Here's our post from 2013 in response to the charge of #JewishPrivilege in part by listing the the daily effects of non-Jewish privilege. bit.ly/2CvGF6E
1. You likely don’t have your people’s right to national self-determination questioned or characterised as racist.
2. You are not accused of being more loyal to a foreign state than to the interests of your own nation.
3. You are not accused of exercising disproportionate control over the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
4. You are likely never accused of being part of an international conspiracy to control the world.
5. Your success and personal achievements – and other fruits of your hard work – aren’t turned upside down and framed as merely evidence of your ‘privilege‘.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵THREAD: Why does the BBC STILL employ journalists who publicly celebrated the horrific October 7th massacre?
1/ Yesterday @BBC told @Telegraph it “strongly” denied @4mediastandards’ claims its reporters “celebrated acts of terror”.
2/ CAMERA’s analysis tells a different story…
Beirut-based BBC reporter Sanaa Elkhoury (@sanaakhouri) liked 7/10 comments about sweets handed out in Lebanon “in celebration” of the massacre, and about Gaza being “liberated”.
Running thread, for the duration of the war, of media outlets which published material justifying the Hamas attacks to one degree or another, or suggesting a moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel
.@thetimes book review legitimises an antisemitic conspiracy theory by Avi Shlaim, which blames Jews themselves for the Farhud and other manifestations of antisemitism in 1940s-50s Iraq
@thetimes Any Iraqi who believed there was "Jewish complicity" in the British/Anglo invasion of Iraq in 1941 was, by definition, anti-Semitic
The award for most egregiously inaccurate British media headline about Palestinian rioting at the Temple Mount early this morning - following Hamas incitement - goes to @MailOnline
It's like Hamas hacked into the DM's computers and wrote the headline themselves
@MailOnline@RoleMarks What really occurred is that dozens of masked Palestinians barricaded themselves inside the mosque with fireworks, clubs and rocks following evening prayers, while locking the doors and placing barricades at the entrances.
@MailOnline@RoleMarks Officers then reportedly tried to convince those inside to leave but were forced to enter the mosque, where they were attacked with rocks and fireworks. Police said dozens of were arrested and that “the rioters caused damage to the mosque and desecrated it.”
.@guardian's charge that there’s been an "erosion" of Palestinians from Jerusalem over the years is contradicted by open source population data camera-uk.org/2023/04/03/gua…
@guardian The proportion of Palestinians and Jews in east Jerusalem has remained fairly steady over the last 40 years – at a 3:2 ratio
@guardian Since 1990, Palestinian population growth in the city (both east and west) has significantly exceeded the Jewish population growth
As the quote in your article correctly notes, @m7mdkurd literally accused Israel of harvesting the organs of dead Palestinians and "feeding" them to their own soldiers - a vile, medieval antisemitic charge.
1/3
@siancain@guardian@m7mdkurd You then legitmise that monstorous accusation by comparing it to something entirely different - a 2009 article about a long abandoned Israeli medical practice of using the corneas of deceased Israelis and Palestinians w/o permission.
2/2
We complained to Guardian editors about your erroneous legitmisation of el-Kurd's blood libel 3/3