My Authors
Read all threads
+UPDATE+

Dominic Cummings had discussions with british media (inc. senior BBC & ITV journalists) on govt herd immunity strategy in March which have been unreported - even tho now both TV stations continue to allow govt to present the case that herd immunity was never the policy.
2/

In effect BBC & ITV collaborated in a “quiet” herd immunity strategy but when govt was forced to change track as deaths mounted then were co-opted into the Govt’s stance that it did not happen.
3/

One group of “influential” media inc. one senior well known ITV journalist had several meetings with Dominic Cummings at the start of March, in which herd immunity policy was discussed. With benefits outlined.

Some of this leaked but no media reports SINCE policy change.
4/

This then formed some of the media reporting reporting around Coronavirus which then abruptly stopped when U.K. govt suddenly changed policy due to mounting deaths.

Since then BBC & ITV have suppressed reporting on this to a minimum.
itv.com/news/2020-03-1…
5/

The problem here - which I don’t think for one moment knowledge thereof is limited - is that briefings are confidential.

Normally I have no problem with this.

However, this sets up ethical question that media now reporting uncritically something they NOW know to be false.
6/

I understand why it makes sense that some govt “context” on sensitive issues is disseminated privately to journalists. I also understand why a spokesperson should be unattributable sometimes.

However something has seriously gone wrong here.

And here why...
7/

Where the spokesman/source is actually deciding the policy AND providing context then maintaining confidentiality when policy is changed in effect co-opts journalists as active & discreet partipants into the govt communication machine.

This is what has happened now in UK.
8/

Many of you know I publicly stopped using “UK govt sources” where it referred to Dominic Cummings in January.

The issue here is that I felt reporting was becoming compromised where the spokesperson is an active policy decider.

We now see the effect of this on UK media.
9/

I see a couple of people have cast doubt on this thread. I find this a bit bemusing as I thought it one of my least controversial. Much of the information here has been widely known since months on any case.
10/

Not much to add to this thread now.
However I recommend reading this which has just dropped.

This is not a conspiracy - indeed much of this is easily verifiable. Its just not talked about publicly - which is rather different.

The question is - why?

bylinetimes.com/2020/07/15/sag…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!