making use of them) WANT white people to think of themselves as a racial class that's in intrinsic conflict with other racial classes, collectively "people of color." It's the Communist Manifesto, p. 1 of ch. 1!
Going from p. 1 of ch. 1 of the Communist Manifesto, finding yourself in antagonistic (racial) class identities is posited always to end either in revolution (red or white) or in the "common ruin of the contended classes."
Reject the entire destructive path! It's not the way!
The politics of compliance, as I've termed it, are designed to create what has elsewhere been termed "mass-formation psychosis." When color-revolution-level psychological active measures are applied to the politics of compliance, you get this scale of mass-formation psychosis.
The politics of compliance is an overarching term I'm using for what we might identify as "Maoism," since Mao was perhaps history's most successful pusher of the politics of compliance. You can read about the basic principles here. newdiscourses.com/2024/03/maos-p…
The basic engine of the politics of compliance is dividing the population into two essential groups: the compliant and the non-compliant. There are two types of non-compliants: passive (reluctant) and active (refusing). The goal is to maximize the quantity of compliants.
The line isn't Left vs Right. It's "the truth matters" versus "the truth is what we need it to be." That's the epistemological line between good and evil.
The Activist Left knows that's the actual line, and they've known it for a long time. That's why much of their propaganda is projection: accusing truth-tellers and truth-seekers of manipulating facts to lie. That is, of course, what they're doing, and they know why they do it.
Once a person has been intellectually demoralized, they can no longer think. Being unable to think, to reason, they are led by emotions further and further into confusion. They learn which utterances bring carrots and which sticks and repeat accordingly. Slay, queens!
Meet Dom Helder Camara, the "Red Bishop" upon whom much of our present Woke catastrophe can be blamed.
If you want to know how our culture got so degraded by Third Generation (Western) Marxist ideologies, you need to understand Liberation Theology and what it has influenced.
Dom Helder Camara was a Liberation Theologian from Recife Brazil, though he didn't start his priestly career that way (we'll come back to this). Liberation Theology, in brief, is the result of deliberate Soviet infiltration into the Catholic Church to pervert its doctrines.
Before he was instrumental in the development and implementation of Liberation Theology in the Third World countries of South and Central America, Camara was an up-and-coming Brazilian Integralist who was fast-tracked through the priesthood due to his embrace of that ideology.